Preamble

The House met at Eleven o'clock

PRAYERS

[Mr. SPEAKER in the Chair]

Orders of the Day — HEALTH SERVICES BILL

[ALLOTTED DAY]

Lords amendments considered.

Clause 1

THE HEALTH SERVICES BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES

Lords amendment: No. 1, in page 1, line 10, leave out "five" and insert "seven".

11.5 a.m.

The Secretary of State for Social Services (Mr. David Ennals): I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.

Mr. Speaker: I call attention to the fact that privilege is involved in this amendment.

Mr. Ennals: This amendment from the Lords is not acceptable to the Government. There is no need for the Health Services Board to be larger than the balanced membership of chairman and four members, as was provided for in the Bill to which this House gave a Third Reading by a majority of 24. That is a satisfactory size for the job the Board has to do.
Moreover, I have to remind the House that the principle on which this House gave this Bill its Second Reading and its Third Reading was that it embodies a compromise. That compromise was reached after lengthy and difficult discussions with the representatives of the medical and dental professions. The Government undertook to embody the terms of that compromise in legislation, and that

the Bill does. The terms, published on 15th December 1975, included explicit provision for the constitution of the independent Health Services Board: a chairman and two members from the medical profession and two selected after consultation with bodies representative of the interests of other NHS staff and those representing the interests of NHS patients. That was what was in the Bill as it left this House, and it should remain.

Mr. Patrick Jenkin: It might be helpful if at the outset I were briefly to say a few words about our approach to today's debates. We shall be dealing today, if we can, with a large number of amendments on which there were tied votes in Standing Committee. Amendments were lost only by virtue of the Chairman's casting vote. When we debated these matters last month on Report, many of these amendments—more than 30—were never reached because of the operation of the guillotine.
A great deal of time has been spent in another place in debating the Bill, and many of the amendments on which there were tied votes in Committee and which were guillotined on Report in this House come before us again today to enable this House to reach a conclusion upon them. It is the constitutional duty of hon. Members to do their utmost to ensure that each of the amendments is the subject of a conclusive decision by the House and not to send the Bill back to another place, with whatever messages we prepare, with large numbers of amendments on which we have not reached a conclusion because of the operation of the guillotine.

Mr. Dennis Skinner: In that case, because the right hon. Gentleman feels that all the available time is needed to debate matters in the Bill which, according to him, have not been properly examined, will he use every minute available to him today, Friday, under the terms of the guillotine?

Mr. Jenkin: The hon. Gentleman has misconstrued what I said. I said that it


is important that the House should reach a conclusion upon the amendments Many of them are hotly contested, and it would be right that we should express our views in the Division Lobbies—and there will be a number of Divisions. The time for debate must be accordingly curtailed because of the guillotine. The hon. Gentleman is inviting me to let through the amendments without Divisions. [Interruption.] The hon. Gentleman is now inviting us to finish early.

Mr. Skinner: No—the right hon. Gentleman is.

Mr. Jenkin: No, I am not.

Mr. Speaker: Order. The hon. Member for Bolsover (Mr. Skinner) must not interrupt from a sedentary position. If he wishes to interrupt, he knows what to do.

Mr. Jenkin: I gave way to the hon. Gentleman—

Mr. Skinner: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. It is fair to say that an hon. Member speaking from a sedentary position should on occasion be challenged if it is being done continually. I have been a Member for some time, and in the past six years I have heard many hon. Members make remarks from sedentary positions. In the past two days, in debates in which I took no part, there were literally scores of such interruptions. I wonder whether this is a new ruling that you have decided to make—

Mr. Speaker: Order. The hon. Member knows that this is not the first time I have had to tell him. I have told him before, as I have told the House, that interruptions from a sedentary position, especially when they are continued, as the hon. Member did three times, spoil debates in the House.

Mr. Jenkin: It is our intention to do our utmost to reach a conclusion on every amendment suggested by the other place. That will require a great deal of self-discipline on the part of myself and my hon. Friends, and I hope that Government Members will help the House to reach conclusions upon amendments on which this House has not had an opportunity to reach a final decision. That means that our speeches will need to be brief.
We have made no secret of the fact that we dislike the Bill intensely. We believe

that it would be improved considerably if all the amendments from another place were accepted. The truth is, and it was made clear on Report in many speeches from below the Gangway on the Government side, that the phasing out of pay beds from our hospitals owes a great deal more to Left-Wing hostility to the professions than to any desire to help NHS patients.
In fact, the Bill is nothing more than the class war carried into law. The Goodman proposals had the effect of institutionalising this class war, and by what the Secretary of State calls a balanced Board of five members, two to represent the medical profession—and two to represent other interests, he is, in effect, institutionalising the continuation of this struggle that is such a source of bitterness and anguish within the National Health Service.
In another place Lord Wells-Pestell let forth an incautious statement about the Government's view of what the Board is supposed to be. After referring to the two members of the Board to come from the medical profession he said
so there will be two members over whom, if you like, the Government will have no control at all."—[Official Report, House of Lords, 4th November 1976; Vol. 376, c. 1463]
The implication of that is that the other three members, the chairman and two appointed after consultation with other interests in the NHS, will be those over whom the Government have control. That is totally unacceptable to us. We believe that it is a disastrous approach, and that it will perpetuate the conflict that has disfigured the NHS on this issue.
I hope that the House will be prepared to accept the amendments that have been passed to us from another place, that the number of the Board should be increased from five to seven, that there should be three representing the medical profession, that there should be one representing, as it were, the nurses and the other supplementary professions, and appointed after consultations with the appropriate organisations, that there should be one representing all patients, and that one other member should be appointed after consultation with the other interests.
Such a Board would be far more likely to reach objective and harmonious decisions and avoid the institutionalised class


war that will be involved in the Board as we have it. I therefore invite my right hon. and hon. Friends to divide the House in favour of retaining the amendment and against the Government's motion.

11.15 a.m.

Mr. Laurie Pavitt: I shall respond to the request by the right hon. Member for Wanstead and Woodford (Mr. Jenkin) to be brief, because if he proposes to take us through the Lobbies 69 times today we shall need to keep our speeches to a minimum.
Reference has again been made to the fact that there were even votes in Committee upstairs. I put it to the House that if there are equal numbers on each side of the Committee there is no alternative to arriving at similar decisions on each occasion.
I shall not use the word "tedious" when I talk of repetition, otherwise I shall be criticising the Chair, but it is my contention that on this measure containing 24 clauses there have been more Second Reading speeches on amendments and on the Lords amendment than on any other measure that has come before the House.
The Board is part of a fine balance that the Government accepted—some of us thought wrongly—after it was put forward by Lord Goodman. It seems that their Lordships and the right hon. Member for Wanstead and Woodford are anxious to destroy that balance only when it favours their side of the case, but when my hon. Friends and I would like to see the terms of some provision as part of the compromise made a little stronger, Lord Goodman is the person whom the Opposition call in aid to oppose us.
Having seven members on the Board would make a nonsense of the delicate balance that has been struck of two in favour and two against separation, with the chairman independent. All of their Lordships' proposal would not improve the legislation, but would make a dog's dinner of it. There are more idiotic amendments to be Bill from the other place than I have ever seen, and if they were passed in toto they would make a nonsense of the Bill and of the Government's policies. Therefore, I shall vote with my right hon. Friend.

Mr. Skinner: You will recall, Mr. Speaker, that when the right hon. Member for Wanstead and Woodford (Mr. Jenkin) commenced his remarks on the amendment he referred to the generality of the Bill and the way in which it had been handled in both Houses. I intervened to ask what I considered to be a pertinent question, namely, whether the Opposition would use the real weapon available to them to oppose a measure, and that is to debate it properly. I wanted to know whether, on this Friday, an unusual day for Government business, with a three-line Whip in operation, the Opposition would use all the time allocated to them under the guillotine motion to tell the nation what they say on public platforms about the contentious nature of the Bill and the way in which it will be carried out in practice.
I get the impression, from my intervention and the subsequent sedentary interventions, which were not occasions for shouting slogans, or "Rubbish", but merely continued the argument, that the Opposition do not intend to use the time that is available to debate the Bill but intend, instead, to run way from the issue.
I want to place it on record that the Opposition have a duty to stand by what they continually say outside the House about a measure such as this. I get the impression—I put it no higher than that—that what they are really doing is attempting to fight the issue in this House without fighting to the extent of which they are capable, as will be demonstrated today and as has been demonstrated on previous occasions, and are instead using the other place, with its massive majority of Tory peers, to fight their battles for them.
I want to get it on record that although so-called fights are put up on occasions in the House of Commons on some of these contentious measures, they really are phoney, and that what the Opposition are doing all the time is avoiding the real opportunities for debate in this House and using the House of Lords to try to obstruct measures that have been accepted by the electorate and agreed to on numerous occasions by democratic votes in this House.

Mr. Ennals: I refer, first, to the point made by the right hon. Member for


Wanstead and Woodford (Mr. Jenkin) about the comment of my noble Friend Lord Wells-Pestell. It was a little unfortunate that the right hon. Gentleman quoted something said by my noble Friend, when three pages later my noble Friend said that he did not recall using those words and immediately made it clear that what he was reported as saying was a slip of the tongue. The arrangement is that the chairman is independent, and there are four members of the Board, two from the medical profession appointed after consultation, and two representing other interests and also appointed after consultation and the Government have no control over any of them.

Mr. Patrick Jenkin: Would the right hon. Gentleman not agree that inadvertent slips of the tongue are often more indicative of intention than the carefully modulated phrases which one hears and which are shown in Hansard?

Mr. Ennals: I have heard the right hon. Gentleman say things that he regretted later. I at least give credit to my hon. and noble Friend for, immediately after it was drawn to his attention —[Interruption.] I hope that the right hon. Gentleman will listen because, with respect, he has raised this point with me. The right hon. Gentleman ought to show me the courtesy of listening as well as showing courtesy to my hon. and noble Friend who dealt with this in the other place. My hon. and noble Friend immediately took the opportunity of correcting this on the record. Sometimes if hon. and right hon. Gentlemen opposite were as courteous in doing so we would proceed better.
I think that it would be anvantageous if we had as many votes as we could. My wish today is simply to show that the issues that we shall be debating have been thoroughly debated in Committee and on Report. In Committee the amendments were carried by a tied vote in many cases but this was because we did not have a majority. But every vote on Report was carried by a substantial majority. As we moved from Second Reading to Report the majorities increased, and this may well be so today.
The more votes we have the better, because it will then be seen that the elected Members in this House have spoken and

that it ill-behoves the other place to challenge the views of the elected Members of this House. It is only on this amendment that I wish to pick up these few points. After that, I shall co-operate totally by simply proposing reasons why we should reject the Lords amendment.
This is a measure which has been carefully considered by this House in Committee and on Report. We are determined that the Bill will pass into law. [Interruption.] The right hon. Member for Wanstead and Woodford intervenes from a sedentary position. Since he has done so, I shall take no notice of what he said.
Our determinatioin is to get this measure through. The period of uncertainty about the Bill has gone on long enough. There is no benefit at all for the morale of those who work in the Health Service for the surgical operation to be postponed any longer. A lot has been said about waiting lists. The Bill has been on the waiting list since February 1974 and it is time that we got on with the job.
We wish to see this measure through Parliament. Of course, it is a compromise between two more extreme points of view. It is not satisfactory to everyone. I have heard hon. Gentlemen opposite sometimes say that it represents full-blooded Socialism. One of the criticisms of many of my hon Friends is that it is not. It is a compromise between extreme points of view. The author of the compromise, Lord Goodman, has recognised that it is in the interests of the Health Service that the Bill should now be carried through. The noble Lord said in another place, on the 21st October—

Mr. Patrick Jenkin: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. I do not wish to interrupt the Secretary of State's flow of oratory but are we to understand that an exception is to be made from the normal rule that one can quote only speeches from members of the Government in another place? Is Lord Goodman now to be treated as a member of the Government?

Mr. Speaker: Order. It is customary to paraphrase speeches by those Members of another place who are not Ministers.

Mr. Ennals: I am happy to paraphrase, Mr. Speaker. What Lord Goodman said was that it was in the interests of the NHS that this compromise measure


should now be completed and become law forthwith.

Mr. Patrick Jenkin: Mr. Patrick Jenkin rose—

Mr. Ennals: For Heaven's sake.

Mr. Patrick Jenkin: Would the right hon. Gentleman agree that Lord Goodman made it abundantly clear that he was against the whole principle of the legislation?

Mr. Ennals: That was not the question at all. Here we are dealing with an issue which has been an open challenge within the Health Service. There are a number of people—Lord Goodman is one and my right hon. Friend the Member for Blackburn (Mrs. Castle) is another—who honestly wanted to bring a settlement to this dispute. That was the basis of the compromise put before the House in December last year. That is the basis of this legislation which has passed through this House on previous occasions. It is now in the best interests of harmonious relationships within the NHS that the Bill should become law.
I would pay tribute to Government supporters in the other place who nobly stood by the Bill presented by this elected House of Commons. I believe that any attempts to destroy the compromise by unrepresentative, unelected peers—certainly in alliance with the Conservative leadership—ought to be exposed. It should not be allowed to happen. It is playing party politics with the NHS.
We want to get the Bill through and do everything that we can to improve the morale of the NHS. The time has come to call a halt. On the following amendments I shall do no more than simply repeat the simple reasons why this House doth disagree with the Lords amendments.

Mr. J. W. Rooker: I support my right hon. Friend. If I had my way I would reduce the Health Service Board to three, but I am happy to settle for five.
It is important to get on the record that even in the short period that we have been speaking this morning you, Mr. Speaker, have already been placed in a difficult position. I wish to seek your guidance with respect to the rest

of the day. It has already been conceded across the two Front Benches that the Opposition require 13 Divisions.
It is implied, in what has also been said, that they require these Divisions before five o'clock. Divisions take on average a quarter of an hour. That is over four hours for Divisions within the six hours allocated for the Bill. We shall have less than two hours to debate the issues. That can be achieved only if debate is curtailed. I am told that in fact there is an agreement that only one speaker from each side will be called on each group of amendments. I seek your reassurance, Mr. Speaker, that any hon. Member who wishes to speak on any of these amendments, and who seeks to catch your eye, will not fail to be called simply because of what the two Front Benches require.
You are the guardian of the rights of Back Benchers and you are the guardian of the rights of this House against the other place. If no more is required of you today, it is make sure that those rights are fully put into operation. We would be prepared to stay here and vote all night if necessary to make sure that this legislation reaches the statute book and not to be subservient to a squalid little deal which has obviously been done between both Front Benches.

Mr. Speaker: I appreciate what the hon. Gentleman said about my responsibility, and I agree with him. But the fact is that hon. Members will not be here voting all night because the guillotine will fall at five o'clock. I will ensure to the utmost of my ability that if any hon. Member seeks to speak, he will be heard.

Question put:—

The House divided: Ayes 274, Noes 240.

For Division List No. 422 see c. 1807.]

Question accordingly agreed to.

Clause 2

PURPOSE OF SS. 3 TO 5

Lords amendment: No. 2, in page 2, line 43, at end insert—
(3) Nothing shall be done under or by virtue of this Act, and nothing in this Act shall be construed, so as to operate to the detriment


of any person (whether or not a consultant), who was on 12th April 1976 employed whole-time or part-time in one or other of the national health services or concerned with the interests of patients at NHS hospitals, whether or not such detriment occurs under, by reason or in consequence of the terms of his employment.

The Minister of State, Department of Health and Social Security (Mr. Roland Moyle): I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.
The main reason for our opposition to the amendment is that it is drafted in exceptionally wide terms, even if one could be confident that it was related only to employees in the National Health Service. Under one construction of the amendment it could be assumed that it applies to people other than those who are employed in the NHS, as one class possibly referred to in the amendment is those who were on 12th April 1976 concerned with the interests of patients at NHS hospitals, whether or not detriment occurred to them by reason or in consequence of the terms of their employment. That would be a wide class of persons and it would be impossible to envisage who might be covered by the amendment.
In addition, employees of the NHS are to a large measure protected, and there is little danger that any employees will suffer serious detriment as a result of the phasing out of pay bed operations.
We would welcome those consultants on part-time contracts who wish to convert to full-time contracts with the NHS. Pay beds are to be phased out at a rate which will enable suitable provision to be made outside the NHS. Consultants, therefore, will have appropriate notice to enable them to adjust to the new arrangements.
It is very unlikely, although a complete guarantee cannot be given, that NHS employees who are not consultants will lose their jobs by reason of the phasing out of pay beds. They all have excellent trade unions and comprehensive Whitley machinery which will afford them protection. I therefore ask the House to reject the amendment.

11.45 a.m.

Mr. Paul Dean: The Opposition regret that the Government have not been prepared to accept at least

the principle of the amendment. I get the impression from what the Minister of State said and our earlier debates that the Government are rather uneasy about this because at different times they have used different arguments.
The amendment could concern all NHS staff, especially consultants. The background is that we are dealing with members of a profession who feel battered and bruised by the Government and suspicious after having been badly handled by the right hon. Member for Blackburn (Mrs. Castle). They fear for their independence and their clinical freedom. In view of the hostile remarks which have been made against the medical profession by Government supporters, and the fact that the Labour Party Conference wished to go much further than the Bill goes and to abolish entirely private practice, it is no wonder that the medical profession has these fears. That is the background against which we ask the Government to consider the amendment.
We wish to establish the simple principle of no detriment. It is a principle to which the trade unions, rightly, have attached particular importance over the years. We say that what is sauce for the goose should be sauce for the gander. If the principle of no detriment is right for trade unions, it should equally be right for consultants and others in the NHS.
People who suffer through no fault of their own because the Government have changed the law should be compensated. The Government have tried to argue, as the Minister did today, that there is no need for the amendment because people will not suffer. But they could suffer. The Government have given no guarantee that there will not be some people who suffer.
I take, first, the maximum part-time consultant who wishes to go whole-time. The Minister said that the Government would welcome that, but there is no guarantee that the consultant will get a whole-time contract. There is no guarantee that there will be a job available or that the hospital concerned will be able to afford it. The former Minister of State in earlier debates said that this must be subject always to the needs of the service.
There could be a loss here. The consultant who, feeling that he cannot conscientiously under the new arrangements do both his NHS work and private work, decides to give up his private work and to concentrate on his NHS patients, will almost certainly suffer a loss of income. There is no guarantee that that loss will be even partly made up by his being able to go full-time. This could involve a considerable disruption for the individual consultants concerned, some of whom may have had this arrangement for 30 years since the NHS started.
It could also work the other way round. A consultant who, because he is losing pay beds, decides to give up his NHS work and go entirely private has no guarantee that he will be able to do that. It may be said, if he decides to go private, that it is his own choice and he should stand on his own feet, but there may not be alternative facilities available.
The Government have turned down numerous Opposition amendments designed to ensure that phasing out should be dependent upon alternative private facilities being reasonably available. We say that the Government should either accept that phasing out should be dependent upon adequate alternative facilities being available or be prepared to provide compensation in the event of loss. The Government have refused to do either. It may be that very few people will suffer. We hope that few will suffer, but even if only one individual suffers it is the duty of the House when changing the law to protect that one individual.
There are ample precedents in the NHS for what is being suggested, and I very much regret that the Government have not seen fit to accept this simple, well-established principle. If the Government do not have second thoughts, I hope that the House will divide so that we may state clearly our strong feeling that it is wrong that the Government in changing the law should expose individuals to possible loss without providing any compensation.

Mr. Michael Spicer: I do not want to delay the proceedings, and I certainly do not want to delay proceeding towards a vote on this matter. However, I cannot help but support my hon. Friend the Member for

Somerset, North (Mr. Dean). Surely this amendment goes to the very root of the matter.
If we do not have some kind of built-in guarantee against detriment, the Government must accept that many of the consultants concerned will go into the private sector and be lost to the National Health Service.
That, to Opposition Members, might not be totally objectionable were it not for the fact that we frequently read the pronouncements of Labour Members below the Gangway who wish to abolish the private sector. That is clearly behind our worries throughout the entire proceedings on this Bill. We and the consultants are concerned that, if there is no built-in guarantee against detriment, they will go private.
We fear that a future Labour Government will abolish the private sector and that the consultants, therefore, will go abroad, and that yet another future Labour Government will abolish the right to practise and the right to have private treatment abroad. That is the direction in which we are heading. This amendment goes to the root of that objection. [Interruption.] I hear a Government supporter say "Sixth-form stuff". But every other Socialist State—presumably that is what the Labour Government want—has controls on the movements of its citizens both within and across its borders. If we do not give our consultants the kind of returns which they need and can get abroad, they will go abroad. A future Socialist Government will then no doubt forbid them to practise and give treatment abroad.
Unless, at this stage, we can build in some kind of guarantee against detriment, it seems that we shall inevitably move towards a situation where, first, people will go exclusively to the private sector—I have never heard the Government argue that that will be the trend—and, secondly, a future Labour Government will abolish that. On those grounds, I support what was said by my hon. Friend the Member for Somerset, North.

Mr. Rooker: This amendment, which seeks to ensure that there is no detriment to people employed in the National Health Service, refers also to whole-time consultants. Until 20 minutes ago,


I had always understood that whole-time consultants were not allowed to charge fees or to treat private patients. Having read Amendment No. 2, which we are seeking to remove from the Bill, and having read the minutes of a meeting of the Ealing, Hammersmith and Hounslow Area Health Authority of 10th November, when it discussed the audit report, I understand that whole-time consultants have been treating and charging private patients, contrary to the regulations.

Mr. Paul Dean: Would the hon. Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr (Mr. Rooker) address his remarks to the other part of the amendment, which deals with part-time consultants? We are concerned not with whole-time consultants, but with part-time consultants.

Mr. Rooker: Of course, the hon. Member for Somerset, North (Mr. Dean) would wish me to deal with part-time consultants, because they can charge fees for private treatment. But that is not the point. The amendment also refers to whole-time consultants.

Mr. Robert Boscawen: Of course, whole-time consultants are entitled to charge private patients.

Mr. Rooker: Frankly, the auditors of the Ealing, Hammersmith and Hounslow Area Health Authority do not think so. It was reported to that authority, in private session on 10th November, that whole-time consultants had been charging professional fees contrary to the regulations. Six consultants were concerned, and the losses were made between May and June 1976.
The Opposition claim to be seeking to ensure that people do not suffer any detriment. I shall stick to the question of whole-time consultants. It seems that whole-time consultants, because of laxity of control in the NHS over private patients, are already jumping on the gravy train notwithstanding that, by and large, private patients do not pay the bills. Massive amounts have to be recovered by legal action.

Mr. Robert Kilroy-Silk: Shame!

Mr. Rooker: It is correct. We hear stories from the Opposition about people

not paying their bills and scrounging on the Welfare State, but private fee-paying patients do not pay their bills and a great deal of the money has to be recovered by legal action.
I have no wish to spoil the debate or to be out of order, but that is the position of whole-time consultants. Opposition Members are concerned to ensure that whole-time consultants do not suffer any detriment. I should like my right hon. Friend to confirm that what I have said is correct. I should also like him to confirm that the Department will look into the position at Hammersmith Hospital and the illegal practice of whole-time consultants which the auditors have drawn to the attention of the Area Health Authority.
The Opposition and the House of Lords are seeking to protect a procedure which is not right and proper but which continues to be part of the gravy train of milking the National Health Service and allows queue-jumping which forces people to accept that they must go private to get the necessary treatment for themselves or their families.
I think that it is disgraceful that the Opposition should seek to protect whole-time consultants who, in practice, should not need protection, because they should not suffer any detriment under the Bill. It is the part-time consultants whom the Opposition should take steps to protect. The decision whether to continue part-time or to go whole-time places those consultants in a dilemma. Whole-time consultants will not suffer detriment, but those who have been fiddling the system should suffer some sort of detriment. On that point, I should imagine that I have the support of my hon. Friends. [HON. MEMBERS: "Hear, hear."] It seems that I clearly have that support.
I hope that the Government will look into the situation at Hammersmith Hospital where the auditors have drawn attention to the malpractices of whole-time consultants.

Question put:—

The House divided: Ayes 278, Noes 249.

[For Division List No. 423 see c. 1811]

Question accordingly agreed to.

Clause 3

IMMEDIATE DUTY OF SECRETARY OF STATE AS REGARDS WITHDRAWAL OF NHS BEDS FROM RESIDENT PRIVATE PATIENTS

Lords amendment: No. 3, in page 3, line 1, leave out subsections (1) and (2) and insert—
(1) Within 12 months after the passing of this Act the Board shall submit to the Secretary of State proposals for reducing, in the case of each Area Health Authority, Health Board and group of preserved Boards in Great Britain, the number of beds at NHS hospitals administered by that Authority, or by Boards within that group, authorised under section 1(1) of the 1968 Act to be made available to resident private patients, provided that the total number of beds proposed for such reduction shall not exceed 1,000.
(2) It shall be the duty of the Secretary of State to give effect to the said proposals by revoking the authorisations for those beds, and to make those beds available for use by resident patients who are not private patients.

Mr. Ennals: I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.

Mr. Deputy Speaker (Mr. Bryant Godman Irvine): With this we may discuss Lords Amendments Nos. 4, 5, 6, 69, and Lords Amendment No. 7 and the last amendment in lieu.

Mr. Ennals: The effect of the amendment would be to remove the Secretary of State's duty to phase out 1,000 beds and would require the Board to put proposals to the Secretary of State within 12 months for withdrawing not more than 1,000 beds. The early phasing out of pay beds was part of the Goodman compromise and the amendment would have a severe delaying effect.
Over several months we have been in constant consultation with area health authorities in preparation for the provisions contained in Schedule 2 and the amendment would simply mean a delay of six months in phasing out pay beds. Since the determination of the House is clear, I am certain that hon. Members will accept that there is no reason why we should delay making progress.
I now turn to a point raised by my hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr (Mr. Rooker) about the treatment of private patients at Hammersmith Hospital. It appears to be

true, according to the health authority, that certain whole-time hospital consultants have been charging professional fees contrary to the regulations. The charging of fees by whole-time consultants has never been approved by the authority. I am assured that the matter is being reviewed and that controls will be strengthened.

Sir George Young: My hon. Friends and I attach great importance to Lords Amendment No. 3 which would oblige the Health Services Board, not the Secretary of State, to choose the first 1,000 pay beds to be phased out. We see little merit in setting up a Health Services Board, giving it obligations to phase out pay beds, and laying down criteria by which that shall be done, if the Secretary of State himself decides to phase out the first 1,000 pay beds, which may be the only beds to be phased out under the Bill. The Secretary of State is buying himself an expensive pedigree dog and doing all the yapping himself. He will be yapping at the wrong things at the wrong time.
The criteria he can use could be totally different from the criteria that the Health Board decides upon, which could lead to a completely illogical phasing out. We think that the process requires more time, which is why we suggest 12 months rather than six. We have seen the consequences of the hasty consultation process in which the Secretary of State is currently engaged.
Amendment No. 4 is consequential. Amendment No. 6 inserts the important condition that the alternative facilities shall be of a satisfactory standard. That is the amendment to which Lord Goodman spoke in another place.
Amendment No. 7 is one of the most important. We want the Secretary of State in deciding which 1,000 beds are to be phased out to ensure that those beds are used by National Health Service patients. We do not want the dust covers put on them. That would be a grievous insult to common sense and a total waste of resources.
We have given examples of where that has and might happen in certain hospitals with a shortage of resources. While that may satisfy the left wing of the Labour Party, it would be deplored by the general public.
We are delighted that, after repeated pressure by the Opposition, the Government have at last conceded and have produced an amendment. It would be churlish of us not to welcome that belated recognition of our arguments. It would be helpful if the Secretary of State would confirm that his amendment will preclude the use of private wings in hospitals as administrative offices, which is one solution that he suggested in Committee.
Amendment No. 69 relates to Schedule 2. We do not accept that 1,000 pay beds should be phased out and we do not accept the way that that is being done in the schedule. We believe that the allocation of cuts among the area health authorities is inconsistent with the criteria in Clause 4 and that the Lords amendment should be upheld.

12.15 p.m.

Mr. Kilroy-Silk: I was disappointed that the hon. Member for Ealing, Acton (Sir G. Young) spoiled an otherwise sincere speech by making churlish remarks about the left wing of the Labour Party. Of course we want pay beds to be phased out so that the beds can be made available to others in the National Health Service.
I join with the hon. Member in saying that private facilities should not be turned into administrative wings. The facilities should be used for National Health Service patients—that is the point of the Bill. It ill becomes the hon. Member to suggest that we want to end the pay bed system out of spite and to see the beds lying idle.
We strongly resist the Lords amendments. As it stands, the Bill would call for the separation of 1,000 pay beds by the end of six months. That in itself is not strong enough. Many of my hon. Friends feel deeply that the whole point of the Bill is to separate pay beds from the National Health Service and to end once and for all the division between the facilities and quality of care available in the Health Service and the much superior and quicker service available to private patients. We can end that anomaly and ensure that we have a Health Service free to be used only if we eliminate private practice entirely from the Service.
To suggest that ending even 1,000 pay beds in six months is a radical move in that direction is nonsense. It is not

sufficient. We want the Bill strengthened in that respect, even more as a result of that compromise effected by the ubiquitous Lord Goodman.
The Lords are suggesting not 1,000 beds eliminated within six months, but X number of beds phased out within 12 months. That is another delaying tactic and is a clear indication that they have no belief at all in the principles of the National Health Service or any intention of trying to make the Bill work. Their intention is to strike at the heart and core of the Bill and to destroy it.
If we are serious about the principles underlying the National Health Service and the Socialist philosophy behind it, we must be equally serious about dealing with the aberration and anomaly of pay beds. There cannot be any more compromise by the Government. We must go ahead clearly and determinedly to end pay beds in the National Health Service. For that reason, if for no other, we must strenuously resist these wrecking amendments.

Mrs. Barbara Castle: I entirely agree with my hon. Friend the Member for Ormskirk (Mr. Kilroy-Silk) that the purpose of all the Conservative amendments, faithfully embellished and echoed in another place, is to destroy the Bill. They are presented to us with all sorts of specious and selective arguments. Once again, the Opposition have quoted Lord Goodman in their aid when it suited them, carefully ignoring the essential parts of the compromise when they thought that they could.
Lord Goodman's approval of Amendment No. 6 was quoted. We have not had quoted to us his total silence on Amendment No. 3. He did not vote for it, and I have not the slightest doubt that he would consider that it was an unwise and disruptive amendment for their Lordships to press upon this House.
Therefore, I join my hon. Friend in thanking the Secretary of State for standing firm on this, as he has stood firm on all the principles of the Bill. To my hon. Friends who do not feel that the Bill goes far enough it must be some consolation to know the energy and verbosity with which the Opposition and their Lordships have fought it line by line. It proves that we are on our way to the fulfilment of the guiding principle of the Bill as set out


in Clause 2(1)—to separate private practice from the NHS.

Mr. Michael Shersby: I wish to speak with particular reference to the proposal to delete Schedule 2. What I am concerned about in my constituency is not so much the loss of the four pay beds mentioned in the second column of the schedule but the loss of 24 beds when my cottage hospital at Uxbridge closes in order to save £103,000 a year. The Hillingdon Area Health Authority has made that proposal because of the financial stringency in my borough.
My constituents are getting a very bad deal as a result of the Bill. They stand to lose 24 beds in an excellent cottage hospital, one with a long history of success and much loved in the community. In return, all that the Bill offers them is the number of beds to be withdrawn, a total of four. That is a matter of serious concern.
I do not propose to debate the principle of the Bill, with its effect of reducing NHS income, but the other element of the Lords amendment is very important—namely, that the Board shall submit to the Secretary of State proposals concerning the reduction of pay beds within the area. If Hillingdon is to lose the Uxbridge cottage hospital with its 24 pay beds—plus, I understand, a number of other vital hospitals in the London borough of Hillingdon—it is only right that any reduction in the number of pay beds should be a matter for consideration by the Board. It has a much more intimate knowledge of the local situation than the Secretary of State, with his many other responsibilities, can have.
I hope that the Minister can tell me what benefits my constituents will receive from this part of the Bill in return for losing their four beds. How will it benefit them when they stand to lose 24 beds at a very important cottage hospital providing the kind of facilities which are not easily provided in a large district hospital?

Mr. John Farr: It is sickening to listen to the Secretary of State as he pushes through a Left-wing Bill to abolish 1,000 pay beds, when he does not seem to understand the crying need of the National Health Service in the country as a whole. That need is

not for additional bed accommodation. Like other hon. Members, I have written to the right hon. Gentleman many times complaining about the lack of theatre space for certain operations. I have written to him time and again about, for instance, the fact that in some parts of the country an NHS patient must wait for up to three years for an orthopaedic operation.
Can the right hon. Gentleman get his head out of this mess of party dogma, forget his determination, come what may, to abolish 1,000 pay beds, and instead pay a little attention to the crying need of the Service—certainly in the East Midlands and I believe nationally—to provide more theatre accommodation? I have here a letter that I received yesterday. It is written by the chairman of the area division of orthopaedic surgery, Trent Region. He says:
while some small progress is being made in the direction of improving the facilities, I cannot foresee any improvement in the present situation of an ever-increasing waiting list for joint replacement surgery until provision is made for extra operating time.
That was written in response to the complaints I have continually conveyed to him.
Like nearly all my hon. Friends, I am a great supporter of the NHS, but we are tired of making excuses for it. We are fed up with having to send complaints to different Ministers when constituents say "I cannot afford to wait any longer. I must find a way to borrow the money to go private, because I cannot wait two or three years for an NHS operation". Time and again, my hon. Friends and I have pressed Ministers of both Governments to create a National Health Service that works. We should have a service of which we can be proud.
The Minister is not tackling the most important problem. The chairman of the area division of orthopaedic surgery is already applying considerable pressure for the provision of a second orthopaedic theatre within the area. He understands that new beds will be available in 1978, and says that if they are staffed there will be a very small improvement in the situation. He adds:
But the main problem is that joint replacement surgery requires a considerable amount of operating theatre time",
and he says that until a substantial amount of extra operating theatre space


is made available in the area, the waiting lists will continue to grow. That is a problem which concerns any hon. Member with a constituency interest.
We wish that the Secretary of State would forget this spiteful Bill and concentrate instead on what the general public wants, which is a proper Health Service in which people can have an NHS operation without having to wait so long that they have been known to die of old age before their turn comes.

Mr. Ennals: I was surprised by the remarks of the hon. Member for Harborough (Mr. Farr). He must know that, as a result of decisions taken by my right hon. Friend the Member for Blackburn (Mrs. Castle) to redistribute resources on a regional basis, the Trent Region has received additional resources—admittedly, at the expense of some other regions, particularly in London and the Thames regions, which are having to operate on a basis of nil growth or less. It ill behoves the hon. Gentleman, who comes from a region that is benefiting from the redistribution, to say that there is a crying need for more beds.

Mr. Farr: I said that there was a crying need for more theatre space, for more operating beds.

Mr. Ennals: It is for the region and the area to decide on the basis of their experience how best to allocate the resources at their disposal.
In the amendment we are dealing with the phasing out of 1,000 beds. It was recognised by all concerned that there was a great deal of under-utilisation of those beds, and it was acknowledged that the phasing out could be done by the Secretary of State. There was capacity available in the private sector.
Here it may be convenient to refer to the amendment in my name to Lords Amendment No. 7. In Lords Amendments Nos. 3 and 7, the other place put forward the idea that the beds released by the phasing out of 1,000 pay beds must be used for the benefit of NHS patients. The underlying principle was good but the wording was not acceptable. As it is clearly the wish that we should as far as is practicable make beds available to National Health Service patients—after all, that is the purpose of the whole operation—and improve the

service within the NHS, I felt it would be right to table the amendment. I am grateful to the hon. Member for Ealing, Acton (Sir G. Young) for recognising that.
12.30 p.m.
My noble Friend explained in another place that the amendments as we have received them from that place would not be acceptable. They fail to recognise the value that the released beds might have for day-patients. They insisted that they should be for in-patients use or in association with out-patient treatment. Moreover, it would be wrong and could lead to a wasteful use of staff to oblige hospitals in every case to use every one of these beds for in-patients, as the Lords amendments would have bound us to do.
However, I sympathise with the underlying points made in the Lords amendments and at a late stage yesterday I tabled an amendment in lieu which provides that
The Secretary of State shall so far as is practicable ensure that the beds released by the reduction made under this section are made available for the use of patients other than private patients.
I hope that the House will decide to approve the amendment.

Question put:—

The House divided: Ayes 274, Noes 249.

[For Division List No. 424 see c. 1815]

Question accordingly agreed to.

Lords Amendments Nos. 4, 5 and 6 disagreed to.

Lords Amendment No. 7 disagreed to.

Amendment made to the Bill in lieu
thereof: in page 3, line 30, at end insert—
' (3A) The Secretary of State shall so far as is practicable ensure that the beds released by the reduction under this section are made available for the use of patients other than private patients.'—[Mr. Moyle.]

Clause 4

FUNCTIONS OF BOARD AS REGARDS WITHDRAWAL OF NHS FACILITIES FROM PRIVATE PATIENTS

Lords amendment: No. 8, in page 3, line 38, leave out "progressive" and insert "grant or"

12.45 p.m.

Mr. Moyle: I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: With this we are to take Lords Amendments Nos. 9 to 12 and 15 to 20.

Mr. Moyle: I do not think that this matter need detain the House for long, not because it is a matter of no importance—it is of fundamental importance—but because I think that it shows a clear division of principle between the two sides of the House which can be readily and easily described.
It is the Government's policy to phase pay beds out of the National Health Service. It is the object of the Goodman proposals to do that. The Bill is the vehicle for achieving the phasing out of pay beds from the service, and the Health Board is the instrument for doing it.
The amendment seeks to conceive that the Board will say in its deliberations "we must withdraw some pay beds here, but perhaps there is a need for pay beds somewhere else, so we shall put some in there". That is not the job of the Board. Its job is to phase out pay beds from the service. It is clear in the objects of the Bill.
There may be one or two marginal cases. I refer in passing to Clause 5, whereby if there is a temporary cessation of the use of pay beds the Board may recommend alternative provision, and perhaps where some form of emergency reduces the number of pay beds in certain areas, again the Board may recommend some alternative provision in the aftermath of damage by fire, storm or something of that sort. However, apart from those two small exceptions, the object of the Bill is to phase out pay beds and it is the duty of the Health Board to do that. Therefore, I ask the House to reject the amendment.

Dr. Gerard Vaughan: The amendment is based on an amendment in Committee the vote on which was tied and which was never debated on Report in this House because it was guillotined. We feel very strongly that if the Government genuinely care about the care of patients and the quality of care, they should accept the amendment.
I am surprised that the Minister should say that it is only a matter of principle. It is much more than that. We feel that it is necessary that the Board should be free to give beds as well as to take them away, to be able if necessary to authorise new private beds within the NHS in areas in which they are needed, as well as to close them down. This is a very important and necessary aspect of flexibility for the Board to have.
We are concerned for three particular reasons. First, the Registrar-General's reports show that there are very great changes in the size of population in different areas, and it is very difficult now to forecast where all these changes will take place. Secondly, as the Minister knows from our discussions in Committee, we are very concerned about the new towns. We spent much time discussing Peterborough, for example, where there is an excellent modern hospital. However, that hospital is not big enough and does not have the facilities to cater for the extra people moving into that area.
We find it extraordinary that people are encouraged by the Government to move into a new area when we know that there is inadequate hospital provision for their health care, and that not only will there be no new provision for private facilties but there is no adequate NHS provision. This is a very serious situation.

Mr. Moyle: Will not the hon. Gentleman agree, therefore, that the priority should be to provide the facilities through the National Health Service before any question of pay beds arises?

Dr. Vaughan: No, I would not. If we look at the wording of the Goodman proposals, we find that the Government have accepted a responsibility to cover health more generally and to see that people who wish to have private facilities are still able to have them, certainly during the phasing-out period.
Thirdly, we are particularly concerned for the elderly and the mentally ill. We all know that the number of elderly patients will rise rapidly in the next few years. There will be inadequate provision for them. We are concerned, for example, for the people who wish to arrange for long-term private care for an elderly or a mentally sick person.
It is on these grounds that we oppose the Government and ask the House to accept the amendment.

Question put:—

The House divided: Ayes 278, Noes 253.

[For Division List No. 425 see c. 1819]

Question accordingly agreed to.

Lords amendments Nos. 9 to 12 disagreed to,

Lords amendment: No. 13, in page 4, line 21, leave out "and".

1.0 p.m.

Mr. Ennals: I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: It will be convenient to consider at the same time Lords Amendment No. 14.

Mr. Ennals: The effect of Lords Amendment No. 14 would be to require the Board to give reasons for its proposals for phasing out. The Government consider that that is quite unnecessary. The Board has to have regard to the four criteria set out in subsection (8) before making recommendations to the Secretary of State. It must also consider representations from those concerned with or interested in any proposals which it may make. The Board having discharged its obligations as an independent board, in the Government's view, there is no need for it to give reasons for its recommendations.
The task of the Board is to phase out pay beds. It might make more sense if the amendment required the Board to give reasons for not phasing out pay beds. In any case, the Board is, in effect, answerable to Parliament because its annual report will be presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State. It is my responsibility to lay the report before Parliament.

Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: It seems only fair that the Board should give its reasons, in the same way as virtually any Government Deartment or Minister gives reasons for decisions. It is laid down in the clause that the Board will consider representations from medical practitioners, dental practitioners or

persons employed in one or other of the national health services or concerned with the interests of patients at NHS hospitals.
Obviously, the Board would have to weigh the representations and make a decision accordingly. It seems only appropriate that, having made a decision, it should give its reasons.
I am grateful to the Secretary of State for having accepted at an earlier stage that exactly the same criteria should apply to the Scottish and Welsh Committees and that they also should have to take full account of representations made to them.
It seems only appropriate that the Board should act reasonably, just as reporters do at planning inquiries or as the Ombudsman or Government Departments do, and give reasons. I do not regard this as a matter of such pressing importance as to encourage my right hon. and hon. Friends to press it to a vote, but we wish to record our disagreement with the Government and express our view that the giving of reasons could do nothing but good.

Question put and agreed to.

Lords Amendments Nos. 14 to 20 disagreed to.

Lords amendment: No. 21, in page 6, line 8, after "facilities" insert "at a satisfactory standard".

Mr. Ennals: I beg to move. That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: I suggest that it will be convenient to consider at the same time Lords Amendments Nos. 22 and 23.

Mr. Ennals: The effect of the Lords amendment would be to require the Board to take into account the standard of alternative facilities in the private sector when considering proposals for the progressive revocation of authorisations of pay beds and other facilities for private practice. We discussed this issue for a long time in the Standing Committee.
In phasing out pay beds and facilities, the Board could have regard to the Government's intention to allow occasional admissions of patients privately to specialised NHS facilities if the particular services could not reasonably be provided in the private sector. Thus, the private sector will not be required to duplicate.
possibly in an unsatisfactory way, every sophisticated feature of the NHS.
The Secretary of State—in relation to the 1,000 beds—and the Board are obliged to look at the provision which is reasonably available in the private sector. This will inevitably involve a comparison with what is available in the private sector. In any case, the private sector is subject to control by registration under the Nursing Homes Act 1975. In the Government's view, it is unnecessary and unwise to make the proposed change.

Mr. Hal Miller: The Secretary of State gabbled through his departmental brief and failed entirely to deal with the nub of the matter which this group of amendments rightly raises, which goes to the heart of the Goodman proposals, as was admitted by the previous Minister of State in Standing Committee. What we are seeking to do here—as Baroness Young did in the other place—is to establish a basis of trust among patients, among the professions and among all who work in the Health Service as to how standards are to be maintained.
One vital element in that essential confidence is the Goodman proposals, which have been characterised in some neo-Marxist terminology as the proposals of 15th December but which are the Goodman proposals. The Goodman proposals make clear
that the Government are 'committed to the maintenance of private medical practice in this country' and ' intend to guarantee this in the legislation '".
We are seeking to establish by the amendments the extent to which that commitment is being honoured by the Government.
The Goodman proposals went on to say:
The criterion for phasing out"—
that is what we are discussing in Clause 4—
shall be the reasonable availability of reasonable alternative facilities … within a reasonable geographical distance and to which reasonable access is available to those patients and practitioners desiring to avail themselves of it".
There is no point in pretending that there is an alternative if it is not accessible and is not
within a reasonable geographical distance".

These amendments deal with the standard at which the alternative facilities are available and the question of accessibility, together with the matter of cost, which is another important criterion of reasonable availability.
In Committee the Minister said that the Goodman proposals were subject to the interpretation of complex criteria. That is the point with which we are dealing today. How are the Government interpreting those criteria? Unless that is clearly established, there can be no basis of confidence and trust.
It is disappointing that in Committee the previous Minister of State appeared to go a little further than the Secretary of State has been able to go today when discussing the point about the matching of private facilities with the withdrawal of National Health Service facilities. His remarks on that subject are reported in column 602 of the Official Report of the Standing Committee proceedings on 29th June.
We understood that there would be consultation with the professions on improvements, for example, in the standards of private sector provision. I am sure that the Secretary of State would not wish to take the position of not caring about the standards of provision available in the private sector. I accept that the Government see no responsibility for maintaining the private sector, but I am sure that the right hon. Gentleman would wish to address himself to the question of standards in the private sector. His rejection of the amendment would seem to suggest that he is not exercising that responsibility.

Mr. Ennals: The hon. Gentleman will know that the private sector is subject to control under the Nursing Homes Act 1975. To require the Health Services Board to fulfil that function would be a duplication. It would put on it a burden much greater than would be tolerable.

Mr. Miller: In Committee the former Minister of State appeared not to accept that the control exercised under the Nursing Homes Act 1975 was adequate. He went on to say that the Government had made clear that they were prepared to consider what improvements might be made. We are trying to pin down the


Secretary of State to saying how far the consultations have progressed and what improvements are considered to be necessary. The right hon. Gentleman has made no attempt to reply to that.

1.15 p.m.

Mr. Ennals: The point I tried to make was that this is not and should not be the responsibility of the Board.

Mr. Miller: It is apparent that the Secretary of State is not willing to address himself to the question of the standard that should be available. That is all the more surprising because Clause 8(2) deals with the power of the Secretary of State to refuse private patients admission to NHS hospitals
unless satisfied that the accommodation or services … required
are not privately available, or, if they are available, are
not privately available there at a place which is reasonably accessible
or
available at a satisfactory standard".
Therefore, even the Government's own Bill lays down two of the criteria which the amendments seek to establish. We cannot understand why the Government are reneging on their clear responsibilities. What is the meaning of "reasonable availability" if it does not cover those elements?
I wish to deal with some of the earlier remarks of the Secretary of State. His sham indignation about the action of the House of Lords in seeking to establish the criteria on which the Bill and the Goodman proposals were framed and his remarks about the will of the people do not accord with the opinion poll commissioned in the summer, which was discussed in Committee and which showed clearly that most Labour voters and trade unionists were opposed to everything that the Government were trying to do by the Bill. Happily, that was confirmed by the recent by-election results at Workington and Walsall. So let us have no more of the right hon. Gentleman's sham indignation and no more remarks by the hon. Member for Bolsover (Mr. Skinner) about fighting a phoney war. The Government are about to realise that it is for real.

Mr. Patrick Jenkin: I wish to express my grave disappointment that the Sec-

retary of State has not been able to accept these amendments. As he knows, Lord Goodman commended amendments in this sense when he spoke on Second Reading in another place. Indeed, he went further. He said that he had discussed them with the Secretary of State and had gained the impression from the right hon. Gentleman's reaction that he would have liked to have accepted the amendments.
Lord Goodman spelled out—and it would be out of order to quote what he said—why it would cost the Government nothing to give this small extra assurance to the medical profession that the Health Services Board would have to have regard to the standard of the alternative accommodation and that it should be reasonably accessible to the practitioner as well as to the patient.
Somebody has got at the Secretary of State and has persuaded him that this would be a concession which perhaps his hon. Friends below the Gangway would not accept. They would be unwise to bring any such pressure on the Secretary of State, and I hope that even now the right hon. Gentleman will indicate that if this amendment returns to another place he will be prepared to consider it and accept it before it comes back to this House. This is an eminently sensible amendment which Lord Goodman suggested would cost the Government nothing and its acceptance would be immensely reassuring to the profession.

Mr. Ennals: I make it clear that at no stage and in no context did I suggest that I was prepared to accept this amendment. Nor have I been under pressure from any of my hon. Friends.

Question put:—

The House proceeded to a Division—

Mr. Deputy Speaker: I should let the House know that I have had a report that the Bells were not ringing at the time the Division was called. They have now started to ring, and the Division will be timed from now.

The House having divided: Ayes: 279, Noes 247.

[For Division List No. 426 see c. 1823]

Question accordingly agreed to.

Lords Amendments 22 and 23 disagreed to.

Mr. F. P. Crowder (Ruislip-North-wood): On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. For the purpose of the record, there are no Labour Members present, apart from the Parliamentary Private Secretary, the Minister and his assistant—

Mr. Deputy Speaker: Order. The hon. and learned Gentleman is well aware that that is not a matter for the Chair.

Lords amendment: No. 24, in page 6, line 13, leave out paragraph (c).

1.30 p.m.

Mr. Ennals: I beg to move, That this House does disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: With this we may take Lords Amendments Nos. 25, 26 and 27.

Mr. Ennals: It is nice to have the hon. and learned Member for Ruislip-North-wood (Mr. Crowder) with us. Presumably he felt that he ought to come back because we had a substantially increased majority on the last vote. We improve steadily as we go along.
The principal purpose of this group of amendments is not in the initial amendment, which would remove the third of the four principles. The main amendment is No. 26, which would add an additional principle for the Board to consider in making its proposals, namely, that revocation would be permissible only if those trying to provide alternative facilities have not met unreasonable obstruction from planning authorities or others.
The proposed additional principle would require the Board to form a view whether local planning authorities were exercising their planning powers reasonably and where it considered they were not doing so to withhold proposals for revoking pay bed authorisation.
This would be most inappropriate in legislation. In any case, it is unnecessary because there is a right of appeal against planning permission to the Secretary of State for the Environment and, in certain circumstances, to the court. It would be inappropriate for the Board to involve itself in these matters.
For these reasons, I certainly oppose that amendment as well as the others in the group.

Mr. Boscawen: The purpose of the four amendments, which we support, is to ensure that the private sector gets a fair chance to set up alternative accommodation. Although subsection (8)(c) was lifted straight out of the Goodman compromise proposals almost unamended, we feel that it could be taken in any way one liked to read it. It could well be taken to indicate that the Board need pay no attention to what efforts are being made to provide reasonable accommodation outside. It could be read in exactly the opposite way to that which is intended. It is badly drafted. That is why both in Committee and in the other place we felt that the Bill would be better if that subsection were taken out.
It will be extremely hard in some areas of private facilities to replace pay beds. It may take a long time to do so, particularly in the present financial crisis. We do not want the Board in any way to start rushing the phasing out of private beds when there is a possibility that in a few years' time—when conditions may be better—the private sector will be able to set up alternative facilities in order to improve the area of choice for all patients.
Our objection to the Bill is that it limits the area of choice in health care available to the citizen. If the Government persist with both paragraphs (c) and (d), they are saying that rather than wanting separation they want total abolition of private health care.
That is the message that we wish to put across. The whole point of the compromise is to achieve separation of a continued thriving private sector of health care in the country in order to give citizens better freedom of choice to have the doctor they wish to have.
We believe that Amendment No. 26, which is an insertion into the Bill, is a reasonable one. It would be quite wrong for the Board to allow pay beds to be phased out in an area where the private sector was trying to obtain facilities in order to keep the opportunities available for private practice in that area. We do not feel that it is interfering in the judgment of a local authority for the Board


to take into account that planning permission for alternative accommodation may have been obstructed.
We have had warnings, particularly by NALGO, that planning permission for alternative accommodation in respect of large hospitals over 100 beds in the London area and 75 beds outside would be obstructed. This provision should be kept in the Bill.
Amendment No. 27 is an entirely new one, of which none of us thought in Committee over all those long months, but it is very important. We want to ensure that patients continue to be able to obtain the kind of doctor or treatment that they have been used to outside the NHS, once separation has taken place. That is a reasonable attitude. If a large number of, say, Roman Catholics in an area have been used to going to a Roman Catholic consultant who can use pay beds in an NHS hospital, the Board should ensure that there are private facilities outside where a Roman Catholic consultant can practise or is practising before pay beds in that area are phased out.
This is a blow that we should try to strike for freedom. Patients must be able to continue to choose the kind of doctor they want. It has been suggested that this is a wrecking amendment, but I do not agree. It refers to a "substantial reduction" in the freedom of patients. In other words, we want facilities offered outside similar to those which private patients in NHS hospitals were getting before. It is a good amendment and I invite my hon. Friends to vote for it.

Mr. Patrick Jenkin: I would emphasise what my hon. Friend the Member for Wells (Mr. Boscawen) has said about Amendment No. 27. This is a new point which was accepted in another place, with support not only from the Cross-Benches but also from the Bishops' Bench. It was stressed as of importance, for instance, to Roman Catholics. It was said that, if one of the results of phasing out pay beds was a substantial reduction in the freedom of patients to choose a doctor of the religion or of of the race or language of their own, that factor should be taken into account by the Health Services Board.
The Secretary of State—certainly this is true of his noble Friend in another place—appears to persist in misunderstanding both the language and the purpose of the amendment. There is no suggestion that a Nigerian should be expected to go to a Nigerian doctor or an Indian to an Indian doctor. People should simply have the freedom to choose. Many do not have choice, but that is no reason for reducing the ambit of choice. We want to widen it.
If the effect of the Bill is to reduce choice—for instance, the choice of a woman to be treated by a woman consultant or a Roman Catholic to be treated by a Roman Catholic consultant—that would be just one more diminution of the right of patients to choose the kind of medical care they want.
The Secretary of State has not spoken on this amendment. I hope that he will undertake to consider it carefully because it seems to be one of some importance. I commend it to him.

Mr. Ennals: The hon. Member for Wells (Mr. Boscawen) somewhat misinterpreted the four criteria. It is the Government's aim to give the private sector a reasonable opportunity to provide its own facilities, where necessary, before phasing out pay beds. We have sought to write that in, in terms which I think represent that aim.
However, on paragraph (d), which their Lordships have also sought to delete, I said in Committee that it is not the Government's intention to allow pay beds to continue where the private sector is unwilling to take the necessary steps to provide decent facilities. Of course there is a responsibility on the private sector, so far as it wishes, to provide its own facilities. It cannot simply, by failure to do so, frustrate the purposes of the Bill.
I do not think that my noble Friend misunderstood Amendment No. 27. The reason for opposing it is that it puts an impossible task upon the Board and is absolutely outside the intended scope of its activities. In practice, more often than not, the patient's freedom of choice is already limited by the advice and information of his private doctor. Of course he is free to ask for a second opinion, but for that he would need in almost every case to go back to his family practitioner for guidance and advice.
Therefore, if a patient has already chosen—for reasons of sex, religion, colour or language—a particular family practitioner, he can return to him if he is dissatisfied. That situation would not be changed by the phasing out of pay beds. It would be almost impossible for the Board to fulfil that responsibility and I cannot offer to reconsider the matter. I have considered it carefully and this is not an amendment which it would be reasonable to accept.

Question put and agreed to.

Mr. Speaker: We have been discussing a group of amendments. I understand that the Opposition would like to divide on Lords Amendment No. 27.

Mr. Patrick Jenkin: indicated assent.

Mr. Speaker: With permission of the House, and only with permission of the House, I will put the Question on Lords Amendments Nos. 25 and 26 together.

Lords Amendments Nos. 25 and 26 disagreed to.

Lords amendment: No. 27, in page 6, line 30, at end insert—
() that the authorisation of any such accommodation or services under those provisions for use in that connection should not be revoked if the revocation would result in a substantial reduction in the freedom of resident or non-resident hospital patients to engage the services of medical or dental practitioners of the sex, race, colour, language, religion or national or social origin of their choice.

Motion made, and Question put. That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment:—

The House divided: Ayes 277, Noes 254.

[For Division List No. 427 see c. 1827]

Question accordingly agreed to.

Clause 5

RESTRICTIONS ON SECRETARY OF STATE'S POWERS UNDER SS. 1 AND 2 OF 1968 ACT

Lords Amendment: No. 28, in page 6, line 42, leave out from "granted" to end of line 45 and insert "or".

2.0 p.m.

Mr. Moyle: I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.

Mr. Speaker: With this we may take Lords Amendments Nos. 29, 30 and 31.

Mr. Moyle: I do not think that the House need be detained long on this group of amendments. Although they touch on an important principle, the House has already passed judgment on that principle earlier today. We do not see any need to extend the grounds upon which the Health Services Board may authorise new pay beds on the ground that the rôle of the Board is to phase out pay beds from the National Health Service. That is the task which it must perform under the Bill.
Some provision has been made for meeting emergencies and short-term and temporary closures. In those circumstances, we feel that there is no need to accept the group of amendments which the other place moved to extend the grounds of the authorisations.

Mr. Patrick Jenkin: The Minister will not be surprised that I disagree with almost everything he said, with one exception. I agree that the principle in these amendments was covered by earlier amendments considered in the debates in which my hon. Friend the Member for Reading, South (Dr. Vaughan) took part when we discussed whether new beds should be authorised in place of hospitals which are closed down. The Minister is absolutely right when he says that the principle in this group of amendments is exactly the same. Although we would dearly wish these amendments to be included in the Bill—there is no doubt about that—I am not sure that I should be justified in asking my right hon. and hon. Friends to divide the House on the issue.

Question put and agreed to.

Lords Amendments Nos. 29 to 31 disagreed to.

Lords amendment: No. 32, in page 8, line 2, leave out "may" and insert "shall".

Mr. Moyle: I beg to move, That this House doth agree with the Lords in the said amendment.

Mrs. Renée Short: The Minister is slipping.

Mr. Moyle: I regret that I do not have 100 per cent. support for my motion. The Government have considered the amendment moved by another place to insert "shall" instead of "may" when it comes to authorising additional pay beds in certain circumstances. We do not intend to disagree with the amendment.
The effect of the amendment is to require instead of to enable the Secretary of State to grant temporary authorisations for pay beds or for private out-patient facilities if a hospital, which is still entitled to have authorised pay beds or outpatient facilities, is temporarily closed as a result of some physical event outside the Secretary of State's control, such as fire, flood, infection, landslide, act of God, or similar event. That means that the total number of authorised pay beds or out-patient facilities at any time will be kept at that level, but not in any circumstances increased, and will not be reduced by any of the emergencies which I have mentioned.
Obviously, as the operations of the Health Services Board proceed and the number of pay beds in the NHS is reduced, the opportunities for authorisation will be reduced. That does not necessarily mean that the authorisations would be operated if the time were short. But there will certainly be the requirement to authorise the appropriate substitute pay beds.

Mr. Patrick Jenkin: I thank the Minister for a small, but valuable concession. I am particularly grateful since his noble Friend the Baroness Stedman was very forthright when she said:
There really is no reason for making this permissive power mandatory".—[Official Report, House of Lords, 10th November 1976; c. 499.]
The Minister has shown that he has an open mind on these matters.
It is entirely right to make this provision mandatory. If, for instance, a hospital which has pay beds is burned down or becomes infected and has to be closed by the Secretary of State, he may temporarily authorise pay beds in another hospital to replace them. This seems a necessary requirement. We should not

leave it permissive as it is in the Bill. I thank the Minister for his open-minded-ness on this issue.

Question put and agreed to.

Clause 6

RECOMMENDATIONS ON ARRANGEMENTS FOR SECURING USE OF NHS FACILITIES ON BASIS OF MEDICAL PRIORITY

Lords amendment: No. 33, in page 8, line 45, at end insert—
'"(4) The Board shall make no recommendation which (were it to be carried into effect) would or might require any medical or dental practitioner to disclose to any person any information obtained by him in confidence from any patient (whether resident or non-resident and whether private or not) and the Secretary of State shall not carry into effect any recommendation which would or might require any such disclosure

Mr. Moyle: I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.
In saying that we disagree with the Lords, we do not disagree that there is a problem here and that in principle the confidentiality of medical records should be preserved. We merely disagree with the concept that it should be protected by such an inflexible method as legislation.
Clause 6 makes provision for the Health Services Board to bring forward proposals for common waiting lists containing both private and National Health Service patients and ensuring that admission to health facilities is on the basis of medical priority only.
Obviously there will have to be a great deal of discussion of the various ailments from which the patients are suffering to assess the degree of medical priority. I understand the desire of doctors and patients to ensure that, as far as possible, confidential medical information is not freely bandied about in the process. The Government recognise that anxiety.
However, the proposal by their Lordships that this should be done by adding subsection (4) to the clause, is not the appropriate way of going about it. There are many occasions in the Health Service on which confidential information about patients and in-patients' records have to be considered to assess clinical requirements. We have been content, as a


House and a country, to rely on the code of ethics of the professions dealing with this problem. The Government's view is that it is best to rely on the judgment of the professions as to how far they may go in this matter by using their judgment based on their general code of ethics.
Although we feel that there is a problem in principle here which has to be solved, we would prefer to leave it to the professions. We feel that it would be wrong to bind the Health Services Board tightly by a legislative provision where such a move has never before been thought necessary to protect the interests of patients or the profession.

Mr. Boscawen: I find that a disturbing and disappointing statement. I do not want to go over the very long debate we had on the whole waiting list problem in Committee and the further long debate we had in the other place about the worst manifestation of a deteriorating service in the public sector—the appalling waiting list problem.
It is a terrible reflection on this country that 44,000 people have been waiting for more than a year for non-urgent operations. We ought to be concentrating on and doing something about that problem. We should not be concentrating on this sideshow of a Bill which will not improve the waiting list problem.
There is no division in the House in the argument that blatant queue-jumping with the aid of a cheque book when there are no other factors involved is totally unacceptable. The Opposition have always agreed that. However, we do not agree that this Bill is the right way to overcome the problem. Government supporters must realise that the basis of medical priority alone will create considerable difficulties now that it is being written into a statute. It does not matter what is put in the statute. Medical priority will always include social grounds. Social grounds have always been taken into account by doctors and hospitals making up their waiting lists, and they will continue to be.
A new situation will arise now. The Bill may mean that in a common waiting list situation there will be a dispute about why one patient is put before another in a certain hospital. As a result, there will be pressure on doctors to reveal their reasons for placing that patient ahead of

another patient on the waiting list. This is a new situation, and it may be necessary in the future to safeguard the long-established rights of members of the medical profession and others engaged in health care in terms of the complete confidentiality between patient and doctor and patient and nurse which has always been taken for granted in the past but which may be disputed under pressure in the future.
The Government should think again about this issue. A good deal of dispute could arise in the future in trying to introduce a common waiting list. We all know that it will be very difficult. The waiting list problem is immensely complicated. It does not offer an easy solution, and we do not want to make it worse by bringing pressure to bear on doctors. I do not believe that they will abuse the situation. They will not conceal deliberately the reason why a patient has been put ahead of another patient on the list. It is a great pity that we have spelt this out in the Bill, because dispute is bound to arise.

Mr. Moyle: I am not sure how the hon. Gentleman can argue that the situation will be a new one. Regrettably, we have waiting lists now. Sometimes they are much too long. But doctors have to assess the priorities of people on the waiting list, anyway. They have managed to do so within the terms of their present code of ethics. Most people are on a common waiting list, in any event.

Mr. Boscawen: There is a new situation. We are interposing an outside independent board to set up a system of a common waiting list. That board will have to police its common waiting list and decide how it shall work. Somewhere, at some time, someone is bound to dispute it. In that dispute, there is bound to be cause for the doctor to reveal why he placed an individual in a certain position of the list, either on the day of the operation or during the month or year. There is a new situation. I hope that the hon. Gentleman will recognise it and realise that, if the Bill goes through as it is, the Government will have to answer for the consequences.

2.15 p.m.

Mr. Leslie Spriggs: I wish to draw attention to the existing


situation in the St. Helens and Knowsley area health authority district where I am informed that a private hospital is under construction at a time when nursing levels in other hospitals in the area are at a dangerously low level.
Apart from professional people in the National Health Service such as doctors, nurses and ancillary workers, we have a situation where, if the Minister is encouraged to accept any amendments to the Bill as it is at present, standards of care are in danger of being adversely affected. Hon. Members representing constituencies in the area are worried already about what those standards are likely to be in the future should an amendment be accepted which will affect the intake of nursing staff and others. In my view, my hon. Friend ought to resist with all his strength any amendment to this clause.

Mr. Boscawen: I appreciate that the hon. Gentleman is trying to help the Minister, but I do not see how my amendment dealing with confidentiality can upset the doctors and nurses in that area. I think that it will have the opposite effect, because they want it.

Mr. Spriggs: If I have followed the hon. Gentleman's argument, any amendment to the Bill will enable other authorities such as private health authorities to compete for the necessary staff to man new hospitals in the area.

Mr. Pavitt: I am very glad to hear that my hon. Friend the Minister of State is resisting this amendment. As the hon. Member for Wells (Mr. Boscawen) rightly pointed out, this part of the Bill which their Lordships seek to amend is one of the most constructive provisions. It arises because of the lack of success of the former Minister of State in his strong attempts to negotiate with the medical profession to secure common waiting lists without the need for legislation. For that reason, the whole of this clause is vitally necessary.
As a layman, I very much resent the idea that a doctor should not be accountable for his decisions over a wide range of matters including the way in which his waiting list is prepared. The essential objective of this amendment from the Lords is to argue that, because of the need for confidentiality in respect of both

the clinical and the social reasons why a doctor selects one patient for admission before another, for some reason we cannot rely on the common sense of the medical profession whose members have been doing this for years and, therefore, need to write some provision into the statute to give them protection. From my knowledge of the medical profession, I know that this is nonsense. From the time that they qualify, automatically they have this responsibility to their patients. They do not need to have words written into legislation providing for confidentiality to be maintained.

Mr. Patrick Jenkin: I cannot think that the hon. Gentleman has read the amendment from another place. It is not that the doctor is being required to preserve confidentiality. It is that other people should not be entitled to make recommendations requiring the doctor to breach the confidentiality. It is entirely the other way round.

Mr. Pavitt: It is precisely because I have read the amendment that I intervene.
As for the common waiting list problem, in the past the way in which a person has been admitted for in-patient or out-patient treatment has rested solely on the clinical decision of the doctor concerned. As the hon. Member for Wells (Mr. Boscawen) said, when a number of candidates are waiting for admission for hernia or varicose vein operations, other conditions need to be considered.
If we are to have the kind of National Health Service that we want, we must have a hospital service which is based on team work and not on the old system where the consultant was God Almighty. Their Lordships are seeking to preserve the pre-eminence of the past where the only person making any decision was the consultant—not even his registrar or his team. Once again the Lords are trying to preserve this outdated system.
Inevitably there will be many pressures, not least from the community health councils, for a fairer waiting list system. At present, the case-hardened consultant has a quick way out if faced with 10 patients with equal claims. He can base his decision on who can pay the bill. That saves him many problems. As usual, the Lords are proposing an amendment which is unnecessary and which


complicates the Bill. It proves the case for abolishing the House of Lords.

Mr. A. P. Costain: I hope that the Minister will think again. Surely hon. Members appreciate the importance of confidentiality between patient and doctor. The whole process depends upon it. Unless we accept the amendment, the patient will always wonder, however well meant the doctor, whether the Board, which will include laymen, might insist upon the doctor breaking confidentiality by telling it from what the patient suffers. It will break down the most important confidence between patient and doctor. Confidentiality must be retained and no one should be allowed to overrule it.

Mr. Rooker: The confidence between patients and doctors which was created by the passing of the Bill in the form in which it left the House has now been destroyed by the Lords. Patients know that doctors can put pressures on them to jump the queue by paying the bill.
One of my constituents will considerably benefit from the Bill so long as the amendment is not passed. I shall not name her because her case is being considered by the Birmingham Area Health Authority. Hon. Members will know that general practitioners are sometimes also hospital consultants.
My constituent is a lady in her sixties who is having trouble with her eyes. Her family doctor referred her to the Birmingham Eye Hospital, where he is consultant. One of her eyes is deteriorating rapidly. Two years ago, her family doctor told her that both eyes would be treated together when that was necessary. That was her GP in his capacity as consultant. She did not see him between September 1975 and September this year, and she was told that the reason for the 12-month delay was the industrial action by consultants. I do not know why that should have caused such a long delay.
My constituent's daughter visited her GP from time to time during that year, told him that her eye was deteriorating and collected prescriptions for her. In September this year my constituent had an appointment to see her own GP at the Birmingham Eye Hospital. The lady is now blind in one eye. Her GP, in his role as consultant, told her that it would

be two years before treatment could be given. But he added that he could deal with it in six months if she could pay £400 or £500. Where is that the doctor's medical priority? That story should convince the ragbag of the Opposition and the Lords that the Bill must remain as it was when it left this House.
It is disgraceful that a doctor-cum-consultant should behave in that way. I do not know whether he is fit to be a GP if that is the way in which he makes decisions. He has blackmailed this lady and told her that she will have to wait two years unless she can cross his palm with silver worth £400 or £500.

Mr. Spriggs: Many Labour Members believe that that GP is not fit to be a doctor.

Mr. Rooker: I will if necessary say that outside the House after the health authority reports. I intend to send the facts of the case to my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State when the area health authority comes up with an answer, whatever it may be. Perhaps in the meantime medical priorities will change and my constituent will be treated under the National Health Service and that will be the end of the problem.

Mr. Kilroy-Silk: Does my hon. Friend accept that we all have cases such as that? I am sure that Opposition Members could quote them, too, if they chose. The case graphically demonstrates that unless we eradicate all vestige of commercialism from the National Health Service, abuses such as this will continue. It is an argument in favour of ensuring that there is no taint of profit or commercialism within the Service, and that all cases should be dealt with in the strict terms of medical priority.

Mr. Rooker: It would be outrageous for the Lords amendment to be retained. Corrupt practices will be encouraged because doctors will not have to disclose information. The myths about the ethics of the medical profession that we hear of from the Opposition are rubbish. I am not tainting all doctors, because the great majority are good servants to their patients, but there are some who are not.
I have quoted one example, but there are others. I am sure that Opposition


Members could give examples, but they do not want to do so. Perhaps they have an interest in not doing that. They, too, must receive letters from their constituents. This is not a party matter.
The only way to solve the problem is to take decisions of that kind out of the hands of the doctors. I have every confidence in a board of independent people laying down medical priorities. I am confident that such a board would make decisions fairly. It would take away from the doctors the taint of corruption and blackmail of the elderly, sick, poor and needy. In the case I mentioned, the lady was never asked whether she could afford £400 or £500. The doctor wanted to screw £400 or £500 out of my constituent for her to jump the queue.
That is not medical priority. I invite the right hon. Member for Wanstead and Woodford (Mr. Jenkin) or the hon. Member for Reading, South (Dr. Vaughan) on the Opposition Front Bench to refute what I have said, but they do not rise. They clearly have a vested interest in silence today. We have already seen that with six Divisions in three and a half hours and virtually no debate.
There is no great opposition to the Bill. No case for the amendment is advanced. Why do we go through this charade, with all the propaganda outside the House, with Conservative Members saying that they want the doctors to decide, that matters of confidence between them and their patients are of supreme importance? They say "We have made that case in Parliament. We went to the House on Friday 19th November, the last but one day of the Session, and fought to the death to protect confidence between doctor and patient."
2.30 p.m.
Half the Opposition are missing when the Divisions are called. Tory Members are moaning because they want to be away by 5 o'clock, and therefore they do not want to debate this amendment. No one seeks to intervene in my small contribution, even when I invite comment on my view that the amendment would add to the corrupt practices in the medical profession.
When I explain the position of my constituent who is blind in one eye and describe what has been said by her GP,

wearing his other hat as a consultant, Tory Members laugh. I shall be interested in the reactions of my constituent, the doctor and the area health authority when they receive copies of today's Hansard. I shall also be interested in the reaction of the local Press. The hon. Member for Birmingham, Edgbaston (Mrs. Knight) is not here today. She has plenty of complaints about the Birmingham Eye Hospital and the waiting lists. She is always making a case in the local Press about lack of NHS facilities.
We have no case to answer against disagreeing with this Lords amendment.

Mr. Patrick Jenkin: If the facts turn out to be as the hon. Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr (Mr. Rooker) stated them—and he admitted that he would not say outside the House what he has just said until he had ascertained the facts—I believe that he has very good grounds for referring the doctor in question to the General Medical Council. No Conservative Member has ever sought to deny that there are abuses or to defend them. On the contrary, our argument all along has been that in order to check the abuses to which the Select Committee drew attention the Government have taken a sledgehammer which will do grave damage to the NHS and the NHS patient.
There is no need for the Bill in order to deal with the abuse that the hon. Gentleman described. If he had sat through the many hours of debate in Committee, and had read the Official Report of the debates in another place, he could not have said what in fact he said. To charge the Opposition with heedlessness of the interest of the NHS or the NHS patient is sheer impudence.

Mr. Pavitt: On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I am a little concerned, on grounds of medical priorities, about the hon. and learned Member for Ruislip-Northwood (Mr. Crowder). I hope that he is quite well, because I think that, to judge by his appearance, he is no longer with us.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: I am happy to say that the health of hon. Members is not the responsibility of the Chair.

Mrs. Renee Short: I was interested to hear the right hon. Gentleman admit, for the first time from the Conservative


Benches, that such abuses as were mentioned by my hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr (Mr. Rooker) exist. His hon. Friend the Member for Reading, South (Dr. Vaughan) has never admitted that one of the ways in which doctors pressure patients to go private and pay fees is to allow the waiting list to mount. The case quoted by my hon. Friend is symptomatic and typical of hundreds and hundreds of similar cases. If the right hon. Gentleman says that the Bill is unnecessary to deal with that kind of abuse, how would he deal with it?

Mr. Jenkin: I hardly think that at this stage in the Bill's passage it would be appropriate for me to respond to the hon. Lady's question. She was here for the Second Reading debate, so she will know that I was extremely frank then about the results of the study undertaken by her Select Committee. I have said all along that the Bill is not the way to deal with the matter. It is not necessary to get rid of the geographical whole-time consultant in order to eliminate the abuses. It is sheer rubbish for the hon. Lady to suggest that we have today said for the first time, in answer to the hon. Member for Perry Barr, that there are abuses. I invite her to study the Official Report of the Committee stage.

Mr. Stan Thorne: The Opposition did not say it in Committee.

Mr. Jenkin: Of course we did. The hon. Gentleman knows perfectly well that what I have said all along is that it is absolute folly to force consultants to divide their time between the NHS hospitals and the private clinics outside simply to get rid of the few black sheep. I welcome the fact that the hon. Member for Perry Barr said that it was only a tiny minority of doctors who engaged in these undesirable practices. The whole arrangement set up by Aneurin Bevan 30 years ago is to be swept out of the window to deal with that tiny minority. That is rank bad government. The Government should never have yielded to this pressure.

Mr. Ennals: The right hon. Gentleman was not prepared to answer the question put by my hon. Friend the Member for Wolverhampton, North-East (Mrs. Short). We are dealing with the matter of common waiting lists. Does the right hon. Gentleman accept that once the Bill

become law, and common waiting lists have come forward from the Board, the injustice described by my hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr (Mr. Rooker) will not be possible, and that this legislation will have brought that about?

Mr. Jenkin: As I told the right hon. Gentleman on Report, if he had introduced a Bill to deal with abuses and to establish an inquiry into the feasibility of common waiting lists he would have found himself with an agreed measure. We did not divide against Clause 6 in Committee. We spoke in favour of it, and my hon. Friend the Member for Wells (Mr. Boscawen) made a penetrating and profound speech analysing the whole question of waiting lists. To pretend at this late stage that the Opposition have condoned the abuses is utter nonsense, and the right hon. Gentleman knows it. He should not be supporting his hon. Friends below the Gangway in that kind of slur on the Opposition.

Question put:—

The House divided: Ayes 283, Noes 248.

[For Division List No. 428 see c. 1833]

Question accordingly agreed to.

Clause 7

SECRETARY OF STATE'S POWERS TO PRO VIDE SERVICES ETC. OTHERWISE THAN FOR PURPOSES OF SERVICES UNDER NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE ACTS

Lords amendment: No. 34, in page 9. line 19, leave out "satisfied" and insert "advised by the Board".

Mr. Ennals: I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: With this we are to take Lords Amendments Nos. 35 to 37.

Mr. Ennals: This amendment is a monstrous onslaught upon my powers as Secretary of State. The very fact that the right hon. Member for Wanstead and Woodford (Mr. Jenkin) is supporting this monstrous onslaught must mean that he never himself expects to hold office. I congratulate him on retaining his very shadowy post.
The amendment provides that the Secretary of State could exercise the powers conferred upon him in the three NHS Acts of 1946, 1947 and 1968, to make supplies of blood, human tissues, accommodation and services, and so on, and supplies of goods, available to the private sector, only if he has been advised by the Board that use of the powers would not to a significant extent interfere with his duties to provide accommodation and service to NHS patients and would not to a significant extent operate to the disadvantage of NHS patients.
This would be an absolute bureaucracy. The Opposition are attempting to put responsibilities on the Board which it would be quite improper for the Board to have and would require of it an absolutely unnecessary cost and number of staff. The amendment would make the Board responsible for advising the Secretary of State on matters on which it would not be competent to give advice.
In addition to making facilities available to the private sector, the relevant sections of the Acts cover the use of NHS supply departments, kitchens, laundries and so on. The amendment would require that many decisions at present taken at a local level by district and area authorities should be referred to the Board. Inevitably, it would cause delay and disruption of services to the private sector, which the Opposition are trying to protect.
It is an absurd amendment which I urge hon. Members not to press any further.

Mr. Patrick Jenkin: The right hon. Gentleman has used quite unjustifiably strong language to describe an amendment that falls within the main stream of the theme of the Goodman proposals, as he has sought to embody them in the Bill. That is that interposed between the National Health Service and the Minister there should be an independent Board to adjudicate in those areas in which there is likely to be conflict, as he sees it, arising out of the use for private patients of NHS facilities.
All that another place has sought to do is to say not that the Board should take the decision but that the Board should advise the Secretary of State, and that that should apply to the provision of the services that the Secretary of State

has just described—the availability of blood from a blood bank, human tissues and other services of that nature which may be available from the NHS.
It is a matter for judgment when difficulties arise and questions crop up as to whether NHS patients are being in any way prejudiced by the supplies that a particular hospital may have been accustomed to make for private patients whether it would not be unreasonable for the Secretary of State in those circumstances to take the advice of the Board, which, after all, will have the duty of holding the balance.
That is the case that the Government have consistently made for the Bill. I think that on reflection the right hon. Gentleman might regret the somewhat extreme language that he used to describe the amendments. To some extent the point is the same as that which arises on the next group of amendments, on Clause 8, which concerns the much more important area of policy on the use of specialised surgical and medical facilities in hospitals.
In these circumstances, as we are constrained by time, perhaps I need not advise my right hon. and hon. Friends to vote on Lords Amendment No. 34. Nevertheless, it is not the foolish amendment that the Secretary of State has suggested. It has been put forward in good faith, and I regret very much the language that the right hon. Gentleman used about it.
The only other point that arises is that on Lords Amendments Nos. 35 and 36. I am advised that there is no statutory precedent for the use of the words "to a significant extent" and that where legislation has to eliminate the insubstantial and the insignificant, in the past the word used has always been "substantially". I cannot claim to have scrutinised the entire statute book, as the right hon. Gentleman will recognise. Nevertheless, no one has been able to provide a precedent for the use of these words, and I should have thought that the usual word, "substantially"—in other words, a word that would eliminate the insubstantial, which is what it is intended to do where the detriment would be insubstantial and could be ignored—would be preferable. It is only where something is substantial that the


necessary powers should be used to prevent the availability of the services concerned.
This is an entirely reasonable amendment. The Government have considered it and rejected it on two or three occasions. Perhaps, therefore, I should not be justified in asking my right hon. and hon. Friends to go into the Division Lobby. It is a perfectly sensible amendment. The Bill would be the better for it. But perhaps we ought to allow the amendment to be negatived.

Mr. Rooker: This will be the last time that I shall intervene in the debate today. Instead of their Lordships putting into the Bill the word "substantially", it would have been better if they had put in the word "any", so that NHS patients were not disadvantaged to any extent, let alone to a significant or a substantial extent. Any diminution of the services offered to NHS patients because of private patients coming in and using NHS facilities is not on as far as the Government side of the House is concerned.
The time has long since passed when we could quibble about the word "significant". If the House of Lords wanted to revise the Bill in a proper manner for the benefit of the people of this country, it would not have put in the word "substantial" but would have used the word "any".
3.0 p.m.
I was not present in Committee because I was busy at the time trying to get the Dock Work Regulation Bill through the House. Much time was wasted on that. Perhaps I would have been better employed in discussing this Bill.
There is considerable disquiet as to the charges made for NHS facilities provided to private patients. In July the Secretary of State or his predecessor admitted that the Department of Health and Social Security had no knowledge of the fact that—

Dr. Vaughan: That is not in order.

Mr. Rooker: Is it in order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, for someone on the Conservative Front Bench to shout from a sedentary position that my remarks are not in order?

Mr. Deputy Speaker: I did not hear what was said and I should have thought

the best course would be for the hon. Gentleman to continue to make his speech to the House.

Mr. Rooker: You, Mr. Deputy Speaker, are the proper person in this Chamber to call Members to order if they become out of order.
My argument is made in the context of the Lords amendment which we are seeking to remove. It is a fact that some people who have used NHS facilities in a private capacity have not paid for the use of those facilities. Quite naturally, records are kept. My hon. Friend the Minister of State has written to me pointing out that in the last financial year £170,000 was recovered following legal action in relation to services provided under Clause 7 of the Bill—a clause which the House of Lords has sought to butcher completely by its amendments. I will name only the North-West Thames Area Health Authority. In that instance the figure was £43,000.
What is disturbing is that the regional boards actually have the power to write off debts under £500 without recourse to anyone. They do not have to get Treasury permission. I asked my right hon. Friend yesterday whether he would collect and publish the relevant information, and his reply was "No".
It is not right and proper that anybody should be able to write off debts owing by pay bed patients who have used NHS facilities and not paid their bill. I want information about the debts which have been written off to be published by region and by area. I want this information to be made public as soon as possible after the Bill gets the Royal Assent. Clearly, it will not get it today.
I invite my right hon. and hon. Friends to comment on this, bearing in mind especially all the claptrap which has been heard from Conservative Members about scroungers on the Welfare State. It turns out that those who abuse the Welfare State by using pay bed facilities—I consider it an abuse—have not paid for the use of those facilities.
We cannot go back to the consultant for the money. There is no redress to be obtained from him. He gets his fee. I am concerned with the services provided to these people by the National Health Service, and I want the information about the debts to be published. As


my right hon. Friend said in introducing the motion, the services include food, accommodation, and also blood bank facilities—even that is included—and I do not think that the debts in respect of these services should be written off. Information about those which have been written off ought to be made public, and I invite my right hon. and hon. Friends to give a commitment to publish as soon as possible the figures for which I have already asked twice.

Mr. Kilroy-Silk: I am alarmed and disturbed by the facts that my hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr (Mr. Rooker) has put before the House today. If so much money has to be collected as bad debts by the National Health Service, this is a clear case, as I assume the right hon. Member for Wanstead and Woodford (Mr. Jenkin) will agree, of people scrounging. I am a little surprised that, in all his forays and excursions into so-called abuses of the Welfare State and the scroungers in our society, he has not, prior to my hon. Friend's comments today, himself elicited this information.
These are people who clearly can afford to pay and who are not paying after they have had the benefit of facilities and services. They are parasitic on the NHS. They have been stealing from the NHS and stealing from the community as a whole. If there were no other demonstration of the iniquities of private medical practice co-existing alongside the NHS, this would be a convincing enough demonstration of the need to eradicate private medicine from the NHS.
The people of whom we are talking here have already jumped the queue by promising to grease the palm of the consultant. They have done that—he has had his money—but the hospital or the general fund has not had its money. These debts have to be collected as part of an attempt to recoup expenses incurred by the NHS at a time when it is desperately short of funds and resources and when so many essential services—kidney machines for example—are having to be curtailed or, at best, not enlarged at the rate we should like to see. It is scandalous that people who jump the queue are depriving the rest of the community—the poorest, the most needy and the sick—of much-needed and highly valued resources.
The only gleam of satisfaction which I can gain from the figures given by my hon. Friend is that the rate of collection is lowest for the Merseyside Area Health Authority. I can only assume that my constituents and those of my hon. Friends from Merseyside are honest—or perhaps efforts have not been so effective in catching them. Another reason may be that there are fewer pay beds in Merseyside than in other regions.
Reinforcing what my hon. Friend said, I should like from my right hon. Friend a clear indication not just of the amount of bad debts that have been collected but of the amounts written off. We have a right to know the amount of our money and resources which has, in effect, been given free, gratis and for nothing to private health service patients.

Mr. Pavitt: My hon. Friend may be interested to know that I have a Question down, with reference to the whole of England, Scotland and Wales, asking for details of the amounts which have been recovered by litigation and of the amounts which have been written off. I hope to have an answer in a few days.

Mr. Kilroy-Silk: I hope that my hon. Friend will be joined in his inquiries and efforts to root out these abuses by right hon. and hon. Members opposite, who show such enthusiasm—indeed, hysteria —in pursuing this kind of activity on other occasions, directing their attention to other sections, the most defenceless and vulnerable sections, of the population.
Here we have a clear case of people stealing, not just scrounging but stealing, from the NHS. What comments do hon. Gentlemen opposite have to make? I hope that the right hon. Member for Wanstead and Woodford will take the opportunity to condemn in as forthright terms as he has applied to others this group of people who are milking the National Health Service. I hope also that my right hon. Friend will give a clear commitment today that he will not tolerate this kind of activity in future, that he will make strenuous efforts to find out the total sums that have been written off, and that he will make every possible effort to recoup the money and put it back into NHS resources.

Mr. John Lee (Birmingham, Hands-worth): I rise to give more power to the


elbow of my hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr (Mr. Rooker). The House has been quite unjustifiably deprived of the inestimable services of the hon. Member for Aberdeen, South (Mr. Sproat), who, as we know, is such a strict guardian of our social services and so stern a critic of of abuses of public services and taxpayers' money.

Mr. Kilroy-Silk: Who is that?

Mr. Lee: He is the hon. Gentleman who was concerned in a certain privilege matter this week.
The clause is concerned with the protection of Health Service patients' rights when they are threatened or encroached upon by others. Much of what has been said illustrates the case that there should be no private health facilities; that we should have a full-time, wholly comprehensive National Health Service and no private medicine. There is an arguable case for that so that the two things do not jar against each other and there is no invidious competition between the two concepts.
Whatever the right hon. Member for Wanstead and Woodford (Mr. Jenkin) may think—and it may be that the word that he prefers is the more usual one that comes to the assistance of a legal draftsman in this matter—when one compares the two words and their meanings one sees that there can be little doubt that the word that their Lordships prefer, though more familiar, is the weaker one. In other words, the effect of the Lords amendment would be to diminish somewhat the protective powers provided by the clause.
I turn now to the point raised by my hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr. On 26th July I asked my right hon. Friend how many law suits had been instituted since 1974 by the West Midlands Regional Health Board to recover fees from patients who had occupied pay beds in the region, how much money was outstanding, and how much had been recovered. My right hon. Friend the Member for Plymouth, Devonport (Dr. Owen), who was then the Minister of State at the Department, said that about 200 pay bed law suits had been the subject of legal proceed-

ings, resulting in the recovery of about £13,500. That is not in itself a particularly large sum, but it is interesting to note that there is a considerable amount of activity in this connection and that in a number of instances legal action is necessary to recover money from pay bed patients. My right hon. Friend went on to show that the situation was not satisfactory. He also said:
Figures relating to current pay bed debtors are not specifically identified, but health authorities are required to pursue all outstanding debts, seeking the aid of the regional health authority's legal department as necessary."— [Official Report, 26th July 19976; Vol. 916, c. 103]

Mr. Thorne: Did the reply to my hon. Friend's Question reveal how much it costs the NHS to bring such actions and collect the money?

Mr. Lee: That information was not revealed, and, as I think my hon. Friend appreciates, it is an unsatisfactory aspect of certain kinds of civil litigation—and this may be one of them—that even when someone is successful in a law suit he does not necessarily recover all his costs. It may be that there are some totally irrecoverable debts that the taxpayer and the NHS as a whole have to bear as a result of action having been taken to recover money and winning the case but not being able to recover costs.
On the same day as I asked my Question, my hon. Friend the Member for Perry Barr asked my right hon. Friend what procedure was taken for writing off debts, and it was said that Treasury approval had to be given. It was said that such approval had been obtained for all debts in excess of a delegated limit, which was currently £500. What is the position about debts of other amounts? Who authorises action in those cases? How stringently are these matters pursued.
Earlier this year and towards the end of last year there was a lot of discussion about writing off the debts of the Clay Cross authority. Everybody knows how stringent the district auditor can be. He is an independent quasi-judicial authority and is not beholden to any Minister. He can act independently of Government Departments. The Treasury, on the other hand, is a Government Department, and we should like to know whether the criteria adopted by the Treasury are


more or less strict than those adopted by the auditor when dealing with the Clay Cross situation. Many of my hon. Friends would be grateful if the Minister would be good enough to give us that information. Since the debate has been going on for some minutes, with the assistance of his officials, perhaps the Minister will now be in a position to tell us what the total bad debt currently outstanding is and how many law suits are currently being pursued.
3.15 p.m.
It will be interesting to know whether there are certain cases where no law suits are being pursued and for what reason. There may be certain compassionate cases where it might not be wholly desirable to do so, but I would expect the Minister to say that his Department is pursuing these matters, that he expects to recover the moneys concerned and that he will not hesitate to take legal action in order to do so.
My hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr asked what the effect of indebtedness would have been on a person's right to transfer to Health Service status. The Minister replied:
Under present arrangements failure by a private patient to settle their account does not itself justify a reversion to NHS status."— [Official Report, 26th July 1976; Vol. 916, c. 101]
One would like to know how many abuses of the system a private patient has to perpetrate before he can be said to have defaulted.

Mr. Rooker: Does my hon. Friend reckon that someone in the middle of a course of treatment under the private pay bed system who cannot pay is in fact sent home because he cannot pay? Does my hon. Friend think that happens? Clearly what happens is that such a person is wheeled into an NHS ward.

Mr. Lee: Yes, and that would probably be right. I do not think anyone would want to treat a patient in any other way. It would be inhuman to do so.
What we are concerned with is that there shall be no more abuse. As the present ballyhoo continues on the subject of scroungers, we are anxious to see that there is no scrounging at the expense of the Health Service. I am sure the whole House, including hon. Members opposite who are so concerned about the need for

meticulous care in Government expenditure, will join us in being guardians of the public purse.

Question put and agreed to.

Lords Amendments Nos. 35, 36 and 37 disagreed to.

Clause 8

RESTRICTION ON POWER UNDER SECTION 31 OF 1968 ACT TO ALLOW USE OF NHS FACILITIES BY PRIVATE PATIENTS

Lords amendment: No. 38, in page 9, line 38, leave out "satisfied" and insert "advised by the Board".

Mr. Moyle: I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: With this we may take Lords Amendments No. 39 to 43.

Mr. Moyle: Clause 8 makes some limited provision for private patients to be treated by the NHS after the Bill becomes law on an occasional basis for certain scarce facilities. The group of amendments that we are now considering attempts to extend these exceptions.
Amendment No. 38 tries to remove from the Secretary of State the decision about admitting people for NHS treatment. Apart from the fact that the Secretary of State is responsible to this House for the administration of the NHS, we feel that the solution proposed—to place on the Board the duty of considering whether individual private patients shall be treated for occasional facilities by the NHS—is inappropriate in that these decisions can be made only at local level and in the knowledge of local circumstances.
The Board is not equipped in any way to have the necessary information to give meaningful advice on the sort of applications which are likely to come forward under the amendment if it were to be accepted. By requiring the advice of the Board, a national institution, on these matters, the amendment might result in delay in patients receiving facilities from the NHS, which in the case of emergencies could be unfortunate.
Amendment No. 39 seeks to extend to private patients access to NHS accommodation or services, not only if they have a need for the specialised equipment or


skills which we shall occasionally allow to be made available to them but also if the need for such facilities is likely to arise during the course of their treatment. In other words, some assessment would have to be made about the future course of treatment of such patients.
The Goodman agreement proposed that health authorities should allow private patients access to facilities at NHS hospitals if specialised treatment were not available in the private sector, and it is not envisaged in the agreement that the Government should provide facilities for private patients to undergo routine treatment purely on the hypothetical assessment that they might need specialised facilities in due course because complications might arise. That is right outside the Goodman proposals and we ask the House to reject it.
My hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr (Mr. Rooker), who has now left the Chamber, might have been interested to know it can be arranged for a private patient receiving treatment outside the NHS, if complications arise, to transfer into the NHS for that specialised treatment.
Amendment No. 40 proposes that a demand for access for private patients to NHS facilities should be based not only on the situation of the patient but also on the convenience of his practictioner. We have proposed that demand should be assessed purely on the basis of the treatment needed by the patient. We cannot see any way in which the operation of the access to NHS treatment can be extended to private patients on the basis of the convenience or inconvenience of the practitioner. I therefore ask the House to reject that amendment also.
Amendment No. 41 would require the Secretary of State to permit private patients access to NHS facilities only in accordance with arrangements which, in the opinion of the Board, are best suited to secure that all patients, private or NHS, are admitted on the same basis of medical priority. The Secretary of State has discretionary powers under Section 31 of the 1968 Act. This amendment seeks once more to remove this discretion and to transfer it to the Board. Again, it would be an erosion of my right hon. Friend's power with regard to provision in NHS hospitals.

Mr. Ennals: Monstrous.

Mr. Moyle: My right hon. Friend feels that that would be a monstrous curtailment of his powers. I agree with him, to the extent of asking the House to reject that amendment also. Again, it is not an appropriate function for the Board, which has no locus in deciding in which circumstances patients should be admitted under Clause 8. I ask the House to reject that amendment on the same grounds as I adduce for opposing Amendment No. 38.
Finally, Lords Amendment No. 43 would enable the Secretary of State, on the advice of the Board, to set aside accommodation at NHS hospitals for the exclusive use of private patients. As I have said several times today, such a proposal misconceives the purpose of the Board, which is generally to phase out private practice from the NHS. The Goodman agreement on which the Bill is founded proposed that NHS accommodation should be made available to private patients only on an occasional and specific basis for the use of specialised facilities. The amendment is totally at variance with that agreement, in that it would allow the NHS to set aside whole groups of beds for private patients. For that reason, I ask the House to reject it.

Dr. Vaughan: We support this group of amendments. If the Secretary of State regarded the previous group of amendments as a monstrous curtailment of his powers, it is interesting that his colleague the Minister of State should have spoken in a much more restrained way on this group of amendments which, if anything, we regard as even more important than the previous group.
The justification for wanting to put more discretion into the hands of the Board and less into the hands of the Minister lies in the partisan way in which the Minister responded to the remarks made by the hon. Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr (Mr. Rooker). It is characteristic that the hon. Member for Perry Barr, having delivered himself of some remarks, most of which were irrelevant to the amendment, should then leave the Chamber.
We think it important to replace "satisfied" by "advised by the Board". As the Minister said, this subject is highly complicated and specialised. The grounds on which the Secretary of State can allow


a patient to use the private facilities in National Health Service hospitals can be very complicated.
We are concerned about the patient who goes into a private medical unit suffering from a mild illness and who subsequently develops unexpected and perhaps serious complications. It is clearly in his interests to be able to be transferred quickly and easily. We are concerned about patients who need specialised deep X-ray and radiotherapy. We are concerned about heart operations, organ transplant operations and technically skilled operations of that kind. We are also concerned—this is relevant to discussions we have recently had in the Chamber—about patients admitted for general malaise who are discovered to be suffering from a serious infectious disease which needs specialised care.
On all these issues it is not enough to leave the decision in the hands of the Secretary of State. Having set up the Board, the Government should take the Board's advice. The Board's remit is to decide how the facilities should be best used in the patients' interests. We wish to see the amendments accepted.

Mr. Pavitt: I heard with interest the arguments put forward by the hon. Member for Reading, South (Dr. Vaughan). What is being ignored is the finite nature of the Board. On 23rd May next year the first 1,000 bed pay beds will have gone and the Board will be concerned with the remaining 3,500. Every six months the House will bring pressure to bear to see that the remaining beds are phased out quickly. If power is transferred temporarily from the Secretary of State to the Board, within a short time it will have to be transferred back again to the Secretary of State because, once the phasing out operation has taken place, the Board will no longer be needed.
Lords Amendment No. 39 deals with specialised facilities. A person is entitled to specialised facilities whether those facilities have previously been provided privately or otherwise, and the National Health Service covers that.
I am concerned about the abuse that might occur. I remember, for example, that when patients in private abortion clinics suffered severe haemorrhage, the

National Health Service had to provide plasma at short notice because of the inadequate service provided by the abortion clinic. The clinic made an enormous amount of money out of the plight of pregnant young girls, but when the life of the patient became endangered, the NHS would have to come to the rescue by sending a complete medical team, and plasma. I am glad that my right hon. Friend proposes to reject Lords Amendment No. 39.

Question put and agreed to.

Lords Amendments Nos. 39, 40, 41, 42 and 43 disagreed to.

Lords amendment: No. 44, in page 10, line 42, at end insert
provided that the Secretary of State shall not determine the charges for the services of any consultant

3.30 p.m.

Mr. Ennals: I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said Amendment.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: With this we may take Lords amendment No. 45.

Mr. Ennals: This amendment would deprive the National Health Service of funds which it would otherwise receive from private patients. Paragraph 3(e) of the Goodman proposals suggested that:
Charges will be made to these patients
—those are patients admitted under Clause 8—
and there would be no subsidy by the NHS.
It is quite right that there should not be a subsidy. Part-time consultants will fix and charge their own fees, as they do at present, and the NHS will not be involved in this arrangement. On the other hand, whole-time consultants are paid a salary by the NHS and it is appropriate that the NHS should include an element in the charge made to a private patient treated by a whole-time consultant to cover the costs of his services. This element would in many cases be paid into research funds as it is at present. That would be lost if the amendment were to be sustained in the Bill.

Question put and agreed to.

Lords Amendment No. 45 disagreed to.

Clause 11

INTERPRETATION OF PART II

Lords amendment: No. 46, in page 13, line 41, at end insert
'district' shall have the meaning set out in section 9(7) of the National Health Service Reorganisation Act 1973".

Mr. Moyle: I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.
The House has already rejected the proposal that the Health Services Board should have the power to authorise fresh pay beds. This amendment would have been consequential had that proposal been accepted.

Question put and agreed to.

Lords amendment: No. 47, in page 14, line 1, leave out "six" and insert "twelve".

Mr. Ennals: I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.
This amendment changed the definition of the initial period from six months to 12 months from the date on which the Act is passed. That was a further delaying tactic. I do not think that my hon. Friends would conceive of letting this go through.

Mr. Patrick Jenkin: I shall deal with this matter briefly, because we covered the point a number of times in Committee. The amendment concerns the considerable volume of work which will fall upon the Board if the initial period is to be only six months. I appreciate that there is a power of dispensation in Clause 4 in relation to that matter. But there are a number of other matters on which the Board has to present reports and to undertake work. It was said repeatedly in Committee that the six-months period was too short. That was a figure plucked out of the air for the purpose of the Goodman proposals. In another place the Minister freely acknowledged that Parliament was not necessarily bound by every detail of the Goodman proposals. Their Lordships came to the conclusion that the period ought to be 12 months and that we should proceed with a little less haste and with more deliberation on this matter. The chances

are that the decisions which will be made by the Board are more likely to be sensible and rational if the Board is not obliged to proceed over-hastily.
I believe that this is an amendment of considerable importance. I therefore invite my hon. Friends to resist the Government's motion in the Division Lobby.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: The Question is, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.
As many as are of that opinion say "Aye". [HON. MEMBERS: "Aye."] To the contrary "No." [HON. MEMBERS: "No."]
I think that the "Ayes" have it. [HON. MEMBERS: "Aye."] The "Ayes" have it.

Question put and agreed to.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: The next amendment is Lords Amendment No. 48.

Hon. Members: No.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: I put the Question a second time on Lords Amendment No. 47 and there was no indication from the Opposition that they wished to have a Division.

Clause 14

NOTICE OF NOTIFIABLE WORKS

Lords amendment: No. 48, in page 17, line 9, leave out from "means" to end of line 12 and insert:
premises which would be controlled premises but for the fact that the number of beds which they provide or will provide is smaller than that specified in section 12(2) above;

Mr. Moyle: I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.
This amendment seeks to define "hospital premises" as premises which would have been controlled premises but for the fact that they provide fewer than 100 or 75 beds, depending upon whether the facilities are in London or in the provinces.
The purpose of the notification system is to provide the Board with a body of information about the scale and nature of private sector developments to enable the Board to perform effectively its functions, one of which is to limit the size of the private sector under Part III. The Government have been consulting on a


definition which would provide the Board with the necessary and valuable information and, until that is realised, we ask the House to reject the amendment.

Mr. Patrick Jenkin: This was a point which we exposed in Committee almost as a side wind of an amendment moved by my hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Edgbaston (Mrs. Knight). This again was an amendment on which there was a tied vote in Committee and which was guillotined on Report.
As it left this House, the Bill provided that for the purposes of the notification procedure any premises used or to be used for the prevention, diagnosis or treatment of illness or the reception of patients had to be subject to the notification procedure. This would enable the Health Services Board and, through it, the Department to compile an entire Domesday Book of every conceivable sort of premise, however irrelevant for the purposes of the control of development of independent hospital premises that might be. It would include every kind of sick room and, for example, any facility for the treatment of accidents at sports grounds. My hon. Friend the Member for Edgbaston suggested that it would include even geriatric homes. All sorts of premises would be swept into the net for the purposes of the notification procedure.
This seemed to be totally unnecessary and a gross infringement. But then it turned out that it was the Government's intention to collect a comprehensive list of premises available in the private sector —[Interruption.] The Secretary of State appears to be trying to give the impression that he was not aware of that. However, that is what his hon. Friend said in Committee. He said that it was the purpose not just to complete the control provided for in Part III but to go widely beyond that and to compile an enormous dossier of every conceivable sort of premise which might be used for the treatment or diagnosis of illness or even for the prevention of illness.
This is entirely unnecessary for the purposes of the Bill. We recognise that, if we are to have a control of the kind provided for in Part III, there must be measures to make sure that the control is not being evaded and there must be some way, therefore, of notifying the authorities that a premise might come

within that control, and it is for them to decide that it is one for which a permit is needed.
Therefore, we put forward an amendment, on which my noble Friends in another place are now giving this House an opportunity to express a view, so that the only premises to which notification applied were
premises which would be controlled premises but for the fact that the number of beds which they provide or will provide is smaller than that specified in section 12(2)".
Clause 12(2) contains the definition of "controlled premises" and defines them in five specific categories—premises which are to be used for the carrying out of surgical procedures under general anaesthesia, obstetrics, radiotherapy, renal dialysis and radiology or diagnostic pathology.
The purpose of the control is to ensure a measure of surveillance over the construction of large independent hospitals providing acute medical services. According to Clause 12, only premises of that kind should be defined as hospital premises for the purposes of giving notice of notifiable works.
The amendment, which is exactly the same as that moved in this House but not debated, is sensible and will avoid the authorities being cluttered up with vast amounts of material which will require to be notified. I hope that the Government, on reflection, will accept the amendment. If they do not, I urge my hon. Friends to join me in the Division Lobby in its support.

Question put:—

The House divided: Ayes 277, Noes 257.

[For Division List No. 429 see c. 1837]

Question accordingly agreed to.

Clause 23

GENERAL INTERPRETATION, AMENDMENTS AND REPEALS

Lords amendment: No. 49, in page 24, line 20, at end insert:
(8A) Where an agriculture dwelling-house advisory committee advises that in the interests of efficient agriculture there is urgent need for the provision of suitable alternative accommodation, and the authority has been unable to provide such accommodation within three months from the date of the advice, the applicant shall have the right to use land in his


occupation as a site for a caravan for agricultural worker without any requirement for a site licence under the Caravan Sites and Control of Development Act 1960, and without planning permission, until such time as suitable alternative accommodation is provided by the local authority.

Mr. Ennals: I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: With this we may take Lords Amendment No. 68.

Mr. Ennals: Amendment No. 68 requires that the quorum of the Board be seven, including deputies, for the taking of any final decision under either Part II or Part III of the Bill. The Goodman proposals suggested that the Board should be independent. It is the Government's view that it would be inconsistent with this aim if the Board had its working arrangements fixed by statute.
The Government believe that the arrangements should properly be left to the Board itself. The Government expect that the chairman and members of the Board will be people of standing who will act responsibly in deciding upon the Board's procedure. Therefore, we reject their Lordships' suggestion that this should be written into the Bill.
Lords Amendment No. 49 removes from the Bill the Secretary of State's power to make provisions in regulations for the quorum and procedure of the Board in relation to applications for authorisations. As Secretary of State I intend to carry out the required consultations on regulations. We have not laid down what the Board's quorum should be, but we would wish to lay down for the benefit of applicants and other interested people the procedures that the Board will follow when dealing with authorisation applications.
The Government wish to provide the Board as far as possible with the independence that was proposed for it in the Goodman agreement. We believe that it would be to the detriment of applicants and other interested people if there were not regulations giving them some indication of how the Board should carry out its work. It is for that reason that the Government also reject Lords Amendment No. 49.

Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: The Secretary of State has raised a matter of constitutional importance, because paragraph (d) lays down that the quorum and the procedure should be dealt with by way of regulation. We feel that it is very much better that the House of Commons should deal with this matter and that it should not be delegated solely to the Civil Service. We know that the usual procedure when the Civil Service and the Minister deal with such matters is that they discuss the matter with certain sectional interests completely outside democratic control. As long as we have a democracy, we believe strongly that the House of Commons should deal with this matter and should write into the Bill exactly what the quorum should be.

Mr. Ennals: It is not the Minister or civil servants who will decide the quorum but the members of the Board themselves. It is perfectly proper that they, as independent people, should decide that matter. It should not be laid down for them by the House of Commons.

Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: That is even worse. Let us suppose, for the sake of argument, that there were a lazy Health Board. We might find that its members said that only one or two people should turn up. That would be the worst thing possible. In order to ensure that the Board does its job properly, it is only fair that the House of Commons should write into the Bill the nature of the quorum. The Goodman proposals regarded the balance of the Board as being of particular importance. In those circumstances it seems necessary that some view on the exact number of the quorum should be stated.
The right hon. Gentleman mentioned that the number of seven was voted on earlier on the first Lords amendment. None the less, I understand that it is perfectly competent to raise this matter again. I hope that it will be reconsidered by the Government. It would be to the satisfaction of those who work on the Board, whoever they may be, for the nature of the quorum to be laid down. If that were done, the Board members would feel obliged to attend and to do their job properly.

Question put and agreed to.

Lords amendment: No. 50, in page 19, line 26, leave out "including" and insert "excluding".

Mr. Moyle: I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.

Mr. Speaker: With this we are to take Lords Amendment No. 51.

4.0 p.m.

Mr. Moyle: The amendment seeks to exclude from the regulation-making powers of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State a power to make regulations allowing inspectors to enter premises for the purposes of considering authorisations under Part III of the Bill. I know that this is a sensitive issue and that the House would not wish the Government lightly to propose that inspectors should enter premises unless there were a real need for them so to do. We would not wish to include this power unless it were absolutely essential.
We have considered the matter and have come to the conclusion that the conduct of an inspection under Part III for the purposes of authorisation is essential since a proper assessment of premises in many cases cannot be made except from inside those premises—for example, of the standards of operating theatres, the numbers of beds, and matters of that sort.
I am sure that the House will agree that in these circumstances, therefore, entry for inspection is absolutely essential. I ask the House to reject the amendment.

Mr. Boscawen: There was a lot of discussion on this matter in Committee, where the voting was tied, but the House was not given the opportunity to debate it when the Bill came back on Report.
We regard this as a very important matter. Here once again is the sort of statutory requirement of all left-wing Socialist Bills of today—the break and entry clause. We have yet another group of inspectors being given power to come and snoop into the efforts of the private sector to produce alternative accommodation for health care.
As we said many times in Committee, we dislike this sort of thing. If the clause goes through, there will be four sets of inspectors from different bodies under different legislation empowered to

inspect what is going on in a hospital or nursing home.
We object to this because of the amount of time that it wastes and the amount of money it costs. It would appear that the private sector cannot be trusted by the Government to carry out the regulations outlined in the Bill. It is not good enough to create even more inspectors and bureaucrats to see what is being done in the private sector.
I hope that my hon. Friends will feel that it is necessary to vote for the amendment. The second amendment is purely consequential on the first.

Question put:—

The House divided: Ayes 279, Noes 254.

[For Division List No. 430 see c. 1841]

Question accordingly agreed to.

Lords Amendment No. 51 disagreed to.

Clause 17

APPEALS

Lords amendment: No. 52, in page 20, line 5, leave out "this section" and insert "the preceding subsection".

4.15 p.m.

Mr. Ennals: I beg to move, That this House doth agree with the Lords in the said amendment.

Mr. Speaker: With this we may take Lords Amendments Nos. 53 to 56.

Mr. Ennals: The Bill as it left the House contained provisions for appeal on a point of law to be made to the High Court in England and Wales, or the Court of Session in Scotland, and that the decision of the court on an appeal was to be final. The provisions of Clause 17 were extensively debated in Standing Committee D, in this House and in another place. The Government have given thought to the points raised then, and in another place, and as a result have decided to table a group of amendments to add provisions for a further channel of appeal. These amendments were agreed to in another place and appear on the Amendment Paper as Nos. 52, 53, 54, 55 and 56.
The effect of the amendments taken together is to make provision, on the


pattern which is normally adopted under the Tribunals and Inquiries Act 1971, in cases where an appeal lies on a point of law from an inferior tribunal. This means that there might be an appeal as of right to a High Court in England and Wales. A further appeal would lie, with leave, to the Court of Appeal and thence, with leave, to the House of Lords. In Scotland an appeal will lie from the Court of Session with leave directly to the House of Lords.
The Government think it right that this provision for further appeal should be put into the Bill. It was powerfully argued by hon. Members in the Committee. Nevertheless, we naturally hope that the provision for further appeals will be little used. We are advised that points of law are not likely to arise in the context of the Board's decisions. We hope that one appeal will be sufficient to obtain an authoritative decision on any appeal which might arise.
I hope that the decision of the Government, to consider the points which were well argued in Committee, will be accepted and welcomed by the House.

Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: We welcome the Government's acceptance of this amendment. The Secretary of State said in Committee that he was concerned about fairness and natural justice and that he would report to the House on this matter before the Report stage. We are grateful for these Lords amendments. It is right that someone should know the case brought against him and have the opportunity to answer it, and in particular that he should be able to answer back in return once the arguments have been put against him and heard.

Mr. Crowder: The Secretary of State said, "We were advised that there was little likelihood of any appeals taking place." Who gave that advice?

Mr. Ennals: It was simply legal advice, that it seemed unlikely that the new facility for appeal would be extensively used, but it can be used of course. I was in no way seeking to undermine the right of appeal or the additional rights of appeal which have been written into the Bill.

Mr. Crowder: With great respect, the Minister has not answered the question. Who gave that advice?

Mr. Ennals: It is not appropriate on the Floor of the House for me to indicate which of my advisers gave me what advice.

Question put and agreed to.

Mr. Speaker: By leave of the House, and only by leave, I will put the consequential Lords amendments together.

Lords Amendments Nos. 53 to 56 agreed to.

Clause 18

OFFENCES

Lords amendment: No. 57, in page 20, line 41, leave out "and (2)".

Mr. Moyle: I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.
This amendment appears to justify the thesis of my hon. Friend the Member for Brent, South (Mr. Pavitt) that the House of Lords is not a suitable revising Chamber and that it makes a dog's dinner of much legislation.
Clause 14 provides that any applicant for planning permission for any notifiable works under the Bill must notify the Board of the proposed application by giving a notice in the prescribed form. Their Lordships did not disagree with that proposition. However, by this amendment, what they then proposed to do was remove from the Bill the necessity for the provision of the sort of information which the Board would require in order to consider the notification properly.
Although retaining the desire for notice in the prescribed form, their Lordships would also want us to remove the sanction which would be applied if the appropriate notice were not made. In the circumstances, I advise the House to reject the amendment.

Mrs. Lynda Chalker: I am at a loss to understand the Minister's argument. It appears that the Government have had a sudden change of heart. I looked up what was said in another place on the third day of the Committee stage and found that when the noble Baroness, Baroness Young moved the amendment which the Government now seek to reject, not one word was said on the Government side. I do not know


about the other place having a dog's dinner: there was no dinner at all on this amendment.
The reason for the amendment was the question of the penalty. No one seeks to omit the detail from the scrutiny of the Board, but surely the penalty is quite inappropriate when the notice must have been served. If the notice has been served properly, as provided by other clauses, it is the question of the penalty applying to provision of the detail which concerns us.
If there is to be a question of subsequent planning detail the lawyers would have a dog's dinner in deciding which of the planning procedures prescribed would be covered by the penalty clause, Clause 18, as it relates to Clause 14(1) and (2). It would be a mess to throw out a sensible amendment from another place.

Question put and agreed to.

Clause 24

CITATION, COMMENCEMENT AND EXTENT

Lords amendment: No. 58, in page 24, line 42, leave out "two" and insert "twelve".

Mr. Moyle: I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.
The issue here is fairly straightforward. As the Bill left this House, Part III, setting out the procedure for authorising private facilities outside the NHS, was to be brought in two months after the Bill received the Royal Assent.
Their Lordships passed an amendment which provides that Part III shall come into operation 12 months after the Royal Assent to the Bill has been received. I find that difficult to understand from their point of view because it would mean that no authorisations under Part III could be given at least until well into 1977.
For those reasons, and in the confidence that the Government can carry out the necessary consultations within a two-month period after the Royal Assent, I urge the House to reject the amendments and replace the old starting date of two months after the date of the Royal Assent.

Mr. Boscawen: There is little likelihood that the Government can get the Board going and get Part III into operation within two months. The Board has

an enormous job to do. Its first priority is to sort out the waiting list problem. We do not see two months as a practical possibility. We believe that it will take far longer to get the Board appointed and for the Board to settle down and find out what its job is. It will have to phase out the remaining pay beds after the first 1,000 before it gets on to Part II to investigate the aspirations of the private sector. We think that 12 months is a much more practicable and reasonable period.

Question put and agreed to.

Schedule 1

THE HEALTH SERVICES BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES

Lords Amendments Nos. 59 to 61 disagreed to.

Lords amendment: No. 62, in page 27. line 26, leave out
or deputy member" and insert "and deputy members".

Mr. Ennals: I beg to move, That this House doth disagree with the Lords in the said amendment.

Mr. Speaker: With this we are taking Lords Amendment No. 63, plus the Government amendment in lieu thereof, Lords Amendments Nos. 64 and 65, plus the Government amendment in lieu thereof, and Lords Amendments Nos. 66 and 67, plus the Government amendment in lieu thereof.

Mr. Ennals: Their Lordships carried a group of six amendments, Nos. 62 to 67 to paragraph 10 of Schedule 1. Taken together, their effect is to require more than one deputy to be appointed for each member of the Board and each member of the Scottish and Welsh Committees.
The Government believe that there was some doubt in the minds of their Lordships about whether the Bill as sent to the Lords already provided for one deputy to be appointed for each member. We consider it possible that, mistakenly, their Lordships thought that the amendment they carried achieved what they had in mind. That is a good definition of a dog's breakfast. Their Lordships thought that thereby they were correcting a deficiency in the Bill.
It is not clear whether their Lordships intended more than one deputy to be


appointed, so we thought it better to get the record straight. To remove all doubt, the Government wish to move certain amendments to the Lords amendments in this group to restore the effect of paragraph 10 of Schedule 1 to what it was before it left the House of Commons. There is to be one deputy each for the chairmen of the Board and the two committees and one deputy for each member of the Board and of the committees.

Mr. Patrick Jenkin: I should again like to thank the Secretary of State for having met the case put to him both in Committee and in another place. We seem to have a sensible arrangement now for the deputies both on the Board and on the Scottish and Welsh Committees.
As this is the last amendment which is grouped, though not the last to be called, perhaps I may say that I am delighted that on both sides of the House the plea that I made at the beginning of the proceedings has been so effectively harkened to, and that we shall have succeeded in reaching decisions on all the matters returned to us from another place.
I realise the strain that must have been imposed on the hon. Members for Preston, South (Mr. Thorne), Barking (Miss Richardson) and Lichfield and Tamworth (Mr. Grocott) who all took such a leading part in our proceedings on earlier stages of the Bill. I am appreciative that they should have remained wholly silent during the proceedings today and allowed us to make progress so that we shall be able to finish the Bill within the time set for us by the guillotine.
The right hon. Member for Blackburn (Mrs. Castle) and the hon. Member for Wolverhampton, North-East (Mrs. Short) spoke only once. That shows that we can make progress and reach a decision on the Bill provided that hon. Members on both sides of the House contain themselves. That has been wholly desirable. We have done fairly by interests outside the House and by another place. Although we have disagreed profoundly with many of the decisions taken by the House of Commons and voted no fewer than nine times today, we can honestly say that we have done our duty.

4.30 p.m.

Mr. Ennals: I, too, should like to thank my hon. Friends. Friday is not a good time—many hon. Members on both sides have had to forgo other engagements—but we have had a large attendance. We have had not only many votes, but substantial majorities throughout. It is a great advantage to be able to show the strength of feeling that exists in the House so that their Lordships may recognise that on major and contentious issues there have been substantial votes.

Question put and agreed to.

Lords amendment disagreed to: No. 63, in page 27, line 27, leave out "a" and insert "any".

Amendment made to the Bill in lieu thereof: page 27, line 26, leave out paragraph (a) and insert—
'(a) a deputy chairman to act in place of the chairman of the Board and, for each other member of the Board, a deputy member to act in his place; '.—[Mr. Ennals.]

Lords Amendment No. 64 disagreed to.

Lords amendment disagreed to: No. 65, in page 27, line 29, leave out "a" and insert "any".

Amendment made to the Bill in lieu thereof: In page 27, line 28, leave out paragraph (b) and insert—
'(b) a deputy chairman to act in place of the chairman of the Scottish Committee and, for each other member of that Committee, a deputy member to act in his place; —[Mr. Ennals.]

Lords Amendment No. 66 disagreed to.

Lords amendment disagreed to: No. 67, in page 27, line 32, leave out "a" and insert "any".

Amendment made to the Bill in lieu thereof: In page 27, line 31, leave out paragraph (c) and insert—
'(c) a deputy chairman to act in place of the chairman of the Welsh Committee and, for each other member of that Committee, a deputy member to act in his place.'.—[Mr. Ennals.]

Lords Amendments Nos. 68 and 69 disagreed to.

Mr. Speaker: I must inform the House that I have had notice of a manuscript amendment to be moved to the next motion to appoint Mr. Enoch Powell to


the Reasons Committee. When we come to the appropriate stage in this motion, I shall put the amendment.

Motion made, and Question,
That a Committee be appointed to draw up Reasons to be assigned to the Lords for disagreeing to certain of their amendments.—[Mr. Ennals.]

put forthwith pursuant to the Order [10th November] and agreed to.

Motion made, and Question proposed,
That Mr. Ennals, Mr. Patrick Jenkin, Mr. Moyle, Mr. Pendry, Dr. Vaughan be Members of the Committee.—[Mr. Ennals.]

Mr. Speaker: The amendment is, at the end add the name "Mr. Enoch Powell". I apologise. The right hon. Member for Down, South (Mr. Powell) is to move the amendment, "That the name of 'Dr. Vaughan' be added."

Mr. J. Enoch Powell: I beg to move an amendment to insert, after the name of Dr. Vaughan, the name of Mr. Dunlop. [Laughter.]

Mr. Speaker: Order. It has been a busy week!

Question put forthwith, pursuant to the Order [10th November], That the amendment he made:—

The House divided: Ayes 257, Noes 273.

[For Division List No. 431, see c. 1845]

Question accordingly negatived.

Main Question put forthwith, pursuant to the Order [10th November], and agreed to.

Motion made, and Question,
That three be the quorum.—[Mr. Ennals.]

put forthwith, pursuant to the Order [10th November], and agreed to.

Motion made, and Question,
That the Committee do withdraw immediately.—[Mr. Ennals.]

put forthwith, pursuant to the Order [10th November], and agreed to.

Orders of the Day — EDUCATION BILL

[ALLOTTED DAY]

Lords amendment in lieu of one of their amendments disagreed to by the Commons, considered.

Clause 2

SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS FOR GIVING EFFECT TO COMPREHENSIVE PRINCIPLE

The Lords do not insist on their amendment in page 2, line 38, to which the Commons have disagreed, but propose the following amendment in lieu thereof:

No. 1, in page 2, line 35, leave out from "unsatisfactory" to end of line 38 and insert:
and any such requirement—

(a) shall be accompanied by a statement of the matters in relation to which the previous proposals are in his opinion unsatisfactory and of the reasons for his opinion and
(b) may specify conditions to be fulfilled by the further proposals with respect to any of those matters."

4.48 p.m.

The Secretary of State for Education and Science and Paymaster General (Mrs. Shirley Williams): I beg to move. That this House doth agree with the Lords in the said amendment in lieu.
I am pleased to see such numbers on the Opposition Front Bench.
We are glad that their Lordships have accepted the reasons this House gave for disagreeing with their amendments and are not involving us in protracted consideration at this stage of a measure which has enjoyed comfortable majorities at all stages. The Bill now before us is substantially the same as the one we sent to their Lordships on 22nd July. We have accepted the deletion of a clause on the responsibility of married 16-year-olds to receive full-time instruction and added one which amends the Education Act 1944 in respect of pupils' special educational treatment.
We propose that one further amendment be made. Last night my noble Friend Lord Donaldson of Kingsbridge moved an amendment which incorporates the substance of the last few lines of


Clause 2(4) of the Bill we sent to the other place and which their Lordships deleted, and the Liberal amendment which tried to remedy some of the damage caused by that deletion by providing that the Secretary of State give reasons for finding proposals submitted to her unsatisfactory. Their Lordships accepted this amendment, which has the effect of requiring me to give reasons when I reject a proposal for comprehensive reorganisation. However, it would also enable me to specify conditions that any further proposals would have to fulfil in respect of any matters that I found unacceptable in the original proposal.

Mr. Christopher Price: I know that everyone is anxious to go home but I do not think it would be right to pass the amendment on the nod. I wish to ask my right hon. Friend one or two questions about the amendment that the Government moved in another place.
As my right hon. Friend said, the amendment uses different language from that which was originally in the Bill to state the way in which the Secretary of State can, as it were, deal with phoney comprehensive schemes. It is right that the House, especially my right hon. and hon. Friends, should be concerned about my right hon. Friend's powers to deal with phoney comprehensive schemes because it is quite certain that some of the remaining local education authorities that have not gone comprehensive will use, instigated by the hon. Member for Chelmsford (Mr. St. John-Stevas), all sorts of stratagems to delay the day when they finally go comprehensive. This is made more serious since the House of Lords decision on Tameside, which I shall not characterise with the epithets that I used on an earlier occasion.

Mr. Mike Noble: Why not?

Mr. Price: I could use some epithets, but whatever one may say about that decision its effect will be to make some local education authorities even more dilatory, egged on and spurred on as before by the irresponsible individuals in charge of education matters on the Conservative Front Bench. I see that the hon. Member for Chelmsford has been

joined in harness with the hon. Member for Brent, North (Dr. Boyson)—a fine pair they will make. There is a real danger that that pair who do not have the job of the local administration of education, may egg on Tory education authorities into litigation that could provide even further delays.
I hope I shall receive an absolute assurance from my right hon. Friend that the new wording, which has no doubt been drawn up by the expert lawyers in the Department of Education and Science, in whom we all have such confidence, gives her exactly the same powers as she had under the original Bill, will Hot inhibit her in any way from using her powers in respect of local education authorities who use the Bill to delay going comprehensive, and will not make her talks more difficult. If she can give those assurances, my right hon. and hon. Friends and I will be happy to go along with the amendment.

Mr. Norman St. John-Stevas: This is a minor amendment and we have had a minor speech from the Secretary of State. I am sorry that it has prevented her from going to the Cambridge Union tonight, where I had hoped to debate with her at somewhat greater length. I hope, even at this late stage, that she will change her mind and that we can depart for that purpose.
However, this is not an amendment of great substance or importance. Amendments of substance and importance were debated earlier in this House. This will hardly make a change, other than a drafting change, to the Bill. We do not, therefore, propose to divide the House against it. Unless the right hon. Lady is about to make a long speech, we can go home. However, as soon as the opportunity presents itself, we intend to repeal the Bill, with the amendment that the right hon. Lady has proposed.

Mrs. Shirley Williams: By your leave, Mr. Speaker, I should like to respond to the point made by my hon. Friend the Member for Lewisham, West (Mr. Price).
I understand the reasons for being concerned about the amendment. Certainly, there have been worries about anything which would delay the intention of this House that we should reorganise schools in local authorities. However, the effect


of the amendment is simply to allow me to give detailed responses and recommendations about how an authority might satisfy the requirement to become reorganised in fully comprehensive schools. I would not have accepted the amendment if I believed that that situation would be weakened. Therefore, I am pleased to give my hon. Friend that assurance.

Question put and agreed to.

Orders of the Day — STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS

Mr. Speaker: In order to save the time of the House, I shall, with permission, put the Questions on items Nos. 3, 4 and 5 on the Order Paper together.

Motion made, and Question put forth with pursuant to Standing Order No. 73A (Standing Committee on Statutory Instruments &amp;c.),

AGRICULTURE

That the Farm Structure (Payments to Out-goers) Scheme 1976, a draft of which was laid before this House on 2nd November, be approved.

AGRICULTURE

That the Farm Amalgamations (Variation) Scheme 1976, a draft of which was laid before this House on 2nd November, be approved.

FUGITIVE CRIMINAL

That the Fugitive Offenders (United Kingdom Dependencies) (Amendment) Order 1976, a draft of which was laid before this House on 4th November, be approved.—[Mr. Bates.]

Question agreed to.

Orders of the Day — EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (MEMBERSHIP)

Ordered,
That Mr. Michael Stewart be discharged from membership of the European Parliament and that Mr. Frank Tomney be designated a member of the European Parliament:

Ordered,
That this Order be a Standing Order of the House.—[Mr. Walter Harrison.]

Orders of the Day — BONE MARROW (TRANSPLANTATION)

Motion made, and Question proposed,

That this House do now adjourn.—[Mr. Bates.]

4.56 p.m.

Mr. Keith Speed: The subject that I have the privilege of raising in Parliament today is literally a matter of life and death. A young constituent of mine, Anthony Nolan, is looking forward to his fifth birthday next month. It is quite possible that he will not live to see it, and his chances of celebrating his sixth, seventh or eighth birthdays are slim.
Anthony was born with a bone marrow disease. He is being kept alive by drugs and by the devotion, care and hard work of his mother, Mrs. Shirley Nolan, who is also a constituent of mine. Anthony has no resistance to infection. A common cold could, indeed, kill him. He has to live at home, in almost total isolation, without young friends or companions and without seeing the outside world. As a parent of young children myself, I can fully appreciate the strain imposed on his mother in literally keeping her son alive.
Alas, Anthony is not the only child with this disease. I have been given estimates of between 200 and 300 children per year who are in a similar situation in this country alone, and there are probably as many children and adults suffering from aplastic anaemia who need treatment to enable them to live.
The treatment for all these people is a bone marrow transplantation from a healthy person into the bloodstream of a patient. This life-saving operation has been pioneered by Westminster Hospital. I pay a full and deserved tribute to the team that has developed it. Already as a result of this work young people such as Simon Bostic are cured and leading a normal healthy life. Simon was lucky that his tissue was an early one which was identical in a donor.
Before the transplant can take place, volunteer bone marrow donors have to be screened so that a suitable compatible donor can be found. If the bone marrow is not entirely compatible, it will be rejected and, therefore, valueless. Indeed,


in certain circumstances unsuitable grafted marrow could attack the patient and make matters very much worse.
The problem, therefore, is to build up a master register or library of tissues, with their donors, which can be precisely matched with the patient. Unfortunately, there are about 50,000 different tissue-type combinations, and it is a mammoth task to build up the register.
When Mrs. Nolan, Anthony's mother, several years ago discovered that there was no money available to continue to tissue-type volunteer donors to try to help her son, and others like him, she set to work to establish a trust fund to finance a laboratory to carry on the work of tissue-typing which had been taking place at Westminster Hospital.
Mrs. Nolan's hard work and dedication have led to the Anthony Nolan Bone Marrow Appeal Registered Trust being set up. It is an entirely voluntary effort and, with the traditional generosity of the British public, the trust is raising the £36,000 a year needed to finance the laboratory which is testing and typing more than 100 people a week. As far as I know, this laboratory and register being built up are the only ones of their kind in existence, and the only ones that can try to match suitable donors for those hospitals with patients for whom a bone marrow transplant is urgent, vital, and often the only hope of recovery.
Elsewhere, and particularly abroad, the arrangements are that blood donors are tissue-typed and then, if they are found suitable for a patient needing a transplant, they are asked to donate bone marrow. The volunteers under the Nolan laboratory here in this country know from the start that they are being asked to join a bone marrow panel.
This privately financed work has a direct spin-off into the National Health Service, and various hospitals—including particularly Westminster Hospital—have been getting successes as a result of the work done on tissue-typing so far. In addition—I do not want to over-stress this—I understand, having spoken to medical consultants, that there is a possibility that this work could well be of vital help in the treatment of leukaemia. I understand that the Department of Health will eventually have a testing ser-

vice in blood transfusion centres, but there are no plans for supporting hospital laboratories of the type now being run by the trust—and time is now of the essence.
My first question to the Minister is whether he will explain the lack of involvement of the NHS in this vital lifesaving work. In letters to the general public, the Department has stated that the search to build up the register is being carried out as strenuously as possible, but, frankly, this is not so at the moment, and many people find it difficult to understand why the Health Service in this country has not been involved in this kind of work.
My second point is that the laboratories are now established in St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington. I appreciate the help that the area health authority and others have given to get this accommodation. I understand that the rooms being used were not used before, and therefore there is now a more efficient utilisation of resources. I should like the Minister to confirm that his Department will do nothing to upset this arrangement and, indeed, will wish to encourage it in every way possible.
However, the total cost of all the equipment, including the microscope, is about £110,000. It is vitally needed now. I fully appreciate the public expenditure contraints on the Minister, and I know that if I ask for the National Health Service to buy the equipment I shall get "No" for an answer. I am, therefore, being realistic, and have so advised the trustees.
My proposal is that the money should be lent to the trust on a properly drawn up legal agreement. The trust would even be prepared to pay a commercial rate of interest if the Department insisted on it. The trustees believe—and I think they are right—that the debt could be cleared off very quickly because they are already having to find £36,000, that is, £3,000 a month, to finance the present slower rate of work.
I feel that the public would rally round to clear this debt in record time, becauses their response has already been remarkable and it is not often that the ordinary citizen can make a contribution, no matter how modest, which can directly save


children's lives. The National Health Service would benefit fully from all this, and, internationally too, we could help patients abroad.
This is a terribly emotive subject. I have not wished to over-dramatise the position. I know of the many National Health Service priorities which face the Minister and his colleagues, but I cannot believe that there is any which, for such a relatively modest outlay, would save so many young lives. I hope that red tape and bureaucracy will not cloud the issue. I am not concerned about whether my proposal is precedented. I am concerned about saving life and preventing distress and anguish.
I hope that the Minister can respond in a positive way, so that all the hard work which Mrs. Nolan, the trustees, the Westminster Hospital and the thousands of volunteers throughout the country have already done will be the foundation for urgent and effective action to solve as soon as possible the problem of tissue-typing. This will enable Anthony Nolan and many others to be cured and to have a happy normal life.

5.7 p.m.

The Under-Secretary of State for Health and Social Security (Mr. Eric Deakins): I am sure that the House will be grateful to the hon. Member for Ashford (Mr. Speed), first, for raising this matter, and, second, for the way in which he has done so. As he said, it is an emotive subject. I can well understand the anxiety which Anthony Nolan's illness has aroused, and I know that the hon. Member's concern for a successful outcome is shared by everyone acquainted with the situation. Cases such as Anthony Nolan's are particularly distressing, and it is not difficult to imagine the strain on all the people closely involved.
I think it important that in considering the issues raised by this case we are all fully informed of the state of development of bone marrow transplantation, not only in this country but throughout the world. The case of Anthony Nolan has generated a large amount of publicity in the newspapers and on radio and television. Unfortunately, the reports of the media are usually too brief for some of the major difficulties facing us to be fully and properly explained. Inevitably, most people have been left with the rather

misleading impression that, if only the Government would make a bit more money available, many of these unfortunate children could soon be restored to a normal life. Unfortunately, this is not the case. I wish that it were, for then at least the answer to the problem would be clear, even though it might not be immediately attainable.
There are a number of severe diseases of the blood and of the blood-producing tissues—some fortunately very rare—which have in certain selected cases been successfully treated by bone marrow transplantation. The most common disease in this category is aplastic anaemia, and also included is the severe bone marrow disorder which affects Anthony Nolan. A child born with this disease forms defective platelets and lymphocytes and, because of this, the body's normal immune reactions do not develop normally and thus the child cannot fight the many infections which we all meet from infancy. There is also a further group of blood diseases which may in the future become amenable to treatment by bone marrow transplantation.
Bone marrow transplantation offers a number of advantages. First, the donation itself is a fairly minor procedure with the withdrawal of bone marrow through needles inserted usually into the pelvic bones. To avoid pain, a general anaesthetic is normally given and is the only risk involved apart from the rare possibility of infection. The donor rapidly expands his residual bone marrow to replace the small amount taken for transplantation.
Second, the necessary matching of donor and recipient can be undertaken under "cold" conditions. There need be no special haste, as with the procedures now available patients suffering from the diseases in question and awaiting a transplant can be supported for some considerable time.
Third, if one graft of bone marrow is unsuccessful, provided that it does not actually attack the recipient, another might easily be tried. The giving of the graft is a simple intravenous infusion, and new research might improve existing methods of making room in the patient's own bone marrow for the graft.
Fourth, a successful bone marrow transplant should result in the production of normal blood cells for the rest of the recipient's natural life.
Given then the apparent relative simplicity of the procedure and the diseases which might be treated, why do we not take steps to see that all patients—many of them children—who might benefit from bone marrow transplantation are given the opportunity to receive this treatment? Why do we not establish a national panel of donors? The answer to this lies in a point which the hon. Gentleman made—the extreme complexity of the problem of tissue-typing. We all know that there are a number of different blood groups—some common, others rare—and that when somebody has to receive a blood transfusion, the blood to be transfused has to be of an appropriate group. Tissue-typing, affecting transplantation of organs and tissues such as kidneys and bone marrow, is a bit like blood grouping but it is very much more complicated as many more factors between donor and recipient are involved.
Tissue-typing is still developing and research continues to provide new knowledge. However, at the present time, the combination of the exact degree of matching required by bone marrow transplantation and existing knowledge of tissue-types means that the prospect of a successful bone marrow transplant can normally be looked for only where the bone marrow to be transplanted can be obtained from a compatible close relative of the patient. To reinforce this, I would point out that the number of documented successful bone marrow transplants using marrow from an unrelated donor in the whole world is in single figures and, according to how strictly a success is defined, may be as low as one.
It is against this background that we have had to consider the desirability of developing a national panel of tissue-typed volunteers who might subsequently be called upon to donate bone marrow. Naturally, as tissue-typing a large number of volunteers costs money, we have also had to give due weight to the financial consequences of diverting resources to this procedure, which, as I have explained, must for the time being at least be regarded as wholly experimental when an unrelated donor is involved. It is, of

course, only when a compatible related donor cannot be used that a volunteer panel donor might be called on.
There are other resource implications. A person's tissue type is established by testing a sample of their blood against sera obtained from special donors, usually postpartum mothers. These sera are in very limited supply and all the possible demands for them cannot be met. At the moment the first priority for the use of these sera is kidney transplantation programme. I am sure I have no need to remind the House that kidney transplantation is an established life-giving procedure and one which I and many hon. Members wish to see develop and be provided on a wider scale.
For all these reasons, we therefore decided that the establishment of a national panel of volunteer donors could not at present be justified. This was not a decision that was taken lightly. It was taken only after consultation with the country's leading experts on all aspects of bone marrow transplantation. Nor does this mean that work on tissue-typing of potential donors must cease. Many regional blood transfusion centres undertake an appreciable amount of tissue typing of their volunteer donors in connection with other procedures, for example, transfusion of blood platelets, and they will continue to do so and perhaps expand these activities but within existing resources. All the information so obtained will be stored and if at a later date a national panel of volunteer bone marrow donors seems to be indicated it would possibly form the basis of the panel. I should point out that the directors of regional blood transfusion centres who have such files of information have already searched them to see of a donor might be found to help Anthony Nolan—but sadly, without success.
The hon. Member was good enough to give me prior notice of two points that he particularly wished to raise. On the first point—the continued availability of physical facilities for the laboratory at St. Mary Abbott's Hospital—I cannot, of course, give an indefinite guarantee. But I can say that I am aware of no current proposals to turn the tissue-typing laboratory out of its present home, and I am sure that the health authority will in the future continue to give sympathetic


consideration to the laboratory's accommodation needs. Should any move need to be contemplated at a later date there would, of course, be full consultation with the charity which funds the laboratory.
The second point concerns the possibility of the Department making a loan to Mrs. Nolan's charity for the purchase of an automated tissue-typing system. It would be open to the charity to apply to the Department for a loan, although I am not aware that similar loans have ever previously been agreed for other charities and we would be obliged to charge appropriate commercial interest rates. Thus there would be no particular advantage over a loan from more usual sources.
But even if we did make such a loan and the tissue-typing was automated, it does not follow that lives would be saved. I have previously tried to explain that the fundamental problem in this case is the current state of knowledge which means that bone marrow transplantation using an unrelated donor cannot be regarded as other than a wholly experimental procedure as yet not backed by demonstrable success. This fundamental problem and that of the availability of good quality typing sera remains whether the tissue-typing is automated, itself an unproven method, or done by conventional means. Much as I sympathise with Anthony Nolan I could not, in honesty, therefore, encourage an application for a loan.
I have already mentioned that bone marrow transplantation can prove a valuable treatment. However, at the moment the benefits are essentially restricted to patients for whom there can be found a compatible donor among their relatives. We must look to research to improve the chances of successful treatment, both for those patients who have suitable relatives, and also for those like Anthony Nolan who do not and who must rely on a breakthrough being achieved in the field of unrelated donors.
The hon. Gentleman will be aware that the Westminster Hospital, which treats Anthony Nolan, is one of the hospitals to the forefront of the development of bone marrow transplantation in this country. The hon. Gentleman has also spoken of the charitable support that this work has received. He will wish to know that my Department has received an application for a research grant from Dr. Hugh-Jones of the Westminster Children's Hospital—the proposed project being the evaluation of gnotobiotic isolation and bone marrow transplantation in children. As with most research project applications, this has been sent for the opinion of expert referees, whose advice is now awaited.
I think that I should not finish without paying tribute to those who give charitable support to the National Health Service generally, and to work on bone marrow transplantation specifically. It is sometimes suggested that the National Health Service should be so comprehensive in its provision that there is no need for support from charitable sources. Naturally we all look forward to the day when the NHS can meet all the demands made on it. That day is not yet with us, and even when and if it does arrive I hope that it will not be to the exclusion of the charitable efforts which have been a valuable source of support to the health services since long before the inception of the National Health Service.
I am genuinely sorry that I cannot offer an easy answer to the problems raised by the hon. Gentleman this afternoon. It is not because I choose not to do so, but because there is no easy answer. In conclusion, may I add that I hope that the Westminster Hospital's search for a suitable bone marrow donor for Anthony Nolan is eventually successful and that he may join the very few for whom this procedure has so far been successful using an unrelated donor.

Question put and agreed to.

Adjourned accordingly at nineteen minutes past Five o'clock.

Orders of the Day — HEALTH SERVICES BILL

Division List No. 422 [See c. 1724]


Division No. 422.]
AYES
[11.28 a.m.


Abse, Leo
Ewing, Harry (Stirling)
McNamara, Kevin


Allaun, Frank
Faulds, Andrew
Madden, Max


Anderson, Donald
Fernyhough, Rt Hon E.
Mahon, Simon


Archer, Peter
Fitch, Alan (Wigan)
Mallalieu, J. P. W.


Armstrong, Ernest
Flannery, Martin
Marks, Kenneth


Ashley, Jack
Foot, Rt Hon Michael
Marquand, David


Ashton, Joe
Ford, Ben
Marshall, Dr Edmund (Goole)


Atkins, Ronald (Preston N)
Forrester, John
Marshall, Jim (Leicester S)


Atkinson, Norman
Fowler, Gerald (The Wrekin)
Maynard, Miss Joan


Bagler, Gordon A. T.
Fraser, John (Lambeth, N'w'd)
Meacher, Michael


Bain, Mrs Margaret
Freeson, Reginald
Mellish, Rt Hon Robert


Barnett, Guy (Greenwich)
Garrett, John (Norwich S)
Mikardo, Ian


Barnett, Rt Hon Joel (Heywood)
Garrett, W. E. (Wallsend)
Millan, Rt Hon Bruce


Bates, Alf
George, Bruce
Miller, Dr M. S. (E Kilbride)


Bidwell, Sydney
Gilbert, Dr John
Miller, Mrs Millie (Ilford N)


Bishop, E. S.
Ginsburg, David
Morris, Alfred (Wythenshawe)


Blenkinsop, Arthur
Golding, John
Morris, Charles R. (Openshaw)


Boardman, H.
Gould, Bryan
Morris, Rt Hon J. (Aberavon)


Booth, RI Hon Albert
Gourlay, Harry
Moyle, Roland


Bottomley, Rt Hon Arthur
Graham, Ted
Mulley, Rt Hon Frederick


Boyden, James (Bish Auck)
Grant, George (Morpeth)
Newens, Stanley


Bradley, Tom
Grant, John (Islington C)
Noble, Mike


Bray, Dr Jeremy
Grocott, Bruce
Oakes, Gordon


Brown, Hugh D. (Proven)
Hardy, Peter
Ogden, Eric


Brown, Robert C. (Newcastle W)
Harrison, Walter (Wakefield)
O'Halloran, Michael


Brown, Ronald (Hackney S)
Hart, Rt Hon Judith
Orbach, Maurice


Buchan, Norman
Hattersley, Rt Hon Roy
Orme, Rt Hon Stanley


Buchanan, Richard
Hatton, Frank
Ovenden, John


Butler, Mrs Joyce (Wood Green)
Hayman, Mrs Helene
Owen, Rt Hon Dr David


Callaghan, Rt Hon J. (Cardiff SE)
Healey, Rt Hon Denis
Padley, Walter


Callaghan, Jim (Middleton &amp; P)
Heifer, Eric S.
Palmer, Arthur


Campbell, Ian
Hooley, Frank
Park, George


Canavan, Dennis
Horam, John
Parker, John


Cant, R. B.
Howell, Rt Hon Denis (B'ham, Sm H)
Parry, Robert


Carmichael, Nell
Hoyle, Doug (Nelson)
Pavitt, Laurie


Carter, Ray
Huckfield, Les
Pendry, Tom


Carter-Jones, Lewis
Hughes, Rt Hon C. (Anglesey)
Perry, Ernest


Castle, Rt Hon Barbara
Hughes, Robert (Aberdeen N)
Phipps, Dr Colin


Clemitson, Ivor
Hughes. Roy (Newport)
Prentice, Rt Hon Reg


Cocks, Rt Hon Michael
Hunter, Adam
Price, C. (Lewisham W)


Cohen, Stanley
Irvine, Rt Hon Sir A. (Edge Hill)
Price, William (Rugby)


Coleman, Donald
Irving, Rt Hon S. (Dartford)
Radice, Giles


Colquhoun, Ms Maureen
Jackson, Colin (Brighouse)
Rees, Rt Hon Merlyn (Leeds S)


Concannon, J. D.
Jackson, Miss Margaret (Lincoln)
Richardson, Miss Jo


Conlan, Bernard
Janner, Greville
Roberts, Albert (Normanton)


Cook, Robin F. (Edin C)
Jay, Rt Hon Douglas
Roberts. Gwilym (Cannock)


Corbett, Robin
Jenkins, Hugh (Putney)
Robertson, John (Paisley)


Cowans, Harry
John, Brynmor
Robinson, Geoffrey


Cox, Thomas (Tooting)
Johnson, James (Hull West)
Roderick, Caerwyn


Craigen, J. M. (Maryhill)
Jones, Alec (Rhondda)
Rodgers, George (Chorley)


Crawshaw, Richard
Jones, Barry (East Flint)
Rodgers, Rt Hon William (Stockton)


Cronin, John
Jones, Dan (Burnley)
Rooker, J. W.


Crosland, Rt Hon Anthony
Kaufman, Gerald
Roper, John


Crowther, Stan (Rotherham)
Kilroy-Silk, Robert
Ross, Rt Hon W. (Kilmarnock)


Cryer, Bob
Kinnock, Neil
Rowlands, Ted


Cunningham, G. (Islington S)
Lambie, David
Sandelson, Neville


Davidson, Arthur
Lamborn, Harry
Sedgemore, Brian


Davies, Bryan (Enfield N)
Lamond, James
Selby, Harry


Davies, Denzil (Llanelli)
Latham, Arthur (Paddington)
Shaw, Arnold (Ilford South)


Davies, Ifor (Gower)
Leadbitter, Ted
Sheldon, Robert (Ashton-u-Lyne)


Davis, Clinton (Hackney C)
Lee, John
Shore, Rt Hon Peter


Deakins, Eric
Lestor, Miss Joan (Eton &amp; Slough)
Short, Mrs Renée (Wolv NE)


Dean, Joseph (Leeds West)
Lever, Rt Hon Harold
Silkin, Rt Hon John (Deptford)


Dell, Rt Hon Edmund
Lipton, Marcus
Sillars, James


Dempsey, James
Litterick, Tom
Silverman, Julius


Doig, Peter
Lomas, Kenneth
Skinner, Dennis


Dormand, J. D.
Loyden, Eddie
Small, William


Douglas-Mann, Bruce
Luard, Evan
Smith, John (N Lanarkshire)


Duffy, A. E. P.
Lyon, Alexander (York)
Snape, Peter


Dunn, James A.
Lyons, Edward (Bradford W)
Spearing. Nigel


Dunnett, Jack
Mabon, Dr J Dickson
Spriggs, Leslie


Eadie, Alex
McCartney, Hugh
Stallard, A. W.


Edge, Geoff
McDonald, Dr Oonagh
Stewart, Donald (Western Isles)


Edwards, Robert (Wolv SE)
McElhone, Frank
Stoddart, David


Ellis, John (Brigg &amp; Scun)
McGuire, Michael (Ince)
Stott, Roger


Ennals, David
MacKenzie, Gregor
Strang, Gavin


Evans, Fred (Caerphilly)
Mackintosh, John P.
Strauss, Rt Hon G. R.


Evans, Gwynfor (Carmarthen)
Maclennan, Robert
Summerskill, Hon Dr Shirley


Evans, Ioan (Aberdare)
McMillan, Tom (Glasgow C)
Swain, Thomas







Taylor, Mrs Ann (Bolton W)
Walker, Harold (Doncaster)
Williams, Sir Thomas (Warrington)


Thomas, Dafydd (Merioneth)
Walker, Terry (Kingswood)
Wilson, Alexander (Hamilton)


Thomas, Jeffrey (Abertillery)
Watkins, David
Wilson, RI Hon Sir Harold (Huyton)


Thomas, Mike (Newcastle E)
Watkinson, John
Wilson, William (Coventry SE)


Thomas, Ron (Bristol NW)
Weetch, Ken
Wise, Mrs Audrey


Thompson, George
Weitzman, David
Woodall, Alec


Thorne, Stan (Preston South)
Wellbeloved, James
Woof, Robert


Tierney, Sydney
White, Frank R. (Bury)
Wrigglesworth, Ian


Tinn, James
White, James (Pollok)
Young, David (Bolton E)


Tomlinson, John
Whitehead. Phillip



Torney, Tom
Whitlock, William
TELLERS FOR THE AYES:


Urwin, T. W.
Willey, Rt Hon Frederick
Mr. James Hamilton and


Varley. Rt Hon Eric G.
Williams. Alan (Swansea W)
Mr. Joseph Harper.


Walden, Brian (B'ham, L'dyw'd)
Williams, Rt Hon Shirley (Hertford)





NOES


Adley, Robert
Gardiner, George (Reigate)
Macmillan, Rt Hon M. (Farnham)


Alison, Michael
Gardiner, Edward (S Fylde)
McNair-Wilson, M. (Newbury)


Amery, Rt Hon Julian
Gilmour, Sir John (East Fife)
McNair-Wilson, P. (New Forest)


Atkins, Rt Hon H. (Spelthorne)
Glyn, Dr Alan
Madel, David


Awdry, Daniel
Godber, Rt Hon Joseph
Marten, Neil


Baker, Kenneth
Goodlad, Alastair
Mates, Michael


Banks, Robert
Gorst, John
Mather, Carol


Bell, Ronald
Gow, Ian (Eastbourne)
Maudling, Rt Hon Reginald


Bennett, Dr Reginald (Fareham)
Gower, Sir Raymond (Barry)
Mawby, Ray


Benyon, W.
Grant, Anthony (Harrow C)
Maxwell-Hyslop. Robin


Berry, Hon Anthony
Gray, Hamish
Mayhew, Patrick


Biggs-Davison, John
Grieve, Percy
Meyer, Sir Anthony


Blaker, Peter
Griffiths, Eldon
Miller, Hal (Bromsgrove)


Body, Richard
Grimond, Rt Hon J.
Mills, Peter


Boscawen, Hon Robert
Grist, Ian
Moate, Roger


Bottomley, Peter
Grylls, Michael
Monro, Hector


Bowden, A. (Brighton, Kemptown)
Hall, Sir John
Moore, John (Croydon C)


Boyson, Dr Rhodes (Brent)
Hall-Davis. A. G. F.
More, Jasper (Ludlow)


Braine, Sir Bernard
Hamilton, Michael (Salisbury)
Morris, Michael (Northampton S)


Brittan, Leon
Hampson, Dr Keith
Morrison, Charles (Devizes)


Brocklebank-Fowler, C.
Hannam, John
Morrison, Hon Peter (Chester)


Brotherton, Michael
Harvie Anderson, Rt Hon Miss
Mudd, David


Brown, Sir Edward (Bath)
Hastings, Stephen
Neave, Airey


Bryan, Sir Paul
Havers, Sir Michael
Nelson, Anthony


Buchanan-Smith, Alick
Hawkins, Paul
Neubert, Michael


Buck, Antony
Hayhoe, Barney
Newton, Tony


Budges, Nick
Heath, Rt Hon Edward
Nott, John


Bulmer, Esmond
Hicks, Robert
Onslow, Cranley


Burden, F. A.
Higgins, Terence L.
Oppenheim, Mrs Sally


Butler, Adam (Bosworth)
Hodgson, Robin
Page, John (Harlow West)


Chalker, Mrs Lynda
Holland, Philip
Page, Rt Hon R. Graham (Crosby)


Channon, Paul
Hordern, Peter
Page, Richard (Workington)


Churchill, W. S.
Howe, Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey
Pattie, Geoffrey


Clark, Alan (Plymouth, Sutton)
Howell, David (Guildford)
Penhaligon, David


Clark, William (Croydon S)
Howells, Geraint (Cardigan)
Percival, Ian


Clegg, Walter
Hunt, David (Wirral)
Peyton, Rt Hon John


Cockcroft, John
Hunt, John (Bromley)
Pink, R. Bonner


Cooke, Robert (Bristol W)
Hurd, Douglas
Price, David (Eastleigh)


Cope, John
Hutchison, Michael Clark
Prior, Rt Hon James


Cordle, John H.
Irving, Charles (Cheltenham)
Pym, Rt Hon Francis


Cormack, Patrick
James, David
Raison, Timothy


Corrie, John
Jenkin, Rt Hon P. (Wanst'd &amp; W'df'd)
Rathbone, Tim


Costain, A. P.
Jessel, Toby
Rees, Peter (Dover &amp; Deal)


Craig, Rt Hon W. (Belfast E)
Johnson Smith, G. (E Grinstead)
Rees-Davies, W. R.


Critchley, Julian
Johnston, Russell (Inverness)
Renton, Rt Hon Sir D. (Hunts)


Crowder, F. P.
Jones, Arthur (Daventry)
Ridley, Hon Nicholas


Davies, (Hon Rt , J. J Knutsford)
Jopling, Michael
Ridsdale, Julian


Dean, Paul (N Somerset)
Joseph, Rt Hon Sir Keith
Rifkind, Malcolm


Dodsworth, Geoffrey
Kaberry, Sir Donald
Rippon, Rt Hon Geoffrey


Douglas-Hamilton, Lord James
Kershaw, Anthony
Roberts, Michael (Cardiff NW)


Drayson, Burnaby
Kilfedder, James
Roberts, Wyn (Conway)


du Cann, Rt Hon Edward
Kimball, Marcus
Rodgers, Sir John (Sevenoaks)


Eden, Rt Hon Sir John
King, Evelyn (South Dorset)
Ross, Stephen (Isle of Wight)


Edwards, Nicholas (Pembroke)
King, Tom (Bridgwater)
Rossi, Hugh (Hornsey)


Elliott, Sir William
Kitson, Sir Timothy
Rost, Peter (SE Derbyshire)


Eyre, Reginald
Knox, David
Royle, Sir Anthony


Fairbairn, Nicholas
Lamont, Norman
Sainsbury, Tim


Fairgrieve, Russell
Langford-Holt, Sir John
St. John-Stevas, Norman


Farr, John
Latham, Michael (Melton)
Scott, Nicholas


Fell, Anthony
Lawrence, Ivan
Shaw, Giles (Pudsey)


Finsberg, Geoffrey
Lawson, Nigel
Shelton, William (Streatham)


Fletcher-Cooke, Charles
Lester, Jim (Beeston)
Shepherd, Colin


Fookes, Miss Janet
Lewis, Kenneth (Rutland)
Shersby, Michael


Forman, Nigel
Lloyd, Ian
Silvester, Fred


Fowler, Norman (Sutton C'f'd)
Loveridge, John
Sims, Roger


Fox, Marcus
McAdden, Sir Stephen
Sinclair, Sir George


Fraser, Rt Hon H. (Stafford &amp; St)
McCrindle, Robert
Skeet, T. H. H.


Fry, Peter
Macfarlane, Neil
Smith. Dudley (Warwick)


Galbraith, Hon. T. G. D.
MacGregor, John
Speed, Keith







Spence, John
Temple-Morris, Peter
Warren, Kenneth


Spicer, Michael (S Worcester)
Thatcher, Rt Hon Margaret
Weatherill, Bernard


Sproat, Iain
Thomas, Rt Hon P. (Hendon S)
Wells, John


Stanbrook, Ivor
Townsend, Cyril D.
Whitelaw, Rt Hon William


Stanley, John
Trotter, Neville
Winterton, Nicholas


Steen, Anthony (Wavertree)
Tugendhat, Christopher
Wood, Rt Hon Richard


Stewart, Ian (Hitchin)
van Straubenzee, W. R.
Young, Sir G. (Ealing, Acton)


Stokes, John
Vaughan, Dr Gerard
Younger, Hon George


Stradling Thomas, J.
Viggers, Peter



Tapsell, Peter
Wakeham, John
TELLERS FOR THE NOES:


Taylor, R. (Croydon NW)
Walder, David (Clitheroe)
Mr. Spencer Le Marchant and


Taylor, Teddy (Cathcart)
Walker, Rt Hon P. (Worcester)
Mr, Cecil Parkinson.


Tebbit, Norman






Division List No. 423 [See c. 1730]


Division No. 423.]
AYES
[11.57 a.m.


Abse, Leo
Duffy, A. E. P.
Lamond, James


Allaun, Frank
Dunn, James A.
Latham, Arthur (Paddington)


Anderson, Donald
Dunnett, Jack
Leadbitter, Ted


Archer, Peter
Eadie, Alex
Lee, John


Armstrong, Ernest
Edge, Geoff
Lestor, Miss Joan (Eton &amp; Slough)


Ashley, Jack
Edwards, Robert (Wolv SE)
Lever, Rt Hon Harold


Ashton, Joe
Ellis, John (Brigg &amp; Scun)
Lipton, Marcus


Atkins, Ronald (Preston N)
Ennals, David
Litterick, Tom


Atkinson, Norman
Evans, Fred (Caerphilly)
Lomas, Kenneth


Bagier, Gordon A. T.
Evans, Gwynfor (Carmarthen)
Loyden, Eddie


Bain, Mrs Margaret
Evans, Ioan (Aberdare)
Luard, Evan


Barnett, Guy (Greenwich)
Ewing, Harry (Stirling)
Lyon, Atexander (York)


Barnett, Rt Hon Joel (Heywood)
Faulds, Andrew
Lyons, Edward (Bradford W)


Bates, Alf
Fernyhough, Rt Hon E.
Mabon, Dr J Dickson


Bean, R. E.
Fitch, Alan (Wigan)
McCartney, Hugh


Bidwell, Sydney
Flannery, Marlin
McDonald, Dr Oonagh


Bishop, E. S.
Foot, Rt Hon Michael
McElhone, Frank


Blenkinsop, Arthur
Ford, Ben
McGuire, Michael (Ince)


Boardman, H.
Forrester, John
MacKenzie, Gregor


Booth, Rt Hon Albert
Fowler, Gerald (The Wrekin)
Mackintosh, John P.


Bottomley, Rt Hon Arthur
Fraser, John (Lambeth, N'w'd)
Maclennan, Robert


Boyden, James (Bish Auck)
Freeson, Reginald
McMillan, Tom (Glasgow C)


Bradley, Tom
Garrett, John (Norwich S)
McNamara, Kevin


Bray, Dr Jeremy
Garrett, W. E. (Wallsend)
Madden, Max


Brown, Hugh D. (Provan)
George, Bruce
Mahon, Simon


Brown, Robert C. (Newcastle WI
Gilbert, Dr John
Mallalieu, J. P. W.


Brown, Ronald (Hackney S)
Ginsburg, David
Marks, Kenneth


Buchan, Norman
Golding, John
Marquand, David


Buchanan, Richard
Gould, Bryan
Marshall, Dr Edmund (Goole)


Butler, Mrs Joyce (Wood Green)
Gourlay. Harry
Marshall, Jim (Leicester S)


Callaghan, Rt Hon J. (Cardiff SE)
Grant, George (Morpeth)
Maynard, Miss Joan


Callaghan, Jim (Middleton &amp; P)
Grant, John (Islington C)
Meacher, Michael


Campbell, Ian
Grocott, Bruce
Mellish, Rt Hon Robert


Canavan, Dennis
Hamilton, James (Bothwell)
Mikardo, Ian


Cant, R. B.
Hardy, Peter
Millan, Rt Hon Bruce


Carmichael, Neil
Harrison, Walter (Wakefield)
Miller, Dr M. S. (E Kilbride)


Carter, Ray
Hart, Rt Hon Judith
Miller, Mrs Millie (Ilford N)


Carter-Jones, Lewis
Hattersley, Rt Hon Roy
Morris, Alfred (Wythenshawe)


Castle, Rt Hon Barbara
Hatton, Frank
Morris, Charles R. (Openshaw)


Clemitson, Ivor
Hayman, Mrs Helene
Morris, Rt Hon J. (Aberavon)


Cocks, Rt Hon Michael
Healey, Rt Hon Denis
Moyle, Roland


Cohen, Stanley
Helfer, Eric S.
Mulley, Rt Hon Frederick


Coleman, Donald
Hooley, Frank
Newens, Stanley


Colquhoun, Ms Maureen
Horam, John
Noble, Mike


Concannon, J. D.
Howell. Rt Hon Denis (B'ham, Sm H)
Oakes, Gordon


Conlan, Bernard
Hoyle, Doug (Nelson)
Ogden, Eric


Cook, Robin F. (Edin C)
Huckfield, Les
O'Haltoran, Michael


Corbett, Robin
Hughes, Rt Hon C. (Anglesey)
Orbach, Maurice


Cowans. Harry
Hughes, Robert (Aberdeen N)
Orme, Rt Hon Stanley


Cox, Thomas (Tooting)
Hughes, Roy (Newport)
Ovenden, John


Craigen, J. M. (Maryhill)
Hunter, Adam
Owen, Rt Hon Dr David


Crawshaw, Richard
Irvine, Rt Hon Sir A. (Edge Hill)
Padley, Walter


Cronin, John
Irving, Rt Hon S. (Dartford)
Palmer, Arthur


Crosland, Rt Hon Anthony
Jackson, Cotin (Brighouse)
Park, George


Crowther, Stan (Rotherham)
Jackson, Miss Margaret (Lincoln)
Parker, John


Cryer, Bob
Janner, Greville
Parry, Robert


Cunningham, G. (Islington S)
Jay, Rt Hon Douglas
Pavitt, Laurie


Davidson, Arthur
Jenkins, Hugh (Putney)
Pendry, Tom


Davies, Bryan (Enfield N)
John, Brynmor
Perry, Ernest


Davies, Denzil (Llanelli)
Johnson, James (Hull West)
Phipps, Dr Colin


Davies, Ifor (Gower)
Jones, Alec (Rhondda)
Prentice, Rt Hon Reg


Davis, Clinton (Hackney C)
Jones, Barry (East Flint)
Price, C. (Lewisham W)


Deakins, Eric
Jones, Dan (Burnley)
Price, William (Rugby)


Dean, Joseph (Leeds West)
Kaufman, Gerald
Radice, Giles


Dell, Rt Hon Edmund
Kelley, Richard
Rees, Rt Hon Merlyn (Leeds S)


Dempsey, James
Kilroy-Silk, Robert
Richardson, Miss Jo


Doig, Peter
Kinnock, Neil
Roberts, Albert (Normanton)


Dormand, J. D.
Lambie, David
Roberts, Gwilym (Cannock)


Douglas-Mann, Bruce
Lamborn, Harry








Robertson, John (Paisley)
Spriggs, Leslie
Watkins, David


Robinson, Geoffrey
Stallard, A. W.
Watkinson, John


Roderick, Caerwyn
Stewart, Donald (Western Isles)
Weetch, Ken


Rodgers, George (Chorley)
Stoddart, David
Weitzman, David


Rodgers, Rt Hon William (Stockton)
Stott, Roger
Wellbeloved, James


Rooker, J. W.
Strang, Gavin
White, Frank R. (Bury)


Roper, John
Strauss, Rt Hon G. R.
White, James (Pollok)


Rose, Paul B.
Summerskill, Hon Dr Shirley
Whitehead, Phillip


Ross, Rt Hon W. (Kilmarnock)
Swain, Thomas
Whitlock, William


Rowlands, Ted
Taylor, Mrs Ann (Bolton W)
Willey, Rt Hon Frederick


Ryman, John
Thomas, Dafydd (Merioneth)
Williams, Alan (Swansea W)


Sandelson, Neville
Thomas, Jeffrey (Abertillery)
Williams, Rt Hon Shirley (Hertford)


Sedgemore, Brian
Thomas, Mike (Newcastle E)
Williams, Sir Thomas (Warrington)


Selby, Harry
Thomas, Ron (Bristol NW)
Wilson, Alexander (Hamilton)


Shaw, Arnold (Ilford South)
Thompson, George
Wilson, Rt Hon Sir Harold (Huyton)


Sheldon, Robert (Ashton-u-Lyne)
Thorne, Stan (Preston South)
Wilson, William (Coventry SE)


Shore, Rt Hon Peter
Tierney, Sydney
Wise, Mrs Audrey


Short, Mrs Renée (Wolv NE)
Tinn, James
Woodall, Alec


Silkin, Rt Hon John (Deptford)
Tomlinson, John
Woof, Robert


Sillars, James
Torney, Tom
Wrigglesworth, Ian


Silverman, Julius
Urwin, T. W.
Young, David (Bolton E)


Skinner, Dennis
Varley, Rt Hon Eric G.



Small, William
Walden, Brian (B'ham, L'dyw'd)
TELLERS FOR THE AYES:


Smith, John (N Lanarkshire)
Walker, Harold (Doncaster)
Mr. Ted Graham and


Snape, Peter
Walker, Terry (Kingswood)
Mr. Joseph Harper.


Spearing, Nigel






NOES


Adley, Robert
Eyre, Reginald
Jessel, Toby


Aitken, Jonathan
Fairbairn, Nicholas
Johnson Smith, G. (E Grinstead)


Alison, Michael
Fairgrieve, Russell
Johnston, Russell (Inverness)


Amery, Rt Hon Julian
Farr, John
Jones, Arthur (Daventry)


Atkins, Rt Hon H. (Spelthorne)
Fell, Anthony
Jopling, Michael


Awdry, Daniel
Finsberg, Geoffrey
Joseph, Rt Hon Sir Keith


Baker, Kenneth
Fisher, Sir Nigel
Kaberry, Sir Donald


Banks, Robert
Fletcher-Cooke, Charles
Kershaw, Anthony


Bell, Ronald
Fookes, Miss Janet
Kilfedder, James


Bennett, Sir Frederic (Torbay)
Forman, Nigel
Kimball, Marcus


Bennett, Dr Reginald (Fareham)
Fowler, Norman (Sutton C'f'd)
King, Evelyn (South Dorset)


Benyon, W.
Fox, Marcus
King, Tom (Bridgwater)


Biffen, John
Fraser, Rt Hon H. (Stafford &amp; St)
Kitson, Sir Timothy


Biggs-Davison, John
Fry, Peter
Knox, David


Blaker, Peter
Galbraith, Hon. T. G. D.
Lamont, Norman


Body, Richard
Gardiner, George (Reigate)
Langford-Holt, Sir John


Boscawen, Hon Robert
Gardiner, Edward (S Fylde)
Latham, Michael (Melton)


Bottomley, Peter
Gilmour, Sir John (East Fife)
Lawrence, Ivan


Bowden, A. (Brighton, Kemptown)
Glyn, Dr Alan
Lawson, Nigel


Boyson, Dr Rhodes (Brent)
Godber, Rt Hon Joseph
Le Marchant, Spencer


Braine, Sir Bernard
Goodlad, Alastair
Lester, Jim (Beeston)


Brittan, Leon
Gorst, John
Lewis, Kenneth (Rutland)


Brocklebank-Fowler, C.
Gow, Ian (Eastbourne)
Lloyd, Ian


Brotherton, Michael
Gower, Sir Raymond (Barry)
Loveridge, John


Brown, Sir Edward (Bath)
Grant, Anthony (Harrow C)
McAdden, Sir Stephen


Bryan, Sir Paul
Gray, Hamish
McCrindle, Robert


Buchanan-Smith, Alick
Grieve, Percy
Macfarlane, Neil


Buck, Antony
Griffiths, Eldon
MacGregor, John


Budgen, Nick
Grimond, Rt Hon J.
Macmillan, Rt Hon M. (Farnham)


Bulmer, Esmond
Grist, Ian
McNair-Wilson, M. (Newbury)


Burden, F. A.
Grylls, Michael
McNair-Wilson, P. (New Forest)


Butler, Adam (Bosworth)
Hall, Sir John
Madel, David


Chalker, Mrs Lynda
Hall-Davis, A. G. F.
Marten, Neil


Channon, Paul
Hamilton, Michael (Salisbury)
Mates, Michael


Churchill, W. S.
Hampson, Dr Keith
Mather, Carol


Clark, Alan (Plymouth, Sutton)
Hannam, John
Maude, Angus


Clark, William (Croydon S)
Harvie Anderson, Rt Hon Mist
Maudling, Rt Hon Reginald


Clegg, Walter
Hastings, Stephen
Mawby, Ray


Cockcroft, John
Havers, Sir Michael
Maxwell-Hyslop, Robin


Cooke, Robert (Bristol W)
Hawkins, Paul
Mayhew, Patrick


Cope, John
Hayhoe, Barney
Meyer, Sir Anthony


Cordle, John H.
Heath, Rt Hon Edward
Miller, Hal (Bromsgrove)


Cormack, Patrick
Hicks, Robert
Mills, Peter


Costain, A. P.
Higgins, Terence L.
Miscampbell, Norman


Craig, Rt Hon W. (Belfast E)
Hodgson, Robin
Moate, Roger


Critchley, Julian
Holland, Philip
Monro, Hector


Crowder, F. P.
Hordern, Peter
Montgomery, Fergus


Davies, Rt Hon J. (Knutsford)
Howe, Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey
Moore, John (Croydon C)


Dean, Paul (N Somerset)
Howell, David (Guildford)
More, Jasper (Ludlow)


Dodsworth, Geoffrey
Howells, Geraint (Cardigan)
Morris, Michael (Northampton S)


Douglas-Hamilton, Lord James
Hunt, David (Wirral)
Morrison, Charles (Devizes)


Drayson, Burnaby
Hunt, John (Bromley)
Morrison, Hon Peter (Chester)


du Cann, Rt Hon Edward
Hurd, Douglas
Mudd, David


Eden, Rt Hon Sir John
Hutchison, Michael Clark
Neave, Airey


Edwards, Nicholas (Pembroke)
Irving, Charles (Cheltenham)
Nelson, Anthony


Elliott, Sir William
James, David
Neubert, Michael


Emery, Peter
Jenkin, Rt Hon P. (Wanst'd &amp; W'df'd)
Newton, Tony







Nott, John
Ross, Stephen (Isle of Wight)
Taylor, Teddy (Cathcart)


Onslow, Cranley
Rossi, Hugh (Hornsey)
Tebbit, Norman


Oppenheim, Mrs Sally
Rost, Peter (SE Derbyshire)
Temple-Morris, Peter


Page, John (Harrow West)
Royle, Sir Anthony
Thatcher, Rt Hon Margaret


Page, Rt Hon R. Graham (Crosby)
Sainsbury, Tim
Thomas, Rt Hon P. (Hendon S)


Page, Richard (Workington)
St. John-Stevas, Norman
Thorpe, Rt Hon Jeremy (N Devon)


Pardoe, John
Scott, Nicholas
Townsend, Cyril D.


Parkinson, Cecil
Shaw, Giles (Pudsey)
Trotter, Neville


Pattie, Geoffrey
Shelton, William (Streatham)
Tugendhat, Christopher


Penhaligon, David
Shepherd, Colin
van Straubenzee, W. R


Percival, Ian
Shersby, Michael
Vaughan, Dr Gerard


Peyton, Rt Hon John
Silvester, Fred
Viggers, Peter


Pink, R. Bonner
Sims, Roger
Wakeham, John


Price, David (Eastleigh)
Sinclair, Sir George
Walder, David (Clitheroe)


Prior, Rt Hon James
Skeet, T. H. H.
Walker, Rt Hon P. (Worcester)


Pym, Rt Hon Francis
Smith, Dudley (Warwick)
Warren, Kenneth


Raison, Timothy
Speed, Keith
Weatherill, Bernard


Rathbone, Tim
Spence, John
Wells, John


Rees, Peter (Dover &amp; Deal)
Spicer, Michael (S Worcester)
Whitelaw, Rt Hon William


Rees-Davies, W. R.
Sproat, Iain
Winterton, Nicholas


Renton, Rt Hon Sir D. (Hunts)
Stanbrook, Ivor
Wood, Rt Hon Richard


Ridley, Hon Nicholas
Stanley, John
Young, Sir G. (Ealing, Acton)


Ridsdale, Julian
Steen, Anthony (Wavertree)
Younger, Hon George


Rifkind, Malcolm
Stewart, Ian (Hitchin)



Rippon, Rt Hon Geoffrey
Stokes, John
TELLERS FOR THE NOES:


Roberts, Michael (Cardiff NW)
Tapsell, Peter
Mr. John Corrie and


Roberts, Wyn (Conway)
Taylor, R. (Croydon NW)
Mr. Anthony Berry.


Rodgers, Sir John (Sevenoaks)






Division List No. 424 [See c. 1738]


Division No. 424.]
AYES
[12.31 p.m.


Abse, Leo
Davidson, Arthur
Hayman, Mrs Helene


Allaun, Frank
Davies, Bryan (Enfield N)
Healey, Rt Hon Denis


Anderson, Donald
Davies, Derail (Llanelli)
Heffer, Eric S.


Archer, Peter
Davies, Ifor (Gower)
Hooley, Frank


Armstrong, Ernest
Davis, Clinton (Hackney C)
Horam, John


Ashley, Jack
Deakins, Eric
Howell, Rt Hon Denis (B'ham, Sm H)


Atkins, Ronald (Preston N)
Dean, Joseph (Leeds West)
Hoyle, Doug (Nelson)


Atkinson, Norman
Dell, Rt Hon Edmund
Huckfield, Les


Bagier, Gordon A. T.
Dempsey, James
Hughes, Rt Hon C. (Anglesey)


Barnett, Guy (Greenwich)
Doig, Peter
Hughes, Robert (Aberdeen N)


Barnett, Rt Hon Joel (Heywood)
Dormand, J. D.
Hughes, Roy (Newport)


Bates, Alf
Douglas-Mann, Bruce
Hunter, Adam


Bean, R. E.
Duffy, A. E. P.
Irvine, Rt Hon Sir A. (Edge Hill)


Bidwell, Sydney
Dunn, James A.
Irving, Rt Hon S. (Dartford)


Bishop, E. S.
Dunnett, Jack
Jackson, Colin (Brighouse)


Blenkinsop, Arthur
Eadie, Alex
Jackson, Miss Margaret (Lincoln)


Boardman, H.
Edge, Geoff
Janner, Greville


Booth, Rt Hon Albert
Edwards, Robert (Wolv SE)
Jay, Rt Hon Douglas


Bottomley, Rt Hon Arthur
Ellis, John (Brigg &amp; Scun)
Jenkins, Hugh (Putney)


Boyden, James (Bish Auck)
Ennals, David
John, Brynmor


Bradley, Tom
Evans, Fred (Caerphilly)
Johnson, James (Hull West)


Brown, Hugh D. (Proven)
Evans, Gwynfor (Carmarthen)
Jones, Alec (Rhondda)


Brown, Robert C. (Newcastle W)
Evans, Ioan (Aberdare)
Jones, Barry (East Flint)


Brown, Ronald (Hackney S)
Ewing, Harry (Stirling)
Jones, Dan (Burnley)


Buchan, Norman
Faulds, Andrew
Kaufman, Gerald


Buchanan, Richard
Fernyhough, Rt Hon E.
Kelley, Richard


Butler, Mrs Joyce (Wood Green)
Fitch, Alan (Wigan)
Kilroy-Silk, Robert


Callaghan, Rt Hon J. (Cardiff SE)
Fitt, Gerard (Belfast W)
Kinnock, Neil


Callaghan, Jim (Middleton &amp; P)
Flannery, Martin
Lambie, David


Campbell, Ian
Foot, Rt Hon Michael
Lamborn, Harry


Canavan, Dennis
Ford, Ben
Lamond, James


Cant, R. B.
Forrester, John
Latham, Arthur (Paddington)


Carmichael, Neil
Fowler, Gerald (The Wrekin)
Leadbitter, Ted


Carter, Ray
Fraser, John (Lambeth, N'w'd)
Lee, John


Carter-Jones, Lewis
Freeson, Reginald
Lestor, Miss Joan (Eton &amp; Slough)


Castle, Rt Hon Barbara
Garrett, John (Norwich S)
Lever, Rt Hon Harold


Clemitson, Ivor
Garrett, W. E. (Wallsend)
Lipton, Marcus


Cocks, Rt Hon Michael
George, Bruce
Litterick, Tom


Cohen, Stanley
Gilbert, Dr John
Lomas, Kenneth


Coleman, Donald
Ginsburg, David
Loyden, Eddie


Colquhoun, Ms Maureen
Golding, John
Luard, Evan


Concannon, J. D.
Gould, Bryan
Lyon, Alexander (York)


Conlan, Bernard
Gourlay, Harry
Lyons, Edward (Bradford W)


Cook, Robin F. (Edin C)
Graham, Ted
Mabon, Dr J Dickson


Corbett, Robin
Grant, George (Morpeth)
McCartney, Hugh


Cowans, Harry
Grant, John (Islington C)
McDonald, Dr Oonagh


Cox, Thomas (Tooting)
Grocott, Bruce
McElhone, Frank


Craigen, J. M. (Maryhill)
Hamilton, James (Bothwell)
McGuire, Michael (Ince)


Crawshaw, Richard
Hardy, Peter
MacKenzie, Gregor


Cronin, John
Harper, Joseph
Mackintosh, John P.


Crosland, Rt Hon Anthony
Harrison, Walter (Wakefield)
Maclennan, Robert


Crowther, Stan (Rotherham)
Hart, Rt Hon Judith
McMillan, Tom (Glasgow C)


Cryer, Bob
Hattersley, Rt Hon Roy
McNamara, Kevin


Cunningham, G. (Islington S)
Hatton, Frank
Madden, Max







Mahon, Simon
Radice, Giles
Thomas, Dafydd (Merioneth)


Mallalieu, J. P. W.
Rees, Rt Hon Merlyn (Leeds S)
Thomas, Jeffrey (Abertillery)


Marks, Kenneth
Richardson, Miss Jo
Thomas, Mike (Newcastle E)


Marquand, David
Roberts, Albert (Normanton)
Thomas, Ron (Bristol NW)


Marshall, Or Edmund (Goole)
Roberts, Gwilym (Cannock)
Thorne, Stan (Preston South)


Marshall, Jim (Leicester S)
Robertson, John (Paisley)
Tierney, Sydney


Maynard, Miss Joan
Robinson, Geoffrey
Tinn, James


Meacher, Michael
Roderick, Caerwyn
Tomlinson, John


Mellish, Rt Hon Robert
Rodgers, George (Chorley)
Torney, Tom


Mikardo, Ian
Rodgers, Rt Hon William (Stockton)
Urwin, T. W.


Millan, Rt Hon Bruce
Rooker, J. W.
Varley, Rt Hon Eric G.


Miller, Dr M. S. (E Kilbride)
Roper, John
Walden, Brian (B'ham, L'dyw'd)


Miller, Mrs Millie (llford N)
Rose, Paul B.
Walker, Harold (Doncaster)


Morris, Alfred (Wythenshawe)
Ross, Rt Hon W. (Kilmarnock)
Walker, Terry (Kingswood)


Morris, Charles R. (Openshaw)
Rowlands, Ted
Watkins, David


Morris, Rt Hon J. (Aberavon)
Ryman, John
Watkinson, John


Moyle, Roland
Sandelson, Neville
Weetch, Ken


Mulley, Rt Hon Frederick
Sedgemore, Brian
Weitzman, David


Newens, Stanley
Selby, Harry
Wellbeloved, James


Noble, Mike
Shaw, Arnold (llford South)
White, James (Pollok)


Oakes, Gordon
Sheldon, Robert (Ashton-u-Lyne)
Whitehead, Phillip


Ogden, Eric
Short, Mrs Renée (Wolv NE)
Whillock, William


O'Halloran, Michael
Silkin, Rt Hon John (Deptford)
Willey, Rt Hon Frederick


Orbach, Maurice
Sillars, James
Williams, Alan (Swansea W)


Orme, Rt Hon Stanley
Silverman, Julius
Williams, Rt Hon Shirley (Hertford)


Ovenden, John
Skinner, Dennis
Williams, Sir Thomas (Warrington)


Owen, Rt Hon Dr David
Small, William
Wilson, Alexander (Hamilton)


Padley, Walter
Smith, John (N Lanarkshire)
Wilson, Rt Hon Sir Harold (Huyton)


Palmer, Arthur
Snaps, Peter
Wilson, William (Coventry SE)


Park, George
Spearing, Nigel
Wise, Mrs Audrey


Parker, John
Spriggs, Leslie
Woodall, Alec


Parry, Robert
Stallard, A. W.
Woof, Robert


Pavitt, Laurie
Stoddart, David
Wrigglesworth, Ian


Pendry, Tom
Stott, Roger
Young, David (Bolton E)


Perry, Ernest
Strang, Gavin



Phipps, Dr Colin
Strauss, Rt Hon G. R.
TELLERS FOR THE AYES:


Prentice, Rt Hon Reg
Summerskill, Hon Dr Shirley
Mr. Joseph Ashton and


Price, C. (Lewisham W)
Swain, Thomas
Mr. Frank White.


Price, William (Rugby)
Taylor, Mrs Ann (Bolton W)





NOES


Adley, Robert
Corrie, John
Grylls, Michael


Aitken, Jonathan
Costain, A. P.
Hall, Sir John


Amery, Rt Hon Julian
Craig, Rt Hon W. (Belfast E)
Hall-Davis, A. G. F.


Atkins, Rt Hon H. (Spelthorne)
Critchley, Julian
Hamilton, Michael (Salisbury)


Awdry, Daniel
Crowder, F. P.
Hannam,John


Baker, Kenneth
Davies, Rt Hon J. (Knutsford)
Harvie Anderson, Rt Hon Miss


Banks, Robert
Dean, Paul (N Somerset)
Hastings, Stephen


Bell, Ronald
Dodsworth, Geoffrey
Havers, Sir Michael


Bennett, Sir Frederic (Torbay)
Douglas-Hamilton, Lord James
Hawkins, Paul


Bennett, Dr Reginald (Fareham)
Drayson, Burnaby
Hayhoe, Barney


Benyon, W.
du Cann, Rt Hon Edward
Heath, Rt Hon Edward


Berry, Hon Anthony
Dunlop, John
Hicks, Robert


Biffen, John
Eden, Rt Hon Sir John
Higgins, Terence L.


Biggs-Davison, John
Edwards, Nicholas (Pembroke)
Hodgson, Robin


Blaker, Peter
Elliott, Sir William
Holland, Philip


Body, Richard
Emery, Peter
Hordern, Peter


Boscawen, Hon Robert
Eyre, Reginald
Howe, Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey


Bottomley, Peter
Fairbairn, Nicholas
Howell, David (Gulldford)


Bowden, A. (Brighton, Kemptown)
Fairgrieve, Russell
Howells, Geraint (Cardigan)


Boyson, Dr Rhodes (Brent)
Farr, John
Hunt, David (Wirral)


Bradford, Rev Robert
Fell, Anthony
Hunt, John (Bromley)


Braine, Sir Bernard
Finsberg, Geoffrey
Hurd, Douglas


Brittan, Leon
Fisher, Sir Nigel
Hutchison, Michael Clark


Brocklebank-Fowler, C.
Fletcher-Cooke, Charles
Irving, Charles (Cheltenham)


Brotherton, Michael
Fookes, Miss Janet
James, David


Brown, Sir Edward (Bath)
Forman, Nigel
Jenkin, Rt Hon P. (Wanst'd &amp; W'df'd)


Buchanan-Smith, Alick
Fowler, Norman (Sutton C'f'd)
Jessel, Toby


Buck, Antony
Fox, Marcus
Johnson Smith, G. (E Grinstead)


Budgen, Nick
Fraser, Rt Hon H. (Stafford &amp; St)
Johnston, Russell (Inverness)


Bulmer, Esmond
Fry, Peter
Jones, Arthur (Daventry)


Burden, F. A.
Galbraith, Hon. T. G. D.
Jopling, Michael


Butler, Adam (Bosworth)
Gardiner, George (Reigate)
Joseph, Rt Hon Sir Keith


Carson, John
Gardiner, Edward (S Fylde)
Kaberry, Sir Donald


Chalker, Mrs Lynda
Gilmour, Sir John (East Fife)
Kershaw, Anthony


Channon, Paul
Glyn, Dr Alan
Kilfedder, James


Churchill, W. S.
Godber, Rt Hon Joseph
Kimball, Marcus


Clark, Alan (Plymouth, Sutton)
Goodlad, Alastair
King, Evelyn (South Dorset)


Clark, William (Croydon S)
Gorst, John
Kitson, Sir Timothy


Clegs, Walter
Gower, Sir Raymond (Barry)
Knox, David


Cockcroft, John
Gray, Hamish
Lamont, Norman


Cooke, Robert (Bristol W)
Grieve, Percy
Langford-Holt, Sir John


Cope, John
Griffiths, Eldon
Latham, Michael (Melton)


Cordle, John H.
Grimond, Rt Hon J.
Lawrence, Ivan


Cormack, Patrick
Grist, Ian
Lawson, Nigel







Le Marchant, Spencer
Page, John (Harrow West)
Sinclair, Sir George


Lester, Jim (Beeston)
Page, Rt Hon R. Graham (Crosby)
Skeet, T. H. H.


Lewis, Kenneth (Rutland)
Page, Richard (Workington)
Smith, Dudley (Warwick)


Lloyd, Ian
Paisley, Rev Ian
Speed, Keith


Loveridge, John
Pardoe, John
Spence, John


McAdden, Sir Stephen
Parkinson, Cecil
Spicer, Michael (S Worcester)


McCrindle, Robert
Pattie, Geoffrey
Sproat, Iain


McCusker, H.
Penhaligon, David
Stanbrook, Ivor


Macfarlane, Neil
Percival, Ian
Stanley, John


MacGregor, John
Peyton, Rt Hon John
Steen, Anthony (Wavertree)


Macmillan, Rt Hon M. (Farnham)
Pink, R. Bonner
Stewart, Ian (Hitchin)


McNair-Wilson, M. (Newbury)
Powell, Rt Hon J. Enoch
Stokes, John


McNair-Wilson, P. (New Forest)
Price, David (Eastleigh)
Tapsell, Peter


Madel, David
Prior, Rt Hon James
Taylor, R. (Croydon NW)


Marten, Neil
Pym, Rt Hon Francis
Taylor, Teddy (Cathcart)


Mates, Michael
Raison, Timothy
Tebbit, Norman


Maude, Angus
Rathbone, Tim
Temple-Morris, Peter


Mawby, Ray
Rees, Peter (Dover &amp; Deal)
Thatcher, Rt Hon Margaret


Maxwell-Hyslop, Robin
Rees-Davies, W. R.
Thomas, Rt Hon P. (Hendon S)


Mayhew, Patrick
Renton, Rt Hon Sir D. (Hunts)
Thorpe, Rt Hon Jeremy (N Devon)


Meyer, Sir Anthony
Ridley, Hon Nicholas
Townsend, Cyril D.


Miller, Hal (Bromsgrove)
Ridsdale, Julian
Trotter, Neville


Mills, Peter
Rifkind, Malcolm
Tugendhat, Christopher


Miscampbell, Norman
Rippon, Rt Hon Geoffrey
van Straubenzee, W. R.


Moate, Roger
Roberts, Michael (Cardiff NW)
Vaughan, Dr Gerard


Molyneaux, James
Roberts, Wyn (Conway)
Viggers, Peter


Monro, Hector
Rodgers, Sir John (Sevenoaks)
Wakeham, John


Montgomery, Fergus
Ross, Stephen (Isle of Wight)
Walder, David (Clitheroe)


Moore, John (Croydon C)
Ross, William (Londonderry)
Warren, Kenneth


More, Jasper (Ludlow)
Rossi, Hugh (Hornsey)
Weatherill, Bernard


Morris, Michael (Northampton S)
Rost, Peter (SE Derbyshire)
Wells, John


Morrison, Charles (Devizes)
Royle, Sir Anthony
Whitelaw, Rt Hon William


Morrison, Hon Peter (Chester)
Sainsbury, Tim
Winterton, Nicholas


Mudd, David
SI. John-Stevas, Norman
Wood, Rt Hon Richard


Neave, Airey
Scott, Nicholas
Young, Sir G. (Ealing, Acton)


Nelson, Anthony
Shaw, Giles (Pudsey)
Younger, Hon George


Neubert, Michael
Shelton, William (Streatham)



Newton, Tony
Shepherd, Colin
TELLERS FOR THE NOES:


Nott, John
Shersby, Michael
Mr. Carol Mather and


Onslow, Cranley
Sims, Roger
Mr. Fred Silvester.


Oppenheim, Mrs Sally






Division List No. 425 [See c. 1741]


Division No. 425.]
AYES
[12.51 p.m.


Abse, Leo
Colquhoun, Ms Maureen
Fitch, Alan (Wigan)


Allaun, Frank
Concannon, J. D.
Fitt, Gerard (Belfast W)


Anderson, Donald
Conlan, Bernard
Flannery, Martin


Archer, Peter
Cook, Robin F. (Edin C)
Foot, Rt Hon Michael


Armstrong, Ernest
Corbett, Robin
Ford, Ben


Ashley, Jack
Cowans, Harry
Forrester, John


Atkins, Ronald (Preston N)
Cox, Thomas (Tooting)
Fowler, Gerald (The Wrekin)


Atkinson, Norman
Craigen, J. M. (Maryhill)
Fraser, John (Lambeth, N'w'd)


Bagier, Gordon A. T.
Crawshaw, Richard
Freeson, Reginald


Bain, Mrs Margaret
Cronin, John
Garrett, John (Norwich S)


Barnett, Guy (Greenwich)
Crosland, Rt Hon Anthony
Garrett, W. E. (Wallsend)


Barnett, Rt Hon Joel (Heywood)
Crowther, Stan (Rotherham)
George, Bruce


Bates, Alf
Cryer, Bob
Gilbert, Dr John


Bean, R. E.
Cunningham, G. (Islington S)
Ginsburg, David


Bidwell, Sydney
Davidson, Arthur
Golding, John


Bishop, E. S.
Davies, Bryan (Enfield N)
Gould, Bryan


Blenkinsop, Arthur
Davies, Denzil (Llanelli)
Gourlay, Harry


Boardman, H.
Davies, Ifor (Gower)
Grant, George (Morpeth)


Booth, Rt Hon Albert
Davis, Clinton (Hackney C)
Grant, John (Islington C)


Bottomley, Rt Hon Arthur
Deakins, Eric
Grocott, Bruce


Boyden, James (Bish Auck)
Dean, Joseph (Leeds West)
Hamilton, James (Bothwell)


Bradley, Tom
Dell, Rt Hon Edmund
Hardy, Peter


Brown, Hugh D. (Provan)
Dempsey, James
Harper, Joseph


Brown, Robert C. (Newcastle W)
Doig, Peter
Harrison, Walter (Wakefield)


Brown, Ronald (Hackney S)
Dormand, J. D.
Hart, Rt Hon Judith


Buchan, Norman
Douglas-Mann, Bruce
Hattersley, Rt Hon Roy


Buchanan, Richard
Duffy, A. E. P.
Hatton, Frank


Butler, Mrs Joyce (Wood Green)
Dunn, James A.
Hayman, Mrs Helene


Callaghan, Rt Hon J. (Cardiff SE)
Dunnett, Jack
Healey, Rt Hon Denis


Callaghan, Jim (Middleton &amp; P)
Eadie, Alex
Heffer, Eric S.


Campbell, Ian
Edge, Geoff
Hooley, Frank


Canavan, Dennis
Edwards, Robert (Wolv SE)
Horam, John


Cant, R. B.
Ellis, John (Brigg &amp; Scun)
Howell, Rt Hon Denis (B'ham, Sm H)


Carmichael, Neil
English, Michael
Hoyle, Doug (Nelson)


Carter, Ray
Ennals, David
Huckfield, Las


Carter-Jones, Lewis
Evans, Fred (Caerphilly)
Hughes, Rt Hon C. (Anglesey)


Castle, Rt Hon Barbara
Evans, Gwynfor (Carmarthen)
Hughes, Robert (Aberdeen N)


Clemitson, Ivor
Evans, Ioan (Aberdare)
Hughes, Roy (Newport)


Cocks, Rt Hon Michael
Ewing, Harry (Stirling)
Hunter, Adam


Cohen, Stanley
Faulds, Andrew
Irvine, Rt Hon Sir A. (Edge Hill)


Coleman, Donald
Fernyhough, Rt Hon E.
Irving, Rt Hon S. (Dartford)







Jackson, Colin (Brighouse)
Miller, Mrs Millie (llford N)
Small, William


Jackson, Miss Margaret (Lincoln)
Morris, Alfred (Wythenshawe)
Smith, John (N Lanarkshire)


Janner, Greville
Morris, Charles R. (Openshaw)
Snape, Peter


Jay, Rt Hon Douglas
Morris, Rt Hon J. (Aberavon)
Spearing, Nigel


Jenkins, Hugh (Putney)
Moyle, Roland
Spriggs, Leslie


John, Brynmor
Mulley, Rt Hon Frederick
Stallard, A. W.


Johnson, James (Hull West)
Newens, Stanley
Stoddart, David


Jones, Alec (Rhondda)
Noble, Mike
Stott, Roger


Jones, Barry (East Flint)
Oakes, Gordon
Strang, Gavin


Jones, Dan (Burnley)
Ogden, Eric
Strauss, Rt Hon G. R.


Kaufman, Gerald
O'Halloran, Michael
Summerskill, Hon Dr Shirley


Kelley, Richard
Orbach, Maurice
Swain, Thomas


Kilroy-Silk, Robert
Orme, Rt Hon Stanley
Taylor, Mrs Ann (Bolton W)


Kinnock, Neil
Ovenden, John
Thomas, Dafydd (Merioneth)


Lambie, David
Owen, Rt Hon Dr David
Thomas, Jeffrey (Abertillery)


Lamborn, Harry
Padley, Walter
Thomas, Mike (Newcastle E)


Lamond, James
Palmer, Arthur
Thomas, Ron (Bristol NW)


Latham, Arthur (Paddington)
Park, George
Thompson, George


Leadbitter, Ted
Parker, John
Thorne, Stan (Preston South)


Lee, John
Parry, Robert
Tierney, Sydney


Lestor, Miss Joan (Eton &amp; Slough)
Pavitt, Laurie
Tinn, James


Lever, Rt Hon Harold
Pendry, Tom
Tomlinson, John


Lipton, Marcus
Perry, Ernest
Torney, Tom


Litterick, Tom
Phipps, Dr Colin
Urwin, T. W.


Lomas, Kenneth
Prentice, Rt Hon Reg
Varley, Rt Hon Eric G.


Loyden, Eddie
Price, C. (Lewisham W)
Walden, Brian (B'ham, L'dyw'd)


Luard, Evan
Price, William (Rugby)
Walker, Harold (Doncaster)


Lyon, Alexander (York)
Radice, Giles
Walker, Terry (Kingswood)


Lyons, Edward (Bradford W)
Rees, Rt Hon Merlyn (Leeds S)
Walkins, David


Mabon, Dr J Dickson
Richardson, Miss Jo
Walkinson, John


McCartney, Hugh
Roberts, Albert (Normanton)
Weetch, Ken


McDonald, Dr Oonagh
Roberts, Gwilym (Cannock)
Weitzman, David


McElhone, Frank
Robertson, John (Paisley)
Wellbeloved, James


McGuire, Michael (Ince)
Robinson, Geoffrey
While, Frank R. (Bury)


MacKenzie, Gregor
Roderick, Caerwyn
White, James (Pollok)


Mackintosh, John P.
Rodgers, George (Chorley)
Whitehead, Phillip


Maclennan, Robert
Rodgers, Rt Hon William (Stockton)
Whitlock, William


McMillan, Tom (Glasgow C)
Rooker, J. W.
Willey, Rt Hon Frederick


McNamara, Kevin
Roper, John
Williams, Alan (Swansea W)


Madden, Max
Rose, Paul B.
Williams, Rt Hon Shirley (Hertford)


Mahon, Simon
Ross, Rt Hon W. (Kilmarnock)
Williams, Sir Thomas (Warrington)


Mallalieu, J. P. W.
Rowlands, Ted
Wilson, Alexander (Hamilton)


Marks, Kenneth
Ryman, John
Wilson, Rt Hon Sir Harold (Huyton)


Marquand, David
Sandelson, Neville
Wilson, William (Coventry SE)


Marshall, Dr Edmund (Goole)
Sedgemore, Brian
Wise, Mrs Audrey


Marshall, Jim (Leicester S)
Selby, Harry
Woodall, Alec


Maynard, Miss Joan
Shaw, Arnold (llford South)
Woof, Robert


Meacher, Michael
Sheldon, Robert (Ashton-u-Lyne)
Wrigglesworth, Ian


Mellish, Rt Hon Robert
Short, Mrs Renée (Wolv NE)
Young, David (Bolton E)


Mendelson, John
Silkin, Rt Hon John (Deptford)



Mikardo, Ian
Sillars, James
TELLERS FOR THE AYES:


Millan, Rt Hon Bruce
Silverman, Julius
Mr, Ted Graham and


Miller, Dr M. S. (E Kilbride)
Skinner, Dennis
Mr. Joseph Ashton.




NOES


Adley, Robert
Bulmer, Esmond
Emery, Peter


Aitken, Jonathan
Burden, F. A.
Eyre, Reginald


Amery, Rt Hon Julian
Butler, Adam (Bosworth)
Fairbairn, Nicholas


Atkins, Rt Hon H. (Spelthorne)
Carson, John
Fairgrieve, Russell


Awdry, Daniel
Chalker, Mrs Lynda
Farr, John


Baker, Kenneth
Channon, Paul
Fell, Anthony


Banks, Robert
Churchill, W. S.
Finsberg, Geoffrey


Bell, Ronald
Clark, Alan (Plymouth, Sutton)
Fisher, Sir Nigel


Bennett, Sir Frederic (Torbay)
Clark, William (Craydon S)
Fletcher-Cooke, Charles


Bennett, Dr Reginald (Fareham)
Clarke, Kenneth (Rushcliffe)
Fookes, Miss Janet


Benyon, W.
Clegg, Walter
Forman, Nigel


Berry, Hon Anthony
Cockcroft, John
Fowler, Norman (Sutton C'f'd)


Biffen, John
Cooke, Robert (Bristol W)
Fox, Marcus


Biggs-Davison, John
Cope, John
Fraser, Rt Hon H. (Stafford &amp; St)


Blaker, Peter
Cordle, John H.
Fry, Peter


Body, Richard
Cormack, Patrick
Gardiner, George (Relgate)


Boscawen, Hon Robert
Corrie, John
Gardiner, Edward (S Fylde)


Bottomley, Peter
Costain, A. P.
Gilmour, Sir John (East Fife)


Bowden, A. (Brighton, Kemptown)
Craig, Rt Hon W. (Belfast E)
Glyn, Dr Alan


Boyson, Dr Rhodes (Brent)
Critchley, Julian
Godber, Rt Hon Joseph


Bradford, Rev Robert
Davies, Rt Hon J. (Knutsford)
Goodlad, Alastair


Braine, Sir Bernard
Dean, Paul (N Somerset)
Gorst, John


Brittan, Leon
Dodsworth, Geoffrey
Gow, Ian (Eastbourne)


Brocklebank-Fowler, C.
Douglas-Hamilton, Lord James
Gower, Sir Raymond (Barry)


Brotherton, Michael
Drayson, Burnaby
Gray, Hamish


Brown, Sir Edward (Bath)
du Cann, Rt Hon Edward
Grieve, Percy


Bryan, Sir Paul
Dunlop, John
Griffiths, Eldon


Buchanan-Smith, Alick
Eden, Rt Hon Sir John
Grimond, Rt Hon J.


Buck, Antony
Edwards, Nicholas (Pembroke)
Grist, Ian


Budgen, Nick
Elliott, Sir William
Grylls, Michael







Hall, Sir John
McNair-Wilson, P. (New Forest)
Ross, Stephen (Isle of Wight)


Hall-Davis, A. G. F.
Madel, David
Rossi, Hugh (Hornsey)


Hamilton, Michael (Salisbury)
Marten, Neil
Rost, Peter (SE Derbyshire)


Hampson, Dr Keith
Mates, Michael
Royle, Sir Anthony


Hannam, John
Maude, Angus
Sainsbury, Tim


Harvie Anderson, Rt Hon Miss
Maudling, Rt Hon Reginald
St. John-Stevas, Norman


Hastings, Stephen
Mawby, Ray
Scott, Nicholas


Havers, Sir Michael
Maxwell-Hyslop, Robin
Shaw, Giles (Pudsey)


Hawkins, Paul
Mayhew, Patrick
Shelton, William (Streatham)


Hayhoe, Barney
Meyer, Sir Anthony
Shepherd, Colin


Heath, Rt Hon Edward
Miller, Hal (Bromsgrove)
Shersby, Michael


Hicks, Robert
Mills, Peter
Silvester, Fred


Higgins, Terence L.
Miscampbell, Norman
Sims, Roger


Hodgson, Robin
Moate, Roger
Sinclair, Sir George


Holland, Philip
Molyneaux, James
Skeet, T. H. H.


Hordern, Peter
Monro, Hector
Smith, Dudley (Warwick)


Howe, Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey
Montgomery, Fergus
Speed, Keith


Howell, David (Guildford)
Moore, John (Croydon C)
Spence, John


Howells, Geraint (Cardigan)
More, Jasper (Ludlow)
Spicer, Michael (S Worcester)


Hunt, David (Wirral)
Morris, Michael (Northampton S)
Sproat, Iain


Hunt, John (Bromley)
Morrison, Charles (Devizes)
Stanbrook, Ivor


Hurd, Douglas
Morrison, Hon Peter (Chester)
Stanley, John


Hutchison, Michael Clark
Mudd, David
Steen, Anthony (Wavertree)


Irving, Charles (Cheltenham)
Neave, Airey
Stewart, Ian (Hitchin)


James, David
Nelson, Anthony
Stokes, John


Jenkin, Rt Hon P. (Wanst'd &amp; W'df'd)
Neubert, Michael
Stradling Thomas, J.


Jessel, Toby
Newton, Tony
Tapsell, Peter


Johnson Smith, G. (E Grinstead)
Nott, John
Taylor, R. (Croydon NW)


Johnston, Russell (Inverness)
Onslow, Cranley
Taylor, Teddy (Cathcart)


Jones, Arthur (Daventry)
Oppenheim, Mrs Sally
Tebbit, Norman


Jopling, Michael
Page, John (Harrow West)
Temple-Morris, Peter


Joseph, Rt Hon Sir Keith
Page, Rt Hon R. Graham (Crosby)
Thatcher, Rt Hon Margaret


Kaberry, Sir Donald
Page, Richard (Workington)
Thomas, Rt Hon P. (Hendon S)


Kershaw, Anthony
Paisley, Rev Ian
Thorpe, Rt Hon Jeremy (N Devon)


Kilfedder, James
Pardoe, John
Townsend, Cyril D.


Kimball, Marcus
Parkinson, Cecil
Trotter, Neville


King, Evelyn (South Dorset)
Pattie, Geoffrey
Tugendhat, Christopher


King, Tom (Bridgwater)
Penhaligon, David
van Straubenzee, W. R.


Kitson, Sir Timothy
Percival, Ian
Vaughan, Dr Gerard


Knox, David
Peyton, Rt Hon John
Viggers, Peter


Lamont, Norman
Pink, R. Bonner
Wakeham, John


Langford-Holt, Sir John
Powell, Rt Hon J. Enoch
Walder, David (Clitheroe)


Latham, Michael (Melton)
Price, David (Eastleigh)
Walker, Rt Hon P. (Worcester)


Lawrence, Ivan
Prior, Rt Hon James
Warren, Kenneth


Lawson, Nigel
Pym, Rt Hon Francis
Weatherill, Bernard


Le Marchant, Spencer
Raison, Timothy
Wells, John


Lewis, Kenneth (Rutland)
Rathbone, Tim
Whitelaw, Rt Hon William


Lloyd, Ian
Rees, Peter (Dover &amp; Deal)
Winterton, Nicholas


Loveridge, John
Rees-Davies, W. R.
Wood, Rt Hon Richard


McAdden, Sir Stephen
Renton, Rt Hon Sir D. (Hunts)
Young, Sir G. (Ealing, Acton)


McCrindle, Robert
Ridsdale, Julian
Younger, Hon George


McCusker, H.
Rifkind, Malcolm



Macfarlane, Neil
Rippon, Rt Hon Geoffrey
TELLERS FOR THE NOES:


MacGregor, John
Roberts, Michael (Cardiff NW)
Mrs. Carol Mather and


Macmillan, Rt Hon M. (Farnham)
Roberts, Wyn (Conway)
Mr. Jim Lester


McNair-Wilson, M. (Newbury)
Rodgers, Sir John (Sevenoaks)





Division List No. 426 [See c. 1746]


Division No. 426.]
AYES
[1.19 p.m.


Abse, Leo
Brown, Ronald (Hackney S)
Crosland, Rt Hon Anthony


Allaun, Frank
Buchan, Norman
Crowther, Stan (Rotherham)


Anderson, Donald
Buchanan, Richard
Cryer, Bob


Archer, Peter
Butler, Mrs Joyce (Wood Green)
Cunningham, G. (Islington S)


Armstrong, Ernest
Callaghan, Rt Hon J. (Cardiff SE)
Davidson, Arthur


Ashley, Jack
Callaghan, Jim (Middleton &amp; P)
Davies, Bryan (Enfield N)


Ashton, Joe
Campbell, Ian
Davies, Denzil (Llanelli)


Atkins, Ronald (Preston N)
Canavan, Dennis
Davies, Ifor (Gower)


Atkinson, Norman
Cant, R. B.
Davis, Clinton (Hackney C)


Bagler, Gordon A. T.
Carmichael, Neil
Deakins, Eric


Bain, Mrs Margaret
Carter, Ray
Dean, Joseph (Leeds West)


Barnett, Guy (Greenwich)
Carter-Jones, Lewis
Dell, Rt Hon Edmund


Barnett, Rt Hon Joel (Heywood)
Castle, Rt Hon Barbara
Dempsey, James


Bates, Alf
Clemitson, Ivor
Doig, Peter


Bean, R. E.
Cocks, Rt Hon Michael
Dormand, J. D.


Bidwell, Sydney
Cohen, Stanley
Douglas-Mann, Bruce


Bishop, E. S.
Coleman, Donald
Duffy, A. E. P.


Blenkinsop, Arthur
Colquhoun, Ms Maureen
Dunn, James A.


Boardman, H.
Concannon, J. D.
Dunnett, Jack


Booth, Rt Hon Albert
Conlan, Bernard
Eadie, Alex


Bottomley, Rt Hon Arthur
Cook, Robin F. (Edin C)
Edge, Geoff


Boyden, James (Bish Auck)
Corbett, Robin
Edwards, Robert (Wolv SE)


Bradley, Tom
Cowans, Harry
Ellis, John (Brigg &amp; Scun)


Bray, Dr Jeremy
Craigen, J. M. (Maryhill)
English, Michael


Brown, Hugh D. (Provan)
Crawshaw, Richard
Ennals, David


Brown, Robert C. (Newcastle W)
Cronin, John
Evans, Fred (Caerphilly)







Evans, Gwynfor (Carmarthen)
Lipton, Marcus
Rooker, J. W.


Evans, Ioan (Aberdare)
Litterick, Tom
Roper, John


Ewing, Harry (Stirling)
Lomas, Kenneth
Rose, Paul B.


Faulds, Andrew
Loyden, Eddie
Ross, Rt Hon W. (Kilmarnock)


Fernyhough, Rt Hon E.
Luard, Evan
Rowlands, Ted


Fitch, Alan (Wigan)
Lyon, Alexander (York)
Ryman, John


Fitt, Gerard (Belfast W)
Lyons, Edward (Bradford W)
Sandelson, Neville


Flannery, Martin
Mabon, Dr J Dickson
Sedgemore, Brian


Foot, Rt Hon Michael
McCartney, Hugh
Selby, Harry


Ford, Ben
McDonald, Dr Oonagh
Shaw, Arnold (Ilford South)


Forrester, John
McElhone, Frank
Sheldon, Robert (Ashton-u-Lyne)


Fowler, Gerald (The Wrekin)
McGuire, Michael (Ince)
Short, Mrs Renée (Wolv NE)


Fraser, John (Lambeth, N'w'd)
MacKenzie, Gregor
Silkin, Rt Hon John (Deptford)


Freeson, Reginald
Mackintosh, John P.
Sillars, James


Garrett, John (Norwich S)
Maclennan, Robert
Silverman, Julius


Garrett, W. E. (Wallsend)
McMillan, Tom (Glasgow C)
Skinner, Dennis


George, Bruce
McNamara, Kevin
Small, William


Gilbert, Dr John
Madden, Max
Smith, John (N Lanarkshire)


Ginsburg, David
Mahon, Simon
Spearing, Nigel


Golding, John
Mallalieu, J. P. W.
Spriggs, Leslie


Gould, Bryan
Marks, Kenneth
Stallard, A. W.


Gourlay, Harry
Marquand, David
Stoddart, David


Graham, Ted
Marshall, Dr Edmund (Goole)
Stott, Roger


Grant, George (Morpeth)
Marshall, Jim (Leicester S)
Strang, Gavin


Grant, John (Islington C)
Maynard, Miss Joan
Strauss, Rt Hon G. R


Grocott, Bruce
Meacher, Michael
Summerskill, Hon Dr Shirley


Hamilton, James (Bothwell)
Mellish, Rt Hon Robert
Swain, Thomas


Hardy, Peter
Mendelson, John
Taylor, Mrs Ann (Bolton W)


Harper, Joseph
Mikardo, Ian
Thomas, Dafydd (Merioneth)


Harrison, Walter (Wakefield)
Millan, Rt Hon Bruce
Thomas, Jeffrey (Abertillery)


Hart, Rt Hon Judith
Miller, Dr M. S. (E Kilbride)
Thomas, Mike (Newcastle E)


Hattersley, Rt Hon Roy
Miller, Mrs Millie (Ilford N)
Thomas, Ron (Bristol NW)


Hatton, Frank
Morris, Alfred (Wythenshawe)
Thompson, George


Hayman, Mrs Helene
Morris, Charles R. (Openshaw)
Thorne, Stan (Preston South)


Healey, Rt Hon Denis
Morris, Rt Hon J. (Aberavon)
Tierney, Sydney


Heffer, Eric S.
Moyle, Roland
Tinn, James


Hooley, Frank
Mulley, Rt Hon Frederick
Tomlinson, John


Horam, John
Newens, Stanley
Torney, Tom


Howell, Rt Hon Denis (B'ham, Sm H)
Noble, Mike
Urwin, T. W.


Hoyle, Doug (Nelson)
Oakes, Gordon
Varley, Rt Hon Eric G.


Huckfield, Les
Ogden, Eric
Walden, Brian (B'ham, L'dyw'd)


Hughes, Rt Hon C. (Anglesey)
O'Halloran, Michael
Walker, Harold (Doncaster)


Hughes, Robert (Aberdeen N)
Orbach, Maurice
Walker, Terry (Kingswood)


Hughes, Roy (Newport)
Orme, Rt Hon Stanley
Watkins, David


Hunter, Adam
Ovenden, John
Watkinson, John


Irvine, Rt Hon Sir A. (Edge Hill)
Owen, Rt Hon Dr David
Weetch, Ken


Irving, Rt Hon S. (Dartford)
Padley, Walter
Weitzman, David


Jackson, Colin (Brighouse)
Palmer, Arthur
Wellbeloved, James


Jackson, Miss Margaret (Lincoln)
Park, George
White, Frank R. (Bury)


Janner, Greville
Parker, John
White, James (Pollok)


Jay, Rt Hon Douglas
Parry, Robert
Whitehead, Phillip


Jenkins, Hugh (Putney)
Pavitt, Laurie
Whitlock, William


John, Brynmor
Pendry, Tom
Willey, Rt Hon Frederick


Johnson, James (Hull West)
Perry, Ernest
Williams, Alan (Swansea W)


Jones, Alec (Rhondda)
Phipps, Dr Colin
Williams, Rt Hon Shirley (Hertford)


Jones, Barry (East Flint)
Prentice, Rt Hon Reg
Williams, Sir Thomas (Warrington)


Jones, Dan (Burnley)
Price, C. (Lewisham W)
Wilson, Alexander (Hamilton)


Kaufman, Gerald
Price, William (Rugby)
Wilson, Rt Hon Sir Harold (Huyton)


Kelley, Richard
Radice, Giles
Wilson, William (Coventry SE)


Kilroy-Silk, Robert
Rees, Rt Hon Merlyn (Leeds S)
Wise, Mrs Audrey


Kinnock, Neil
Richardson, Miss Jo
Woodall, Alec


Lambie, David
Roberts, Albert (Normanton)
Woof, Robert


Lamborn, Harry
Roberts, Gwilym (Cannock)
Wrigglesworth, Ian


Lamond, James
Robertson, John (Paisley)
Young, David (Bolton E)


Latham, Arthur (Paddington)
Robinson, Geoffrey



Leadbitter, Ted
Roderick, Caerwyn
TELLERS FOR THE AYES:


Lee, John
Rodgers, George (Chorley)
Mr. Peter Snape and


Lestor, Miss Joan (Eton &amp; Slough)
Rodgers, Rt Hon William (Stockton)
Mr. Thomas Cox.


Lever, Rt Hon Harold






NOES


Adley, Robert
Body, Richard
Bulmer, Esmond


Aitken, Jonathan
Boscawen, Hon Robert
Burden, F. A.


Amery, Rt Hon Julian
Bottomley, Peter
Butler, Adam (Bosworth)


Atkins, Rt Hon H. (Spelthorne)
Bowden, A. (Brighton, Kemptown)
Chalker, Mrs Lynda


Awdry, Daniel
Boyson, Dr Rhodes (Brent)
Channon, Paul


Baker, Kenneth
Braine, Sir Bernard
Churchill, W. S.


Banks, Robert
Brittan, Leon
Clark, Alan (Plymouth, Sutton)


Bell, Ronald
Brocklebank-Fowler, C.
Clark, William (Croydon S)


Bennett, Sir Frederic (Torbay)
Brotherton, Michael
Clarke, Kenneth (Rushcliffe)


Bennett, Dr Reginald (Fareham)
Brown, Sir Edward (Bath)
Clegg, Walter


Benyon, W.
Bryan, Sir Paul
Cockcroft, John


Biffen, John
Buchanan-Smith, Alick
Cooke, Robert (Bristol W)


Biggs-Davison, John
Buck, Antony
Cope, John


Blaker, Peter
Budgen, Nick
Cordle, John H.







Cormack, Patrick
Jenkin, Rt Hon P. (Wanst'd &amp; W'df'd)
Powell, Rt Hon J. Enoch


Corrie, John
Jessel, Toby
Price, David (Eastleigh)


Costain, A. P.
Johnson Smith, G. (E Grinstead)
Prior, Rt Hon James


Craig, Rt Hon W. (Belfast E)
Johnston, Russell (Inverness)
Pym, Rt Hon Francis


Critchley, Julian
Jones, Arthur (Daventry)
Raison, Timothy


Crowder, F. P.
Jopling, Michael
Rathbone, Tim


Davies, Rt Hon J. (Knutsford)
Joseph, Rt Hon Sir Keith
Rees, Peter (Dover &amp; Deal)


Dean, Paul (N Somerset)
Kaberry, Sir Donald
Rees-Davies, W. R.


Dodsworth, Geoffrey
Kershaw, Anthony
Renton, Rt Hon Sir D. (Hunts)


Douglas-Hamilton, Lord James
Kilfedder, James
Ridsdale, Julian


Drayson, Burnaby
Kimball, Marcus
Rifkind, Malcolm


Eden, Rt Hon Sir John
King, Evelyn (South Dorset)
Rippon, Rt Hon Geoffrey


Edwards, Nicholas (Pembroke)
King, Tom (Bridgwater)
Roberts, Michael (Cardiff NW)


Elliott, Sir William
Kitson, Sir Timothy
Roberts, Wyn (Conway)


Emery, Peter
Knox, David
Rodgers, Sir John (Sevenoaks)


Eyre, Reginald
Lamont, Norman
Ross, Stephen (Isle of Wight)


Fairbairn, Nicholas
Langford-Holt, Sir John
Rossi, Hugh (Hornsey)


Fairgrieve, Russell
Latham, Michael (Melton)
Rost, Peter (SE Derbyshire)


Fair, John
Lawrence, Ivan
Royle, Sir Anthony


Fell, Anthony
Lawson, Nigel
Sainsbury, Tim


Finsberg, Geoffrey
Lester, Jim (Beeston)
St. John-Stevas, Norman


Fisher, Sir Nigel
Lewis, Kenneth (Rutland)
Scott, Nicholas


Fletcher-Cooke, Charles
Lloyd, Ian
Shaw, Giles (Pudsey)


Fookes, Miss Janet
Loveridge, John
Shelton, William (Streatham)


Forman, Nigel
McAdden, Sir Stephen
Shepherd, Colin


Fowler, Norman (Sutton C'f'd)
McCrindle, Robert
Shersby, Michael


Fox, Marcus
Macfarlane, Neil
Silvester, Fred


Fraser, Rt Hon H. (Stafford &amp; St)
MacGregor, John
Sims, Roger


Fry, Peter
Macmillan, Rt Hon M. (Farnham)
Sinclair, Sir George


Galbraith, Hon. T. G. D.
McNair-Wilson, M. (Newbury)
Skeet, T. H. H.


Gardiner, George (Reigate)
McNair-Wilson, P. (New Forest)
Smith, Dudley (Warwick)


Gardner, Edward (S. Fylde)
Madel, David
Speed, Keith


Gilmour, Sir John (East Fife)
Marten, Neil
Spence, John


Glyn, Dr Alan
Mates, Michael
Spicer, Michael (S Worcester)


Godber, Rt Hon Joseph
Mather, Carol
Sproat, Iain


Goodlad, Alastair
Maude, Angus
Stanbrook, Ivor


Gorst, John
Maudling, Rt Hon Reginald
Stanley, John


Gow, Ian (Eastbourne)
Mawby, Ray
Steen, Anthony (Wavertree)


Gower, Sir Raymond (Barry)
Maxwell-Hyslop, Robin
Stewart, Ian (Hitchin)


Gray, Hamish
Mayhew, Patrick
Stokes, John


Grieve, Percy
Meyer, Sir Anthony
Stradling Thomas, J.


Griffiths, Eldon
Miller, Hal (Bromsgrove)
Tapsell, Peter


Grimond, Rt Hon J.
Mills, Peter
Taylor, R. (Croydon NW)


Grist, Ian
Miscampbell, Norman
Taylor, Teddy (Cathcart)


Grylls, Michael
Moate, Roger
Tebbit, Norman


Hall, Sir John
Monro, Hector
Temple-Morris, Peter


Hall-Davis, A. G. F.
Montgomery, Fergus
Thatcher, Rt Hon Margaret


Hamilton, Michael (Salisbury)
Moore, John (Croydon C)
Thomas, Rt Hon P. (Hendon S)


Hampson, Dr Keith
More, Jasper (Ludlow)
Thorpe, Rt Hon Jeremy (N Devon)


Hannam, John
Morris, Michael (Northampton S)
Townsend, Cyril D.


Harvie Anderson, Rt Hon Miss
Morrison, Charles (Devizes)
Trotter, Neville


Hastings, Stephen
Morrison, Hon Peter (Chester)
Tugendhat, Christopher


Havers, Sir Michael
Mudd, David
van Straubenzee, W. R.


Hawkins, Paul
Neave, Airey
Vaughan, Dr Gerard


Hayhoe, Barney
Nelson, Anthony
Viggers, Peter


Heath, Rt Hon Edward
Neubert, Michael
Wakeham, John


Hicks, Robert
Newton, Tony
Walker, Rt Hon P. (Worcester)


Higgins, Terence L.
Nott, John
Warren, Kenneth


Hodgson, Robin
Onslow, Cranley
Weatherill, Bernard


Holland, Philip
Oppenheim, Mrs Sally
Wells, John


Hordern, Peter
Page, John (Harrow West)
Whitelaw, Rt Hon William


Howe, Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey
Page, Rt Hon R. Graham (Crosby)
Winterton, Nicholas


Howell, David (Guildford)
Page, Richard (Workington)
Wood, Rt Hon Richard


Howells, Geraint (Cardigan)
Pardoe, John
Young, Sir G. (Ealing, Acton)


Hunt, David (Wirral)
Parkinson, Cecil
Younger, Hon George


Hunt, John (Bromley)
Pattie, Geoffrey



Hurd, Douglas
Penhaligon, David
TELLERS FOR THE NOES:


Hutchison, Michael Clark
Percival, Ian
Mr. Spencer Le Marchant and


Irving, Charles (Cheltenham)
Peyton, Rt Hon John
Mr. Anthony Berry.


James, David
Pink, R. Bonner





Division List No. 427 [See c. 1751]


Division No. 427.]
AYES
[1.47 p.m.


Abse, Leo
Barnett, Rt Hon Joel (Heywood)
Brown, Hugh D. (Provan)


Allaun, Frank
Bates, Alf
Brown, Robert C. (Newcastle W)


Anderson, Donald
Bean, R. E.
Brown, Ronald (Hackney S)


Archer, Peter
Bidwell, Sydney
Buchan, Norman


Armstrong, Ernest
Bishop, E. S.
Buchanan, Richard


Ashley, Jack
Blenkinsop, Arthur
Butler, Mrs Joyce (Wood Green)


Ashton, Joe
Boardman, H.
Callaghan, Rt Hon J. (Cardiff SE)


Atkins, Ronald (Preston N)
Booth, Rt Hon Albert
Callaghan, Jim (Middleton &amp; P)


Atkinson, Norman
Bottomley, Rt Hon Arthur
Campbell, Ian


Bagier, Gordon A. T.
Boyden, James (Bish Auck)
Canavan, Dennis


Bain, Mrs Margaret
Bradley, Tom
Cant, R. B.


Barnett, Guy (Greenwich)
Bray, Dr Jeremy
Carmichael, Neil







Carter, Ray
Hughes, Roy (Newport)
Price, C. (Lewisham W)


Carter-Jones, Lewis
Hunter, Adam
Price, William (Rugby)


Castle, Rt Hon Barbara
Irvine, Rt Hon Sir A. (Edge Hill)
Radice, Giles


Clemitson, Ivor
Irving, Rt Hon S. (Dartford)
Rees, Rt Hon Merlyn (Leeds S)


Cocks, Rt Hon Michael
Jackson, Colin (Brighouse)
Richardson, Miss Jo


Cohen, Stanley
Jackson, Miss Margaret (Lincoln)
Roberts, Albert (Normanton)


Colquhoun, Ms Maureen
Janner, Greville
Roberts, Gwilym (Cannock)


Concannon, J. D.
Jay, Rt Hon Douglas
Robertson, John (Paisley)


Conlan, Bernard
Jenkins, Hugh (Putney)
Robinson, Geoffrey


Cook, Robin F. (Edin C)
John, Brynmor
Roderick, Caerwyn


Corbett, Robin
Johnson, James (Hull West)
Rodgers, George (Chorley)


Cowans, Harry
Jones, Alec (Rhondda)
Rodgers, Rt Hon William (Stockton)


Cox, Thomas (Tooling)
Jones, Barry (East Flint)
Rooker, J. W.


Craigen, J. M. (Maryhill)
Jones, Dan (Burnley)
Roper, John


Crawshaw, Richard
Kaufman, Gerald
Rose, Paul B.


Cronin, John
Kelley, Richard
Ross, Rt Hon W. (Kilmarnock)


Cropland, Rt Hon Anthony
Kilroy-Silk, Robert
Rowlands, Ted


Crowther, Stan (Rotherham)
Kinnock, Neil
Ryman, John


Cryer, Bob
Lambie, David
Sandelson, Neville


Cunningham, G. (Islington S)
Lamborn, Harry
Sedgemore, Brian


Davidson, Arthur
Lamond, James
Selby, Harry


Davies, Bryan (Enfield N)
Latham, Arthur (Paddington)
Shaw, Arnold (Ilford South)


Davies, Denzil (Llaneill)
Leadbitter, Ted
Sheldon, Robert (Ashton-u-Lyne)


Davies, Ifor (Gower)
Lee, John
Short, Mrs Renée (Wolv NE)


Davis, Clinton (Hackney C)
Lestor, Miss Joan (Eton &amp; Slough)
Silkin, Rt Hon John (Deptford)


Deakins, Eric
Lever, Rt Hon Harold
Sillars, James


Dean, Joseph (Leeds West)
Lipton, Marcus
Silverman, Julius


Dell, Rt Hon Edmund
Litterick, Tom
Skinner, Dennis


Dempsey, James
Lomas, Kenneth
Small, William


Doig, Peter
Loyden, Eddie
Smith, John (N Lanarkshire)


Dormand, J. D.
Luard, Evan
Snape, Peter


Douglas-Mann, Bruce
Lyon, Alexander (York)
Spearing, Nigel


Duffy, A. E. P.
Lyons, Edward (Bradford W)
Spriggs, Leslie


Dunn, James A.
Mabon, Dr J Dickson
Stallard, A. W.


Dunnett, Jack
McCartney, Hugh
Stoddart, David


Eadie, Alex
McDonald, Dr Oonagh
Stott, Roger


Edge, Geoff
McElhone, Frank
Strang, Gavin


Edwards, Robert (Wolv SE)
McGuire. Michael (Ince)
Strauss, Rt Hon G. R.


Ellis, John (Brigg &amp; Scun)
MacKenzie, Gregor
Summerskill. Hon Dr Shirley


English, Michael
Mackintosh, John P.
Swain, Thomas


Ennals, David
Maclennan, Robert
Taylor, Mrs Ann (Bolton W)


Evans, Fred (Caerphilly)
McMillan, Tom (Glasgow C)
Thomas, Dafydd (Merioneth)


Evans, Ioan (Aberdare)
McNamara, Kevin
Thomas, Jeffrey (Abertillery)


Ewing, Harry (Stirling)
Madden, Max
Thomas, Mike (Newcastle E)


Faulds, Andrew
Mahon, Simon
Thomas, Ron (Bristol NW)


Fernyhough, Rt Hon E.
Mallalieu, J. P. W.
Thompson, George


Fitch, Alan (Wigan)
Marks, Kenneth
Thorne, Stan (Preston South)


Fitt, Gerard (Belfast W)
Marquand, David
Tierney, Sydney


Flannery, Martin
Marshall, Dr Edmund (Goole)
Tinn, James


Foot, Rt Hon Michael
Marshall, Jim (Leicester S)
Tomlinson, John


Ford, Ben
Maynard, Miss Joan
Torney, Tom


Forrester, John
Meacher, Michael
Urwin, T. W.


Fowler, Gerald (The Wrekin)
Mellish, Rt Hon Robert
Varley, Rt Hon Eric G.


Fraser, John (Lambeth, N'w'd)
Mendelson, John
Walden, Brian (B'ham, L'dyw'd)


Freeson, Reginald
Mikardo, Ian
Walker, Harold (Doncaster)


Garrett, John (Norwich S)
Millan, Rt Hon Bruce
Walker, Terry (Kingswood)


Garrett, W. E. (Wallsend)
Miller, Dr M. S. (E Kilbride)
Watkins, David


George, Bruce
Miller, Mrs Millie (Ilford N)
Watkinson, John


Gilbert, Dr John
Morris, Alfred (Wythenshawe)
Weetch, Ken


Ginsburg, David
Morris, Charles R. (Openshaw)
Weitzman, David


Golding, John
Morris, Rt Hon J. (Aberavon)
Wellbeloved, James


Gould, Bryan
Moyle, Roland
White, Frank R. (Bury)


Graham, Ted
Mulley, Rt Hon Frederick
White, James (Pollok)


Grant, George (Morpeth)
Newens, Stanley
Whitehead, Phillip


Grant, John (Islington C)
Noble, Mike
Whitlock, William


Grocott, Bruce
Oakes, Gordon
Willey, Rt Hon Frederick


Hardy, Peter
Ogden, Eric
Williams, Alan (Swansea W)


Harper, Joseph
O'Halloran, Michael
Williams, Rt Hon Shirley (Hertford)


Harrison, Walter (Wakefield)
Orbach, Maurice
Williams, Sir Thomas (Warrington)


Hart, Rt Hon Judith
Orme, Rt Hon Stanley
Wilson, Alexander (Hamilton)


Hattersley, Rt Hon Roy
Ovenden, John
Wilson, Rt Hon Sir Harold (Huyton.)


Hatton, Frank
Owen, Rt Hon Dr David
Wilson, William (Coventry SE)


Hayman, Mrs Helane
Padley, Walter
Wise, Mrs Audrey


Healey, Rt Hon Denis
Palmer, Arthur
Woodall, Alec


Heffer, Eric S.
Park, George
Woof, Robert


Hooley, Frank
Parker, John
Wrigglesworth, Ian


Horam, John
Parry, Robert
Young, David (Bolton E)


Howell, Rt Hon Denis (B'ham, Sm H)
Pavitt, Laurie



Hoyle, Doug (Nelson)
Pendry, Tom
TELLERS FOR THE AYES:


Huckfield, Les
Perry, Ernest
Mr.James Hamilton and


Hughes, Rt Hon C. (Anglesey)
Phipps, Dr Colin
Mr. Donald Coleman


Hughes, Robert (Aberdeen N)
Prentice, Rt Hon Reg








NOES


Adley, Robert
Gorst, John
Moore, John (Croydon C)


Aitken, Jonathan
Gow, Ian (Eastbourne)
More, Jasper (Ludlow)


Amery, Rt Hon Julian
Gower, Sir Raymond (Barry)
Morris, Michael (Northampton S)


Atkins, Rt Hon H. (Spelthorne)
Gray, Hamish
Morrison, Charles (Devizes)


Awdry, Daniel
Grieve, Percy
Morrison, Hon Peter (Chester)


Baker, Kenneth
Griffiths, Eldon
Mudd, David


Banks, Robert
Grimond, Rt Hon J.
Neave, Airey


Bell, Ronald
Grist, Ian
Nelson, Anthony


Bennett, Sir Frederic (Torbay)
Grylls, Michael
Neubert, Michael


Bennett, Dr Reginald (Fareham)
Hall, Sir John
Newton, Tony


Benyon, W.
Hall-Davis, A. G. F.
Nott, John


Berry, Hon Anthony
Hamilton, Michael (Salisbury)
Onslow, Cranley


Bitten, John
Hampson, Dr Keith
Oppenheim, Mrs Sally


Biggs-Davison, John
Hannam, John
Page, John (Harrow West)


Blaker, Peter
Harvie Anderson, Rt Hon Miss
Page, Rt Hon R. Graham (Crosby)


Body, Richard
Hastings, Stephen
Page, Richard (Workington)


Boscawen, Hon Robert
Havers, Sir Michael
Paisley, Rev Ian


Bottomley, Peter
Hawkins, Paul
Pardoe, John


Bowden, A. (Brighton, Kemptown)
Hayhoe, Barney
Parkinson, Cecil


B Dyson, Dr Rhodes (Brent)
Heath, Rt Hon Edward
Pattie, Geoffrey


Bradford, Rev Robert
Hicks, Robert
Penhaligon, David


Braine, Sir Bernard
Higgins, Terence L.
Percival, Ian


Brittan, Leon
Hodgson, Robin
Peyton. Rt Hon John


Brocklebank-Fowler, C.
Holland. Philip
Pink, R. Bonner


Brotherton, Michael
Hordern, Peter
Powell, Rt Hon J. Enoch


Brown, Sir Edward (Bath)
Howe, Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey
Price, David (Eastleigh)


Bryan, Sir Paul
Howell, David (Guildford)
Prior, Rt Hon James


Buchanan-Smith, Alick
Howells, Geraint (Cardigan)
Pym, Rt Hon Francis


Buck, Antony
Hunt, David (Wirral)
Raison, Timothy


Budgen, Nick
Hunt, John (Bromley)
Rathbone, Tim


Bulmer, Esmond
Hurd, Douglas
Rees. Peter (Dover &amp; Deal)


Burden, F. A.
Hutchison, Michael Clark
Rees-Davies, W. R.


Butler, Adam (Bosworth)
Irving, Charles (Cheltenham)
Renton, Rt Hon Sir D. (Hunts)


Carlisle, Mark
James, David
Ridsdale, Julian


Carson, John
Jenkin, Rt Hon P. (Wanst'd &amp; W'df'd)
Rifkind, Malcolm


Chalker, Mrs Lynda
Jessel, Toby
Rippon, Rt Hon Geoffrey


Channon, Paul
Johnson Smith, G. (E Grinstead)
Roberts, Wyn (Conway)


Churchill, W. S.
Johnston, Russell (Inverness)
Rodgers, Sir John (Sevenoaks)


Clark, Alan (Plymouth, Sutton)
Jones, Arthur (Daventry)
Ross, Stephen (Isle of Wight)


Clark, William (Croydon S)
Jopling, Michael
Rossi, Hugh (Hornsey)


Clarke, Kenneth (Rushcliffe)
Joseph, Rt Hon Sir Keith
Rost, Peter (SE Derbyshire)


Clegg, Walter
Kaberry, Sir Donald
Royle, Sir Anthony


Cockcroft, John
Kershaw, Anthony
Sainsbury, Tim


Cooke, Robert (Bristol W)
Kilfedder, James
St. John-Stevas, Norman


Cope, John
Kimball, Marcus
Scott, Nicholas


Cordle, John H.
King, Evelyn (South Dorset)
Shaw, Giles (Pudsey)


Cormack, Patrick
King, Tom (Bridgwater)
Shelton, William (Streatham)


Corrie, John
Kitson, Sir Timothy
Shepherd, Colin


Costain, A. P.
Knox, David
Shersby, Michael


Craig, Rt Hon W. (Belfast E)
Lamont, Norman
Silvester, Fred


Critchley, Julian
Langford-Holt, Sir John
Sims, Roger


Crowder, F. P.
Latham, Michael (Melton)
Sinclair, Sir George


Davies, Rt Hon J. (Knutsford)
Lawrence, Ivan
Skeet, T. H. H.


Dean, Paul (N Somerset)
Lawson, Nigel
Smith, Dudley (Warwick)


Dodsworth, Geoffrey
Lester, Jim (Beeston)
Speed, Keith


Douglas-Hamilton, Lord James
Lewis, Kenneth (Rutland)
Spence, John


Drayson, Burnaby
Lloyd, Ian
Spicer, Michael (S Worcester)


Dunlop, John
Loveridge, John
Sproat, Iain


Eden, Rt Hon Sir John
McAdden, Sir Stephen
Stanbrook, Ivor


Edwards, Nicholas (Pembroke)
McCrindle, Robert
Stanley, John


Elliott, Sir William
McCusker, H.
Steen, Anthony (Wavertree)


Emery, Peter
Macfarlane, Neil
Stewart, Ian (Hitchin)


Eyre, Reginald
MacGregor, John
Stokes, John


Fairbairn, Nicholas
Macmillan, Rt Hon M. (Farnham)
Tapsell, Peter


Fairgrieve, Russell
McNair-Wilson, M. (Newbury)
Taylor, R. (Croydon NW)


Farr, John
McNair-Wilson, P. (New Forest)
Taylor, Teddy (Cathcart)


Fell, Anthony
Madel, David
Tebbit, Norman


Finsberg, Geoffrey
Marten, Neil
Temple-Morris, Peter


Fisher, Sir Nigel
Mates, Michael
Thatcher, Rt Hon Margaret


Fletcher-Cooke, Charles
Mather, Carol
Thomas. Rt Hon P. (Hendon S)


Fookes, Miss Janet
Maude, Angus
Thorpe, Rt Hon Jeremy (N Devon)


Forman, Nigel
Maudling. Rt Hon Reginald
Townsend, Cyril D.


Fowler, Norman (Sutton C'f'd)
Mawby, Ray
Trotter. Neville


Fox, Marcus
Maxwell-Hyslop, Robin
Tugendhat, Christopher


Fraser, Rt Hon K. (Stafford &amp; St)
Mayhew, Patrick
van Straubenzee, W. R.


Fry, Peter
Meyer, Sir Anthony
Vaughan, Dr Gerard


Galbraith, Hon. T. G. D.
Miller. Hal (Bromsgrove)
Viggers, Peter


Gardiner, George (Reigate)
Mills, Peter
Wakeham, John


Gardiner, Edward (S Fylde)
Miscampbell, Norman
Walder, David (Clitheroe)


Gilmour, Sir John (East Fife)
Moate, Roger
Walker, Rt Hon P. (Worcester)


Glyn, Dr Alan
Molyneaux, James
Warren, Kenneth


Godber, Rt Hon Joseph
Monro, Hector
Weatherill, Bernard


Goodlad, Alastair
Montgomery, Fergus
Wells, John







Whitelaw, Rt Hon William
Young, Sir G. (Ealing, Acton)
TELLERS FOR THE NOES:


Winterton, Nicholas
Younger, Hon George
Mr. Spencer Le Marchant and


Wood, Rt Hon Richard

Mr. Michael Roberts




Division List No. 428 [See c. 1764]


Division No. 428.]
AYES
[2.39 p.m.


Abse, Leo
Ewing, Harry (Stirling)
McGuire, Michael (Ince)


Allaun, Frank
Faulds, Andrew
MacKenzie, Gregor


Anderson, Donald
Fernyhough, Rt Hon E.
Mackintosh, John P.


Archer, Peter
Fitch, Alan (Wigan)
Maclennan, Robert


Armstrong, Ernest
Fitt, Gerard (Belfast W)
McMillan, Tom (Glasgow C)


Ashley, Jack
Flannery, Martin
McNamara, Kevin


Ashton, Joe
Foot, Rt Hon Michael
Madden, Max


Atkins, Ronald (Preston N)
Ford, Ben
Mahon, Simon


Atkinson, Norman
Forrester, John
Mallalieu, J. P. W.


Bagler, Gordon A. T.
Fowler, Gerald (The Wrekin)
Marks, Kenneth


Bain, Mrs Margaret
Fraser, John (Lambeth, N'w'd)
Marquand, David


Barnett, Guy (Greenwich)
Freeson, Reginald
Marshall, Dr Edmund (Goole)


Barnett, Rt Hon Joel (Heywood)
Garrett, John (Norwich S)
Marshall, Jim (Leicester S)


Bates, Alf
Garrett, W. E. (Wallsend)
Maynard, Miss Joan


Bean, R. E.
George, Bruce
Meacher, Michael


Bidwell, Sydney
Gilbert, Dr John
Mellish, Rt Hon Robert


Bishop, E. S.
Ginsburg, David
Mendelson, John


Blenkinsop, Arthur
Golding, John
Mikardo, Ian


Boardman, H.
Gould, Bryan
Millan, Rt Hon Bruce


Booth, Rt Hon Albert
Gourlay, Harry
Miller, Dr M. S. (E Kilbride)


Bottomley, Rt Hon Arthur
Graham, Ted
Miller, Mrs Millie (Ilford N)


Boyden, James (Bish Auck)
Grant, George (Morpeth)
Morris, Alfred (Wythenshawe)


Bradley, Tom
Grant, John (Islington C)
Morris, Charles R. (Openshaw)


Bray, Dr Jeremy
Grimond, Rt Hon J.
Morris, Rt Hon J. (Aberavon)


Brown, Hugh D. (Provan)
Grocott, Bruce
Moyle, Roland


Brown, Robert C. (Newcastle W)
Hamilton, James (Sothwell)
Mulley, Rt Hon Frederick


Brown, Ronald (Hackney S)
Hardy, Peter
Newens, Stanley


Buchan, Norman
Harrison, Walter (Wakefield)
Noble, Mike


Buchanan, Richard
Hart, Rt Hon Judith
Oakes, Gordon


Butler, Mrs Joyce (Wood Green)
Hattersley, Rt Hon Roy
Ogden, Eric


Callaghan, Rt Hon J. (Cardiff SE)
Hatton, Frank
O' Halloran, Michael


Callaghan, Jim (Middleton &amp; P)
Hayman, Mrs Helene
Orbach, Maurice


Campbell, Ian
Healey, Rt Hon Denis
Orme, Rt Hon Stanley


Canavan, Dennis
Heffer, Eric S.
Ovenden, John


Cant, R. B.
Hooley, Frank
Owen, Rt Hon Dr David


Carmichael, Nell
Horam, John
Padley, Walter


Carter, Ray
Howell, Rt Hon Denis (B'ham, Sm H)
Palmer, Arthur


Carter-Jones, Lewis
Howells, Geraint (Cardigan)
Pardoe, John


Castle, Rt Hon Barbara
Hoyle, Doug (Nelson)
Park, George


Clemitson, Ivor
Huckfield, Les
Parker, John


Cocks, Rt Hon Michael
Hughes, Rt Hon C. (Anglesey)
Parry, Robert


Cohen, Stanley
Hughes, Robert (Aberdeen N)
Pavitt, Laurie


Coleman, Donald
Hughes, Roy (Newport)
Pendry, Tom


Colquhoun, Ms Maureen
Hunter, Adam
Penhaligon, David


Concannon, J. D.
Irvine, Rt Hon Sir A. (Edge Hill)
Perry, Ernest


Conian, Bernard
Irving, Rt Hon S. (Dartford)
Phipps, Dr Colin


Cook, Robin F. (Edin C)
Jackson, Colin (Brighouse)
Prentice, Rt Hon Reg


Corbett, Robin
Jackson, Miss Margaret (Lincoln)
Price, C. (Lewisham W)


Cowans, Harry
Janner, Greville
Price, William (Rugby)


Cox, Thomas (Tooting)
Jay, Rt Hon Douglas
Radice, Giles


Craigen, J. M. (Maryhill)
Jenkins, Hugh (Putney)
Rees, Rt Hon Merlyn (Leeds S)


Crawshaw, Richard
John, Brynmor
Richardson, Miss Jo


Cronin, John
Johnson, James (Hull West)
Roberts, Albert (Normanton)


Cropland, Rt Hon Anthony
Jones, Alec (Rhondda)
Roberts, Gwilym (Cannock)


Crowther, Stan (Rotherham)
Jones, Barry (East Flint)
Robertson, John (Paisley)


Cryer, Bob
Jones, Dan (Burnley)
Robinson, Geoffrey


Cunningham, G. (Islington S)
Kaufman, Gerald
Roderick, Caerwyn


Davidson, Arthur
Kelley, Richard
Rodgers, George (Chorley)


Davies, Bryan (Enfield N)
Kilroy-Silk, Robert
Rodgers, Rt Hon William (Stockton)


Davies, Denzil (Llanelli)
Kinnock, Nell
Rooker, J. W.


Davies, Ifor (Gower)
Lambie, David
Roper, John


Deakins, Eric
Lamborn, Harry
Rose, Paul B.


Dean, Joseph (Leeds West)
Lamond, James
Rose, Stephen (Isle of Wight)


Dell, Rt Hon Edmund
Latham, Arthur (Paddington)
Ross, Rt Hon W. (Kilmarnock)


Dempsey, James
Leadbitter, Ted
Rowlands, Ted


Doig, Peter
Lee, John
Ryman, John


Dormand, J. D.
Lestor, Miss Joan (Eton &amp; Slough)
Sandelson, Neville


Douglas-Mann, Bruce
Lever, Rt Hon Harold
Sedgemore, Brian


Duffy, A. E. P.
Lipton, Marcus
Selby, Harry


Dunn, James A.
Litterick, Tom
Shaw, Arnold (Ilford South)


Dunnett, Jack
Lomas, Kenneth
Sheldon, Robert (Ashton-u-Lynne)


Eadie, Alex
Loyden, Eddie
Short, Mrs Renée (Wolv NE)


Edge, Geoff
Luard, Evan
Silkin, Rt Hon John (Deptford)


Edwards, Robert (Wolv SE)
Lyon, Alexander (York)
Sillars, James


Ellis, John (Brigg &amp; Scun)
Lyons, Edward (Bradford W)
Silverman, Julius


English, Michael
Mabon, Dr J Dickson
Skinner, Dennis


Ennals, David
McCartney, Hugh
Small, William


Evans, Fred (Caerphilly)
McDonald, Dr Oonagh
Smith, John (N Lanarkshire)


Evans, Ioan (Aberdare)
McElhone, Frank
Spearing, Nigel

Spriggs, Leslie
Tinn, James
Willey, Rt Hon Frederick


Stallard, A. W.
Tomlinson, John
Williams, Alan (Swansea W)


Stoddart, David
Torney, Tom
Williams, Rt Hon Shirley (Hertford)


Stott, Roger
Urwin, T. W.
Williams, Sir Thomas (Warrington)


Strang, Gavin
Varley, Rt Hon Eric G.
Wilson, Alexander (Hamilton)


Strauss, Rt Hon G. R.
Walden, Brian (B'ham, L'dyw'd)
Wilson, Rt Hon Sir Harold (Huyton)


Summerskill, Hon Dr Shirley
Walker, Harold (Doncaster)
Wilson, William (Coventry SE)


Swain, Thomas
Walker, Terry (Kingswood)
Wise, Mrs Audrey


Taylor, Mrs Ann (Bolton W)
Watkins, David
Woodall, Alec


Thomas, Dafydd (Merioneth)
Watkinson, John
Woof, Robert


Thomas, Jeffrey (Abertillery)
Weetch, Ken
Wrigglesworth, Ian


Thomas, Mike (Newcastle E)
Weitzman, David
Young, David (Bolton E)


Thomas, Ron (Bristol NW)
Wellbeloved, James



Thompson, George
White, Frank R. (Bury)
TELLERS FOR THE AYES:


Thorne, Stan (Preston South)
White, James (Pollok)
Mr. Peter Snape and


Thorpe, Rt Hon Jeremy (N Devon)
Whitehead, Phillip
Mr. Joseph Harper.


Tierney, Sydney
Whitlock, William





NOES


Adley, Robert
Fell, Anthony
Lawrence, Ivan


Aitken, Jonathan
Finsberg, Geoffrey
Lawson, Nigel


Amery, Rt Hon Julian
Fisher, Sir Nigel
Le Marchant, Spencer


Atkins, Rt Hon H. (Spelthorne)
Fletcher-Cooke, Charles
Lester, Jim (Beeston)


Awdry, Daniel
Fookes, Miss Janet
Lewis, Kenneth (Rutland)


Baker, Kenneth
Forman, Nigel
Lloyd, Ian


Banks, Robert
Fowler, Norman (Sutton C'f'd)
Loveridge, John


Bell, Ronald
Fox, Marcus
McAdden, Sir Stephen


Bennett, Sir Frederic (Torbay)
Fraser, Rt Hon H. (Stafford &amp; St)
McCrindle, Robert


Bennett, Dr Reginald (Fareham)
Fry, Peter
McCusker, H.


Benyon, W.
Galbraith, Hon. T. G. D.
Macfarlane, Neil


Biffen, John
Gardiner, Edward (S Fylde)
MacGregor, John


Biggs-Davison, John
Gilmour, Sir John (East Fife)
Macmillan, Rt Hon M. (Farnham)


Blaker, Peter
Glyn, Dr Alan
McNair-Wilson, M. (Newbury)


Body, Richard
Godber, Rt Hon Joseph
McNair-Wilson, P. (New Forest)


Boscawen, Hon Robert
Goodlad, Alastair
Madel, David


Bottomley, Peter
Gorst, John
Marten, Neil


Bowden, A. (Brighton, Kemptown)
Gow, Ian (Eastbourne)
Mates, Michael


Boyson, Dr Rhodes (Brent)
Gower, Sir Raymond (Barry)
Mather, Carol


Bradford, Rev Robert
Gray, Hamish
Maude, Angus


Braine, Sir Bernard
Grieve, Percy
Maudling, Rt Hon Reginald


Brittan, Leon
Griffiths, Eldon
Mawby, Ray


Brocklebank-Fowler, C.
Grist, Ian
Maxwell-Hyslop, Robin


Brotherton, Michael
Grylls, Michael
Mayhew, Patrick


Brown, Sir Edward (Bath)
Hall, Sir John
Meyer, Sir Anthony


Bryan, Sir Paul
Hall-Davis, A. G. F.
Miller, Hal (Bromsgrove)


Buchanan-Smith, Alick
Hamilton, Michael (Salisbury)
Mills, Peter


Buck, Antony
Hampson, Dr Keith
Miscampbell, Norman


Budgen, Nick
Hannam, John
Moate, Roger


Bulmer, Esmond
Harvie Anderson, Rt Hon Miss
Molyneaux, James


Burden, F. A.
Hastings, Stephen
Monro, Hector


Butler, Adam (Bosworth)
Havers, Sir Michael
Montgomery, Fergus


Carlisle, Mark
Hawkins, Paul
Moore, John (Croydon C)


Carson, John
Hayhoe, Barney
More, Jasper (Ludlow)


Chalker, Mrs Lynda
Heath, Rt Hon Edward
Morris, Michael (Northampton S)


Channon, Paul
Hicks, Robert
Morrison, Charles (Devizes)


Churchill, W. S.
Higgins, Terence L.
Morrison, Hon Peter (Chester)


Clark, Alan (Plymouth, Sutton)
Hodgson, Robin
Mudd, David


Clark, William (Croydon S)
Holland, Philip
Neave, Airey


Clarke, Kenneth (Rushcliffe)
Hordern, Peter
Nelson, Anthony


Clegg, Walter
Howe, Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey
Neubert, Michael


Cockcroft, John
Howell, David (Guildford)
Newton, Tony


Cooke, Robert (Bristol W)
Hunt, David (Wirral)
Nott, John


Cope, John
Hunt, John (Bromley)
Onslow, Cranley


Cordle, John H.
Hurd, Douglas
Oppenheim, Mrs Sally


Cormack, Patrick
Hutchison, Michael Clark
Page, John (Harrow West)


Corrie, John
Irving, Charles (Cheltenham)
Page, Rt Hon R. Graham (Crosby)


Costain, A. P.
James, David
Page, Richard (Workington)


Craig, Rt Hon W. (Belfast E)
Jenkin, Rt Hon P. (Wanst'd &amp; W'df'd)
Paisley, Rev Ian


Critchley, Julian
Jessel, Toby
Parkinson, Cecil


Crowder, F. P.
Johnson Smith, G. (E Grinstead)
Pattie, Geoffrey


Davies, Rt Hon J. (Knutsford)
Johnston, Russell (Inverness)
Percival, Ian


Dean, Paul (N Somerset)
Jones, Arthur (Daventry)
Peyton, Rt Hon John


Dodsworth, Geoffrey
Jopling, Michael
Pink, R. Bonner


Douglas-Hamilton, Lord James
Joseph, Rt Hon Sir Keith
Price, David (Eastleigh)


Drayson, Burnaby
Kaberry, Sir Donald
Prior, Rt Hon James


du Cann, Rt Hon Edward
Kershaw, Anthony
Pym, Rt Hon Francis


Dunlop, John
Kilfedder, James
Raison, Timothy


Eden, Rt Hon Sir John
Kimball, Marcus
Rathbone, Tim


Edwards, Nicholas (Pembroke)
King, Evelyn (South Dorset)
Rees, Peter (Dover &amp; Deal)


Elliott, Sir William
King, Tom (Bridgwater)
Rees-Davies, W. R.


Emery, Peter
Kitson, Sir Timothy
Renton, Rt Hon Sir D. (Hunts)


Eyre, Reginald
Knox, David
Ridley, Hon Nicholas


Fairbairn, Nicholas
Lamont, Norman
Ridsdale, Julian


Fairgrieve, Russell
Langford-Holt, Sir John
Rifkind, Malcolm


Farr, John
Latham, Michael (Melton)
Rippon, Rt Hon Geoffrey







Roberts, Wyn (Conway)
Spence, John
van Straubenzee, W. R.


Rodgers, Sir John (Sevenoaks)
Spicer, Michael (S Worcester)
Vaughan, Dr Gerard


Rossi, Hugh (Hornsey)
Sproat, Iain
Viggers, Peter


Rost, Peter (SE Derbyshire)
Stanbrook, Ivor
Wakeham, John


Royle, Sir Anthony
Stanley, John
Welder, David (Clitheroe)


Sainsbury, Tim
Steen, Anthony (Wavertree)
Walker, Rt Hon P. (Worcester)


St. John-Stevas, Norman
Stewart, Ian (Hitchin)
Warren, Kenneth


Scott, Nicholas
Stokes, John
Weatherill, Bernard


Shaw, Giles (Pudsey)
Tapsell, Peter
Wells, John


Shelton, William (Streatham)
Taylor, R. (Croydon NW)
Whitelaw, Rt Hon William


Shepherd, Colin
Taylor, Teddy (Cathcart)
Winterton, Nicholas


Shersby, Michael
Tebbit, Norman
Wood, Rt Hon Richard


Silvester, Fred
Temple-Morris, Peter
Young, Sir G. (Ealing, Acton)


Sims, Roger
Thatcher, Rt Hon Margaret
Younger, Hon George


Sinclair, Sir George
Thomas, Rt Hon P. (Hendon S)



Skeet, T. H. H.
Townsend, Cyril D.
TELLERS FOR THE NOES:


Smith, Dudley (Warwick)
Trotter, Neville
Mr. Anthony Berry and


Speed, Keith
Tugendhat, Christopher
Mr. Michael Roberts.




Division List No. 429 [See c. 1782]


Division No. 429.]
AYES
[3.42 p.m.


Abse, Leo
Douglas-Mann, Bruce
Jones, Alec (Rhondda)


Allaun, Frank
Duffy, A. E. P.
Jones, Barry (East Flint)


Anderson, Donald
Dunn, James A.
Jones, Dan (Burnley)


Archer, Peter
Dunnett, Jack
Kaufman, Gerald


Armstrong, Ernest
Eadie, Alex
Kelley, Richard


Ashley, Jack
Edge, Geoff
Kilroy-Silk, Robert


Atkins, Ronald (Preston N)
Edwards, Robert (Wolv SE)
Kinnock, Neil


Atkinson, Norman
Ellis, John (Brigg &amp; Scun)
Lambie, David


Bagier, Gordon A. T.
English, Michael
Lamborn, Harry


Bain, Mrs Margaret
Ennals, David
Lamond, James


Barnett, Guy (Greenwich)
Evans, Fred (Caerphilly)
Latham, Arthur (Paddington)


Barnett, Rt Hon Joel (Heywood)
Evans, Ioan (Aberdare)
Leadbitter, Ted


Bates, Alf
Ewing, Harry (Stirling)
Lee, John


Bean, R. E.
Faulds, Andrew
Lestor, Miss Joan (Eton &amp; Slough)


Bidwell, Sydney
Fernyhough, Rt Hon E.
Lever, Rt Hon Harold


Bishop, E. S.
Fitch, Alan (Wigan)
Lipton, Marcus


Blenkinsop, Arthur
Fitt, Gerard (Belfast W)
Litterick, Tom


Boardman, H.
Flannery, Martin
Lomas, Kenneth


Booth, Rt Hon Albert
Foot, Rt Hon Michael
Loyden, Eddie


Bottomley, Rt Hon Arthur
Ford, Ben
Luard, Evan


Boyden, James (Bish Auck)
Forrester, John
Lyon, Alexander (York)


Bradley, Tom
Fowler, Gerald (The Wrekin)
Lyons, Edward (Bradford W)


Bray, Dr Jeremy
Fraser, John (Lambeth, N'w'd)
Mabon, Dr J Dickson


Brown, Hugh D. (Provan)
Freeson, Reginald
McCartney, Hugh


Brown, Robert C. (Newcastle W)
Garrett, John (Norwich S)
McDonald, Dr Oonagh


Brown, Ronald (Hackney S)
Garrett, W. E. (Wallsend)
McElhone, Frank


Buchan, Norman
George, Bruce
McGuire, Michael (Ince)


Buchanan, Richard
Gilbert, Dr John
MacKenzie, Gregor


Butler, Mrs Joyce (Wood Green)
Ginsburg, David
Mackintosh, John P.


Callaghan, Rt Hon J. (Cardiff SE)
Golding, John
Maclennan, Robert


Callaghan, Jim (Middleton &amp; P)
Gould, Bryan
McMillan, Tom (Glasgow C)


Campbell, Ian
Gourley, Harry
McNamara, Kevin


Canavan, Dennis
Graham, Ted
Madden, Max


Cant, R. B.
Grant, George (Morpeth)
Mahon, Simon


Carmichael, Neil
Grant, John (Islington C)
Mallalieu, J. P. W.


Carter, Ray
Grocott, Bruce
Marks, Kenneth


Carter-Jones, Lewis
Hamilton, James (Bothwell)
Marquand, David


Castle, Rt Hon Barbara
Hardy, Peter
Marshall, Dr Edmund (Goole)


Clemitson, Ivor
Harper, Joseph
Marshall, Jim (Leicester S)


Cocks, Rt Hon Michael
Harrison, Walter (Wakefield)
Maynard, Miss Joan


Cohen, Stanley
Hart, Rt Hon Judith
Meacher, Michael


Coleman, Donald
Hattersley, Rt Hon Roy
Mellish, Rt Hon Robert


Colquhoun, Ms Maureen
Hatton, Frank
Mendelson, John


Concannon, J. D.
Hayman, Mrs Helene
Mikardo, Ian


Cook, Robin F. (Edin C)
Healey, Rt Hon Denis
Milian, Rt Hon Bruce


Corbett, Robin
Heffer, Eric S.
Miller, Dr M. S. (E Kilbride)


Cowans, Harry
Hooley, Frank
Miller, Mrs Millie (Ilford N)


Craigen, J. M. (Maryhill)
Horam, John
Morris, Alfred (Wythenshawe)


Crawshaw, Richard
Howell, Rt Hon Denis (B'ham, Sm H)
Morris, Charles R. (Openshaw)


Cronin, John
Hoyle, Doug (Nelson)
Morris, Rt Hon J. (Aberavon)


Crosland, Rt Hon Anthony
Huckfield, Les
Moyle, Roland


Crowther, Stan (Rotherham)
Hughes, Rt Hon C. (Anglesey)
Mulley, Rt Hon Frederick


Cryer, Bob
Hughes, Robert (Aberdeen N)
Newens, Stanley


Cunningham, G. (Islington S)
Hughes, Roy (Newport)
Noble, Mike


Davidson, Arthur
Hunter, Adam
Oakes, Gordon


Davies, Bryan (Enfield N)
Irvine, Rt Hon Sir A. (Edge Hill)
Ogden, Eric


Davies, Denzil (Llanelli)
Irving, Rt Hon S. (Dartford)
O'Halloran, Michael


Davies, If or (Gower)
Jackson, Colin (Brighouse)
Orbach, Maurice


Deakins, Eric
Jackson, Miss Margaret (Lincoln)
Orme, Rt Hon Stanley


Dean, Joseph (Leeds West)
Janner, Greville
Ovenden, John


Dell, Rt Hon Edmund
Jay, Rt Hon Douglas
Owen, Rt Hon Dr David


Dempsey, James
Jenkins, Hugh (Putney)
Padley, Walter


Doig, Peter
John, Brynmor
Palmer, Arthur


Dormand, J. D.
Johnson, James (Hull West)
Park, George







Parker, John
Shore, Rt Hon Peter
Urwin, T. W.


Parry, Robert
Short, Mrs Renée (Wolv NE)
Varley, Rt Hon Eric G.


Pavitt, Laurie
Silkin, Rt Hon John (Deptford)
Walden, Brian (B'ham, L'dyw'd)


Pendry, Tom
Sillars, James
Walker, Harold (Doncaster)


Perry, Ernest
Silverman, Julius
Walker, Terry (Kingswood)


Phipps, Dr Colin
Skinner, Dennis
Watkins, David


Prentice, Rt Hon Reg
Small, William
Watkinson, John


Price, C. (Lewisham W)
Smith, John (N Lanarkshire)
Weetch, Ken


Price, William (Rugby)
Snape, Peter
Weitzman, David


Radice, Giles
Spearing, Nigel
Wellbeloved, James


Rees, Rt Hon Merlyn (Leeds S)
Spriggs, Leslie
White, James (Pollok)


Richardson, Miss Jo
Stallard, A. W.
Whitehead, Phillip


Roberts, Albert (Normanton)
Stewart. Donald (Western Isles)
Whitlock, William


Roberts, Gwilym (Cannock)
Stoddart, David
Willey. Rt Hon Frederick


Robertson, John (Paisley)
Stott, Roger
Williams, Alan (Swansea W)


Robinson, Geoffrey
Strang, Gavin
Williams, Rt Hon Shirley (Hertford)


Roderick, Caerwyn
Strauss, Rt Hon G. R.
Williams. Sir Thomas (Warrington)


Rodgers, George (Chorley)
Summerskill, Hon Dr Shirley
Wilson, Alexander (Hamilton)


Rodgers, Rt Hon William (Stockton)
Swain, Thomas
Wilson, Rt Hon Sir Harold (Huyton)


Rooker, J. W.
Taylor, Mrs Ann (Bolton W)
Wilson, William (Coventry SE)


Roper, John
Thomas, Dafydd (Merioneth)
Wise, Mrs Audrey


Rose, Paul B.
Thomas, Jeffrey (Abertillery)
Woodall, Alec


Ross, Rt Hon W. (Kilmarnock)
Thomas, Mike (Newcastle E)
Woof, Robert


Rowlands, Ted
Thomas, Ron (Bristol NW)
Wrigglesworth, Ian


Ryman, John
Thompson, George
Young, David (Bolton E)


Sandelson, Neville
Thorne, Stan (Preston South)



Sedgemore. Brian
Tierney, Sydney
TELLERS FOR THE AYES:


Selby, Harry
Tinn, James
Mr. Joseph Ashton and


Shaw, Arnold (Ilford South)
Tomlinson, John
Mr. Thomas Cox.


Sheldon, Robert (Ashton-u-Lyrae)
Torney, Tom





NOES


Adley, Robert
Dean, Paul (N Somerset)
Hodgson, Robin


Aitken, Jonathan
Dodsworth, Geoffrey
Holland, Philip


Amery, Rt Hon Julian
Douglas-Hamilton, Lord James
Hordern, Peter


Atkins, Rt Hon H. (Spelthorne)
Drayson, Burnaby
Howe, Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey


Awdry, Daniel
du Cann, Rt Hon Edward
Howell, David (Guildford)


Baker, Kenneth
Dunlop, John
Howells, Geraint (Cardigan)


Banks, Robert
Eden, Rt Hon Sir John
Hunt, David (Wirral)


Bell, Ronald
Edwards, Nicholas (Pembroke)
Hunt, John (Bromley)


Bennett, Sir Frederic (Torbay)
Elliott, Sir William
Hurd, Douglas


Bennett, Dr Reginald (Fareham)
Emery, Peter
Hutchison, Michael Clark


Benyon, W.
Eyre, Reginald
Irving, Charles (Cheltenham)


Berry, Hon Anthony
Fairbairn, Nicholas
James, David


Biffen, John
Fairgrieve, Russell
Jenkin, Rt Hon P. (Wanst'd &amp; W'df'd)


Biggs-Davison, John
Farr, John
Jessel, Toby


Blaker, Peter
Fell, Anthony
Johnson Smith, G. (E Grinstead)


Body, Richard
Finsberg, Geoffrey
Johnston, Russell (Inverness)


Boscawen, Hon Robert
Fisher, Sir Nigel
Jones, Arthur (Daventry)


Bottomley, Peter
Fletcher-Cooke, Charles
Jopling, Michael


Bowden, A. (Brighton, Kemptown)
Fookes, Miss Janel
Joseph, Rt Hon Sir Keith


Boyson, Dr Rhodes (Brent)
Forman, Nigel
Kaberry, Sir Donald


Bradford, Rev Robert
Fowler, Norman (Sutton C'f'd)
Kershaw, Anthony


Braine, Sir Bernard
Fox, Marcus
Kilfedder, James


Brittan, Leon
Fraser, Rt Hon H. (Stafford &amp; St)
Kimball, Marcus


Brocklebank-Fowler, C.
Fry, Peter
King. Evelyn (South Dorset)


Brotherton, Michael
Galbraith, Hon. T. G. D.
King, Tom (Bridgwater)


Brown, Sir Edward (Bath)
Gardiner, George (Reigate)
Kitson, Sir Timothy


Bryan, Sir Paul
Gardiner, Edward (S Fylde)
Knox, David


Buchanan-Smith, Alick
Gilmour, Sir John (East Fife)
Lamont, Norman


Buck, Antony
Glyn, Dr Alan
Langford-Holt, Sir John


Budgen, Nick
Godber, Rt Hon Joseph
Latham, Michael (Melton)


Bulmer, Esmond
Goodlad, Alastair
Lawrence, Ivan


Burden, F. A.
Gorst, John
Lawson, Nigel


Butler, Adam (Bosworth)
Gow, Ian (Eastbourne)
Lewis, Kenneth (Rutland)


Carlisle, Mark
Gower, Sir Raymond (Barry)
Lloyd, Ian


Carson, John
Gray, Hamish
Loveridge, John


Chalker, Mrs Lynda
Grieve, Percy
McAdden, Sir Stephen


Channon, Paul
Griffiths, Eldon
McCrindle, Robert


Churchill, W. S.
Grimond, Rt Hon J.
McCusker, H.


Clark, Alan (Plymouth, Sutton)
Grist, Ian
Macfarlane, Neil


Clark, William (Croydon S)
Grylls, Michael
MacGregor, John


Clarke, Kenneth (Rushcliffe)
Hall, Sir John
Macmillan, Rt Hon M. (Farnham)


Clegg, Walter
Hall-Davis. A. G. F.
McNair-Wilson, M. (Newbury)


Cockcroft, John
Hamilton, Michael (Salisbury)
McNair-Wilson, P. (New Forest)


Cooke, Robert (Bristol W)
Hampson, Dr Keith
Mader, David


Cope, John
Hannam, John
Marten, Neil


Cordle, John H.
Harvie Anderson, Rt Hon Miss
Mates, Michael


Cormack, Patrick
Hastings, Stephen
Mather, Carol


Corrie, John
Havers, Sir Michael
Maude, Angus


Costain, A. P.
Hawkins, Paul
Mawby, Ray


Craig, Rt Hon W. (Belfast E)
Hayhoe, Barney
Maxwell-Hyslop, Robin


Critchley, Julian
Heath, Rt Hon Edward
Mayhew, Patrick


Crowder, F. P.
Hicks, Robert
Meyer, Sir Anthony


Davies, Rt Hon J. (Knutsford)
Higgins, Terence L.
Miller, Hal (Bromsgrove)







Mills, Peter
Raison, Timothy
Stanley, John


Miscampbell, Norman
Rathbone, Tim
Steen, Anthony (Wavertree)


Moate, Roger
Rees, Peter (Dover &amp; Deal)
Stewart, Ian (Hitchin)


Molyneaux, James
Rees-Davies, W. R.
Stokes, John


Monro, Hector
Renton, Rt Hon Sir D. (Hunts)
Stradling Thomas, J.


Montgomery, Fergus
Ridley, Hon Nicholas
Tapsell, Peter


Moore, John (Croydon C)
Ridsdale, Julian
Taylor, R. (Croydon NW)


More, Jasper (Ludlow)
Rifkind, Malcolm
Taylor, Teddy (Cathoart)


Morris, Michael (Northampton S)
Rippon, Rt Hon Geoffrey
Tebbit, Norman


Morrison, Charles (Devizes)
Roberts, Michael (Cardiff NW)
Temple-Morris, Peter


Morrison, Hon Peter (Chester)
Roberts, Wyn (Conway)
Thatcher, Rt Hon Margaret


Mudd, David
Rodgers, Sir John (Sevenoaks)
Thomas, Rt Hon P. (Hendon S)


Neave, Airey
Ross, Stephen (Isle of Wight)
Thorpe, Rt Hon Jeremy (N Devon)


Nelson, Anthony
Ross, William (Londonderry)
Townsend, Cyril D.


Neubert, Michael
Rossi, Hugh (Hornsey)
Trotter, Neville


Newton, Tony
Rost, Peter (SE Derbyshire)
Tugendhat, Christopher


Nott, John
Royle, Sir Anthony
van Straubenze, W. R.


Onslow, Cranley
Sainsbury, Tim
Vaughan, Dr Gerard


Oppenheim, Mrs Sally
St. John-Stevas, Norman
Viggers, Peter


Page, John (Harrow West)
Scott, Nicholas
Wakeham, John


Page, Rt Hon R. Graham (Crosby)
Shaw, Giles (Pudsey)
Walder, David (Clitheroe)


Page, Richard (Workington)
Shelton, William (Streatham)
Walker, Rt Hon P. (Worcester)


Paisley, Rev Ian
Shepherd, Colin
Warren, Kenneth


Pardoe, John
Shersby, Michael
Weatherill, Bernard


Parkinson, Cecil
Silvester, Fred
Wells, John


Pattie, Geoffrey
Sims, Roger
Whitelaw, Rt Hon William


Penhaligon, David
Sinclair, Sir George
Winterton, Nicholas


Percival, Ian
Skeet, T. H. H.
Wood, Rt Hon Richard


Peyton, Rt Hon John
Smith, Dudley (Warwick)
Young, Sir G. (Ealing, Acton)


Pink, R. Bonner
Speed, Keith
Younger, Hon George


Powell, Rt Hon J. Enoch
Spence, John



Price, David (Eastleigh)
Spicer, Michael (S Worcester)
TELLERS FOR THE NOES:


Prior, Rt Hon James
Sproat, Iain
Mr. Spencer Le Marchant and


Pym, Rt Hon Francis
Stanbrook, Ivor
Mr. Jim Lester.




Division List No. 430 [See c. 1786]


Division No. 430.]
AYES
[4.03 p.m.


Abse, Leo
Cowans, Harry
Golding, John


Allaun, Frank
Craigen, J. M. (Maryhill)
Gould, Bryan


Anderson, Donald
Crawshaw, Richard
Gourlay, Harry


Archer, Peter
Cronin, John
Graham, Ted


Armstrong, Ernest
Croslend, Rt Hon Anthony
Grant, George (Morpeth)


Ashley, Jack
Crowttler, Stan (Rotherham)
Grant, John (Islington C)


Ashton, Joe
Cryer, Bob
Grocott, Bruce


Atkins, Ronald (Preston N)
Cunningham, G. (Islington S)
Hamilton, James (Bothwell)


Atkinson, Norman
Davidson, Arthur
Hardy, Peter


Bagler, Gordon A. T.
Davies, Bryan (Enfield N)
Harper, Joseph


Bain, Mrs Margaret
Davies, Denzil (Llanelli)
Harrison, Walter (Wakefield)


Barnett, Guy (Greenwich)
Davies, Ifor (Gower)
Hart, Rt Hon Judith


Barnett, Rt Hon Joel (Heywood)
Davis, Clinton (Hackney C)
Hattersley, Rt Hon Roy


Bates, All
Deakins, Eric
Harton, Frank


Bean, R. E.
Dean, Joseph (Leeds West)
Hayman, Mrs Helens


Bidwell, Sydney .
Dell. Rt Hon Edmund
Healey, Rt Hon Denis


Bishop, E. S.
Dempsey, James
Herfer, Eric S.


Blenkinsop, Arthur
Doig, Peter
Hooley, Frank


Boardman, H.
Dormand, J. D.
Horam, John


Booth, Rt Hon Albert
Douglas-Mann, Bruce
Howell, Rt Hon Denis (B'ham, Sm H)


Bottomley, Rt Hon Arthur
Duffy, A. E. P.
Hoyle, Doug (Nelson)


Boyden, James (Bish Auck)
Dunn, James A.
Huckfield, Les


Bradley, Tom
Dunnett, Jack
Hughes, Rt Hon C. (Anglesey)


Bray, Dr Jeremy
Eadie, Alex
Hughes, Robert (Aberdeen N)


Brown, Hugh D. (Provan)
Edge, Geoff
Hughes, Roy (Newport)


Brown, Robert C. (Newcastle W)
Edwards, Robert (Wolv SE)
Hunter, Adam


Brown, Ronald (Hackney S)
Ellis, John (Brigg &amp; Scun)
Irvine, Rt Hon Sir A. (Edge Hill)


Buchan, Norman
English, Michael
Irving, Rt Hon S. (Dartford)


Buchanan, Richard
Ennals, David
Jackson, Colin (Brighouse)


Butler, Mrs Joyce (Wood Green)
Evans, Fred (Caerphilly)
Jackson, Miss Margaret (Lincoln)


Callaghan, Rt Hon J. (Cardiff SE)
Evans, Ioan (Aberdare)
Janner, Greville


Callaghan, Jim (Middleton &amp; P)
Ewing, Harry (Stirling)
Jay, Rt Hon Douglas


Campbell, Ian
Faulds, Andrew
Jenkins, Hugh (Putney)


Canavan, Dennis
Fernyhough, Rt Hon E.
John, Brynmor


Cant, R. B.
Fitch, Alan (Wigan)
Johnson, James (Hull West)


Carmichael, Neil
Fitt, Gerard (Belfast W)
Jones, Alec (Rhondda)


Carter, Ray
Flannery, Martin
Jones, Barry (East Flint)


Carter-Jones, Lewis
Foot, Rt Hon Michael
Jones, Dan (Burnley)


Castle, Rt Hon Barbara
Ford, Ben
Kaufman, Gerald


Clemitson, Ivor
Forrester, John
Kelley, Richard


Cocks, Rt Hon Michael
Fowler, Gerald (The Wrekin)
Kilroy-Silk, Robert


Cohen, Stanley
Fraser, John (Lambeth, N'w'd)
Kinnock, Nell


Coleman, Donald
Freeson, Reginald
Lambie, David


Colquhoun, Ms Maureen
Garrett, John (Norwich S)
Lamborn, Harry


Concannon, J. D.
Garrett, W. E. (Wallsend)
Lamond, James


Conlan, Bernard
George, Bruce
Latham, Arthur (Paddington)


Cook, Robin F. (Edin C)
Gilbert, Dr John
Leadbitter, Ted


Corbett, Robin
Ginsburg, David
Lee, John







Lestor, Miss Joan (Eton &amp; Slough)
Owen, Rt Hon Dr David
Stoddart, David


Lever, Rt Hon Harold
Padley, Walter
Siott, Roger


Upton, Marcus
Palmer, Arthur
Strang, Gavin


Litterick, Tom
Park, George
Strauss, Rt Hon G. R.


Lomas, Kenneth
Parker, John
Summerskill, Hon Dr Shirley


Loyden, Eddie
Parry, Robert
Swain, Thomas


Luard, Evan
Pavitt, Laurie
Thomas, Dafydd (Merioneth)


Lyon, Alexander (York)
Pendry, Tom
Thomas, Jeffrey (Abertillery)


Lyons, Edward (Bradford W)
Perry, Ernest
Thomas, Jeffrey (Abertillery)


Mabon, Dr J Dickson
Phipps, Dr Colin
Thomas, Mike (Newcastle E)


McCartney, Hugh
Prentice, Rt Hon Reg
Thomas, Ron (Bristol NW)


McDonald, Dr Oonagh
Price, C. (Lewisham W)
Thompson, George


McElhone, Frank
Price, William (Rugby)
Thorne, Stan (Preston South)


McGuire, Michael (Ince)
Radice, Giles
Tierney, Sydney


MacKenzie, Gregor
Rees, Rt Hon Merlyn (Leeds S)
Tinn, James


Mackintosh, John P.
Richardson, Miss Jo
Tomlinson, John


Maclennan, Robert
Roberts, Albert (Normanlon)
Torney, Tom


McMillan, Tom (Glasgow C)
Roberts, Gwilym (Cannock)
Urwin, T. W.


McNamara, Kevin
Robertson, John (Paisley)
Varley, Rt Hon Eric G.


Madden, Max
Robinson, Geoffrey
Walden, Brian (B'ham, L'dyw'd)


Marion, Simon
Roderick, Caerwyn
Walker, Harold (Doncaster)


Mallalieu, J. P. W.
Rodgers, George (Chorley)
Walker, Terry (Kingswood)


Marks, Kenneth
Rodgers, Rt Hon William (Stockton)
Watkins, David


Marquand, David
Rooker, J. W.
Watkinson, John


Marshall, Dr Edmund (Goole)
Roper, John
Weetch, Ken


Marshall, Jim (Leicester S)
Rose, Paul B.
Weitzman, David


Maynard, Miss Joan
Ross, Rt Hon W. (Kilmarnock)
Wellbeloved, James.


Meacher, Michael
Rowlands, Ted
White, James (Pollok)


Mellish, Rt Hon Robert
Ryman, John
Whitehead, Phillip


Mendelson, John
Sandelson, Neville
Whillock, William


Mikardo, Ian
Sedgemore, Brian
Willey, Rt Hon Frederick


Millan, Rt Hon Bruce
Selby, Harry
Williams, Alan (Swansea W)


Miller, Dr M. S. (E Kilbride)
Shaw, Arnold (Ilford South)
Williams, Rt Hon Shirley (Hertford)


Miller, Mrs Millie (Ilford N)
Sheldon, Robert (Ashton-u-Lyne)
Williams, Sir Thomas (Warrington)


Morris, Alfred (Wythenshawe)
Shore, Rt Hon Peter
Wilson, Alexander (Hamilton)


Morris, Charles R. (Openshaw)
Short, Mrs Renée (Wolv NE)
Wilson, Rt Hon Sir Harold (Huyton)


Morris, Rt Hon J. (Aberavon)
Silkin, Rt Hon John (Deptford)
Wilson, William (Coventry SE)


Moyle, Roland
Sillars, James
Wise, Mrs Audrey


Mulley, Rt Hon Frederick
Silverman, Julius
Woodall, Alec


Newens, Stanley
Skinner, Dennis
Woof, Robert


Noble, Mike
Small, William
Wrigglesworth, Ian


Oakes, Gordon
Smith, John (N Lanarkshire)
Young, David (Bolton E)


Ogden, Eric
Spearing, Nigel



O'Halloran, Michael
Spriggs, Leslie
TELLERS FOR THE AYES:


Orbach, Maurice
Stallard, A. W.
Mr. Thomas Cox and


Orme, Rt Hon Stanley
Stewart, Donald (Western Isles)
Mr. Peter Snape.


Ovenden, John







NOES



Daley, Robert
Churchill, W. S.
Fry, Peter


Aitkin, Jonathan
Clark, William (Croydon S)
Galbraith, Hon. T. G. D.


Amery, Rt Hon Julian
Clarke, Kenneth (Rusncliffe)
Gardiner, George (Reigate)


Atkins, Rt Hon H. (Spetthorne)
Clegg, Walter
Gardiner, Edward (S Fylde)


Awdry, Daniel
Cockcroft, John
Gilmour, Sir John (East Fife)


Baker, Kenneth
Cooke, Robert (Bristol W)
Glyn, Dr Alan


Banks, Robert
Cope, John
Godber, Rt Hon Joseph


Bell, Ronald
Cordle, John H.
Goodlad, Alastair


Bennett, Sir Frederic (Torbay)
Cormack, Patrick
Gorst, John


Bennett, Dr Reginald (Fareham)
Costain, A. P.
Gow, Ian (Eastbourne)


Benyon, W.
Craig, Rt Hon W. (Belfast E)
Gower, Sir Raymond (Barry)


Berry, Hon Anthony
Critchley, Julian
Grant, Anthony (Harrow C)


Biffen, John
Crowder, F. P.
Gray, Hamish


Biggs-Davison, John
Davies, Rt Hon J. (Knutsford)
Grieve, Percy


Blaker, Peter
Dean, Paul (N Somerset)
Griffiths, Eldon


Body, Richard
Dodsworth, Geoffrey
Grimond, Rt Hon J.


Boscawen, Hon Robert
Douglas-Hamilton, Lord James
Grist, Ian


Bottomley, Peter
Drayson, Burnaby
Grylls, Michael


Bowden, A. (Brighton, Kemptown)
du Cann, Rt Hon Edward
Hall, Sir John


Boyson, Dr Rhodes (Brent)
Eden, Rt Hon Sir John
Hall-Davis, A. G. F.


Bradford, Rev Robert
Edwards, Nicholas (Pembroke)
Hamilton, Michael (Salisbury)


Braine, Sir Bernard
Elliott, Sir William
Hampson, Dr Keith


Brittan, Leon
Emery, Peter
Hannam,John


Brocklebank-Fowler, C.
Eyre, Reginald
Harvie Anderson, Rt Hon Miss


Brotherton, Michael
Fairbairn, Nicholas
Hastings, Stephen


Brown, Sir Edward (Bath)
Fairgrieve, Russell
Havers, Sir Michael


Bryan, Sir Paul
Fair, John
Hawkins, Paul


Buchanan-Smith, Alick
Fell, Anthony
Hayhoe, Barney


Buck, Antony
Finsberg, Geoffrey
Heath, Rt Hon Edward


Budgen, Nick
Fisher, Sir Nigel
Hicks, Robert


Bulmer, Esmond
Fletcher-Cooke, Charles
Higgins, Terence L.


Burden, F. A.
Fookes, Miss Janet
Hodgson, Robin


Butler, Adam (Bosworth)
Forman, Nigel
Holland, Philip


Carlisle, Mark
Fowler, Norman (Suttlon C'f'd)
Hordern, Peter


Chalker, Mrs Lynda
Fox, Marcus
Howe, Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey


Channon, Paul
Fraser, Rt Hon H. (Stafford &amp; St)
Howell, David (Guildford)







Howells, Geraint (Cardigan)
Miscampbell, Norman
Scott, Nicholas


Hunt, David (Wirral)
Moate, Roger
Shaw, Giles (Pudsey)


Hunt, John (Bromley)
Molyneaux, James
Shelton, William (Streatham)


Hurd, Douglas
Monro, Hector
Shepherd, Colin


Hutchison, Michael Clark
Montgomery, Fergus
Shersby, Michael


Irving, Charles (Cheltenham)
Moore, John (Croydon C)
Silvester, Fred


James, David
More, Jasper (Ludlow)
Sims, Roger


Jenkin, Rt Hon p. (Wanst'd &amp; W'df'd)
Morris, Michael (Northampton S)
Sinclair, Sir George


Jessel, Toby
Morrison, Charles (Devizes)
Skeet, T. H. H.


Johnson Smith, G. (E Grinstead)
Morrison, Hon Peter (Chester)
Smith, Dudley (Warwick)


Johnston, Russell (Inverness)
Mudd, David
Speed, Keith


Jones, Arthur (Daventry)
Neave, Airey
Spence, John


Jopling, Michael
Nelson, Anthony
Spicer, Michael (S Worcester)


Joseph, Rt Hon Sir Keith
Neubert, Michael
Sproat, Iain


Kaberry, Sir Donald
Newton, Tony
Stanbrook, Ivor


Kershaw, Anthony
Nott, John
Stanley, John


Kilfedder, James
Onslow, Cranley
Steen, Anthony (Wavertree)


Kimball, Marcus
Oppenheim, Mrs Sally
Stewart, Ian (Hitchin)


King, Evelyn (South Dorset)
Page, John (Harrow West)
Stokes, John


King, Tom (Bridgwater)
Page, Rt Hon R. Graham (Crosby)
Stradling Thomas, J.


Kitson, Sir Timothy
Page, Richard (Workington)
Tapsell, Peter


Knox, David
Pardoe, John
Taylor, R. (Croydon NW)


Lamont, Norman
Parkinson, Cecil
Taylor, Teddy (Cathcart)


Langford-Holt, Sir John
Pattie, Geoffrey
Tebbit, Norman


Latham, Michael (Melton)
Penhaligon, David
Temple-Morris, Peter


Lawrence, Ivan
Percival, Ian
Thatcher, Rt Hon Margaret


Lawson, Nigel
Peyton, Rt Hon John
Thomas, Rt Hon P. (Hendon S)


Le Marchant, Spencer
Pink, R. Bonner
Thorpe, Rt Hon Jeremy (N Devon)


Lester, Jim (Beeston)
Price, David (Eastleigh)
Townsend, Cyril D.


Lewis, Kenneth (Rutland)
Prior, Rt Hon James
Trotter, Neville


Lloyd, Ian
Pym, Rt Hon Francis
Tugendhat, Christopher


Loveridge, John
Raison, Timothy
van Straubenzee, W. R.


McAdden, Sir Stephen
Rathbone, Tim
Vaughan, Dr Gerand


McCrindle, Robert
Rees, Peter (Dover &amp; Deal)
Viggers, Peter


Macfarlane, Neil
Rees-Davies, W. R.
Wakeham, John


MacGregor, John
Renton, Rt Hon Sir D. (Hunts)
Walder, David (Clitheroe)


Macmillan, Rt Hon M. (Farnham)
Ridley, Hon Nicholas
Walker, Rt Hon P. (Worcester)


McNair-Wilson, M. (Newbury)
Ridsdale, Julian
Warren, Kenneth


McNair-Wilson, P. (New Forest)
Rifkind, Malcolm
Weatherill, Bernard


Madel, David
Rippon, Rt Hon Geoffrey
Wells, John


Marten, Neil
Roberts, Michael (Cardiff NW)
Whitelaw, Rt Hon William


Mates, Michael
Roberts, Wyn (Conway)
Winterton, Nicholas


Maude, Angus
Rodgers, Sir John (Sevenoaks)
Wood, Rt Hon Richard


Mawby, Ray
Ross, Stephen (Isle of Wight)
Young, Sir G. (Ealing, Acton)


Maxwell-Hyslop, Robin
Rossi, Hugh (Hornsey)
Younger, Hon George


Mayhew, Patrick
Rost, Peter (SE Derbyshire)



Meyer, Sir Anthony
Royle, Sir Anthony
TELLERS FOR THE NOES


Milter, Hal (Bromsgrove)
Sainsbury, Tim
Mr. John Corrie and


Mills, Peter
St. John-Stevas, Norman
Mr. Carol Mather.




Division List No. 431 [See c. 1793]


Division No. 431.]
AYES
[4.36 p.m.


Adley, Robert
Carlisle, Mark
Farr, John


Altken, Jonathan
Carson, John
Fell, Anthony


Amery, Rt Hon Julian
Chalker, Mrs Lynda
Finsberg, Geoffrey


Atkins, Rt Hon H. (Spelthorne)
Channon, Paul
Fisher, Sir Nigel


Awdry, Daniel
Churchill, W. S.
Fletcher-Cooke, Charles


Bain, Mrs Margaret
Clark, Alan (Plymouth, Sutton)
Fookes, Miss Janet


Baker, Kenneth
Clark, William (Croydon S)
Forman, Nigel


Banks, Robert
Clarke, Kenneth (Rushcliffe)
Fowler, Norman (Sutton C'f'd)


Bell, Ronald
Clegg, Walter
Fox, Marcus


Bennett, Sir Frederic (Torbay)
Cockcroft, John
Fraser, Rt Hon N. (Stafford &amp; St)


Bennett, Dr Reginald (Fareham)
Cooke, Robert (Bristol W)
Fry, Peter


Benyon, W.
Cope, John
Galbraith, Hon. T. G. D.


Berry, Hon Anthony
Cordie, John H.
Gardiner, George (Reigate)


Bitten, John
Cormack, Patrick
Gardiner, Edward (S Fylde)


Biggs-Davison, John
Corrie, John
Gilmour, Sir John (East Fife)


Blaker, Peter
Costain, A. P.
Glyn, Dr Alan


Body, Richard
Craig, Rt Hon W. (Belfast E)
Godber, Rt Hon Joseph


Boscawen, Hon Robert
Critchley, Julian
Goodlad, Alastair


Bottomley, Peter
Crowder, F. P.
Gorst, John


Bowden, A. (Brighton, Kemptown)
Davies, Rt Hon J. (Knutsford)
Gow, Ian (Eastbourne)


Boyson, Dr Rhodes (Brent)
Dean, Paul (N Somerset)
Gower, Sir Raymond (Barry)


Braine, Sir Bernard
Dodsworth, Geoffrey
Grant, Anthony (Harrow C)


Brittan, Leon
Douglas-Hamilton, Lord James
Grieve, Percy


Brocklebank-Fowler, C.
Drayson, Burnaby
Griffiths, Eldon


Brotherton, Michael
du Cann, Rt Hon Edward
Grist, Ian


Brown, Sir Edward (Bath)
Dunlop, John
Grylls, Michael


Bryan, Sir Paul
Eden, Rt Hon Sir John
Hall, Sir John


Buchanan-Smith, Alick
Edwards, Nicholas (Pembroke)
Hall-Davis, A. G. F.


Buck, Antony
Elliott, Sir William
Hamilton, Michael (Salisbury)


Budgen, Nick
Emery, Peter
Hampson, Dr Keith


Bulmer, Esmond
Eyre, Reginald
Hannam, John


Burden, F. A.
Fairbairn, Nicholas
Harvie Anderson, Rt Hon Miss


Butler, Adam (Bosworth)
Fairgrieve, Russell
Hastings, Stephen







Havers, Sir Michael
Mawby, Ray
Royle, Sir Anthony


Hawkins, Paul
Maxwell-Hyslop, Robin
Sainsbury, Tim


Hayhoe, Barney
Mayhew, Patrick
St. John-Stevas, Norman


Heath, Rt Hon Edward
Meyer, Sir Anthony
Scott, Nicholas


Hicks, Robert
Miller, Hal (Bromsgrove)
Shaw, Giles (Pudsey)


Higgins, Terence L.
Mills, Peter
Shelton, William (Streatham)


Hodgson, Robin
Miscampbell, Norman
Shepherd, Colin


Holland, Philip
Moate, Roger
Shersby, Michael


Hordern, Peter
Molyneaux, James
Sims, Roger


Howell, David (Guildford)
Monro, Hector
Sinclair, Sir George


Howe, Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey
Montgomery, Fergus
Skeet, T. H. H.


Howells, Geraint (Cardigan)
Moore, John (Croydon C)
Smith, Dudley (Warwick)


Hunt, David (Wirral)
More, Jasper (Ludlow)
Speed, Keith


Hunt, John (Bromley)
Morris, Michael (Northampton S)
Spence, John


Hurd, Douglas
Morrison, Charles (Devizes)
Spicer, Michael (S Worcester)


Hutchison, Michael Clark
Morrison, Hon Peter (Chester)
Sproat, Iain


Irving, Charles (Cheltenham)
Mudd, David
Stanbrook, Ivor


James, David
Neave, Airey
Stanley, John


Jenkin, Rt Hon P. (Wanst'd &amp; W'df'd)
Nelson, Anthony
Steen, Anthony (Wavertree)


Jessel, Toby
Neubert, Michael
Stewart, Donald (Western Isles)


Johnson Smith, G. (E Grinstead)
Newton, Tony
Stewart, Ian (Hitchin)


Johnston, Russell (Inverness)
Nott, John
Stokes, John


Jones, Arthur (Daventry)
Onslow, Cranley
Stradling Thomas, J.


Jopling, Michael
Oppenheim, Mrs Sally
Tapsell, Peter


Joseph, Rt Hon Sir Keith
Page, John (Harrow West)
Taylor, R. (Croydon NW)


Kaberry, Sir Donald
Page, Rt Hon R. Graham (Crosby)
Taylor, Teddy (Cathcart)


Kershaw, Anthony
Page, Richard (Workington)
Tebbit, Norman


Kimball, Marcus
Paisley, Rev Ian
Temple-Morris, Peter


King, Evelyn (South Dorset)
Pardoe, John
Thatcher, Rt Hon Margaret


King, Tom (Bridgwater)
Parkinson, Cecil
Thomas, Dafydd (Merioneth)


Kitson, Sir Timothy
Pattie, Geoffrey
Thomas, Rt Hon P. (Hendon S)


Knox, David
Penhaligon, David
Thompson, George


Lamont, Norman
Percival, Ian
Thorpe, Rt Hon Jeremy (N Devon)


Langford-Holt, Sir John
Peyton, Rt Hon John
Townsend, Cyril D.


Latham, Michael (Melton)
Pink, R. Bonner
Trotter, Neville


Lawrence, Ivan
Price, David (Eastleigh)
Tugendhat, Christopher


Lawson, Nigel
Prior, Rt Hon James
van Straubenzee, W. R.


Lester, Jim (Beeston)
Pym, Rt Hon Francis
Vaughan, Dr Gerard


Lewis, Kenneth (Rutland)
Raison, Timothy
Viggers, Peter


Lloyd, Ian
Rathbone, Tim
Wakeham, John


Loveridge, John
Rees, Peter (Dover &amp; Deal)
Walder, David (Clitheroe)


McAdden, Sir Stephen
Rees-Davies, W. R.
Walker, Rt Hon P. (Worcester)


McCrindle, Robert
Renton, Rt Hon Sir D. (Hunts)
Warren, Kenneth


McCusker, H.
Ridley, Hon Nicholas
Weatherill, Bernard


Macfarlane, Nell
Ridsdale, Julian
Wells, John


MacGregor, John
Rifkind, Malcolm
Whitelaw, Rt Hon William


Macmillan, Rt Hon M. (Farnham)
Rippon, Rt Hon Geoffrey
Winterton, Nicholas


McNair-Wilson, M. (Newbury)
Roberts, Michael (Cardiff NW)
Wood, Rt Hon Richard


McNair-Wilson, P. (New Forest)
Roberts, Wyn (Conway)
Young, Sir G. (Ealing, Acton)


Madel, David
Rodgers, Sir John (Sevenoaks)
Younger, Hon George


Marten, Neil
Ross, Stephen (Isle of Wight)
TELLERS FOR THE AYES:


Mates, Michael
Ross, William (Londonderry)
Mr. Spencer Le Marchant and


Mather, Carol
Rossi, Hugh (Hornsey)
Mr. Fred Silvester.


Maude, Angus
Rost, Peter (SE Derbyshire)





NOES


Abse, Leo
Callaghan, Rt Hon J. (Cardiff SE)
Davies, Denzil (Llanelli)


Allaun, Frank
Callaghan, Jim (Middleton &amp; P)
Davies, Ifor (Gower)


Anderson, Donald
Campbell, Ian
Davis, Clinton (Hackney C)


Archer, Peter
Canavan, Dennis
Deakins, Eric


Armstrong, Ernest
Cant, R. B.
Dean, Joseph (Leeds West)


Ashley, Jack
Carmichael, Neil
Dell, Rt Hon Edmund


Ashton, Joe
Carter, Ray
Dempsey, James


Atkins, Ronald (Preston N)
Carter-Jones, Lewis
Doig, Peter


Atkinson, Norman
Castle, Rt Hon Barbara
Dormand, J. D.


Bagier, Gordon A. T.
Clemitson, Ivor
Douglas-Mann, Bruce


Barnett, Guy (Greenwich)
Cocks, Rt Hon Michael
Duffy, A. E. P.


Barnett, Rt Hon Joel (Heywood)
Cohen, Stanley
Dunn, James A.


Bates, Alf
Coleman, Donald
Dunnett, Jack


Bean, R. E.
Colquhoun, Ms Maureen
Eadie, Alex


Bidwell, Sydney
Concannon, J. D.
Edge, Geoff


Bishop, E. S.
Conlan, Bernard
Edwards, Robert (Wolv SE)


Blenkinsop, Arthur
Cook, Robin F. (Edin C)
Ellis, John (Brigg &amp; Scun)


Boardman, H.
Corbett, Robin
English, Michael


Booth, Rt Hon Albert
Cowans, Harry
Ennals, David


Bottomley, Rt Hon Arthur
Cox, Thomas (Tooting)
Evans, Fred (Caerphilly)


Boyden, James (Bish Auck)
Craigen, J. M. (Maryhill)
Evans, Ioan (Aberdare)


Bradley, Tom
Crawshaw, Richard
Ewing, Harry (Stirling)


Bray, Dr Jeremy
Cronin, John
Faulds, Andrew


Brown, Hugh D. (Provan)
Crosland, Rt Hon Anthony
Fernyhough, Rt Hon E.


Brown, Robert C. (Newcastle W)
Crowther, Stan (Rotherham)
Fitch, Alan (Wigan)


Brown, Ronald (Hackney S)
Cryer, Bob
Fitt, Gerard (Belfast W)


Buchan, Norman
Cunningham, G. (Islington S)
Flannery, Martin


Buchanan, Richard
Davidson, Arthur
Foot, Rt Hon Michael


Butler, Mrs Joyce (Wood Green)
Davies, Bryan (Enfield N)
Ford, Ben







Forrester, John
Lyons, Edward (Bradford W)
Rose, Paul B.


Fowler, Gerald (The Wrekin)
Mabon, Dr J Dickson
Ross, Rt Hon W. (Kilmarnock)


Fraser, John (Lambeth, N'w'd)
McCartney, Hugh
Rowlands, Ted


Freeson, Reginald
McDonald, Dr Oonagh
Ryman, John


Garrett, John (Norwich S)
McElhone, Frank
Sandelson, Neville


Garrett, W. E. (Wallsend)
McGuire, Michael (Ince)
Sedgemore, Brian


George, Bruce
MacKenzie, Gregor
Selby, Harry


Gilbert, Dr John
Maclennan, Robert
Shaw, Arnold (llford South)


Ginsburg, David
McMillan, Tom (Glasgow C)
Sheldon, Robert (Ashton-u-Lyne)


Golding, John
McNamara, Kevin
Shore, Rt Hon Peter


Gould, Bryan
Madden, Max
Short, Mrs Renée (Wolv NE)


Gourlay, Harry
Mahon, Simon
Silkin, Rt Hon John (Deptford)


Graham, Ted
Mallalieu, J. P. W.
Silverman, Julius


Grant, George (Morpeth)
Marks, Kenneth
Skinner, Dennis


Grant, John (Islington C)
Marquand, David
Small, William


Grocott, Bruce
Marshall, Dr Edmund (Goole)
Smith, John (N Lanarkshire)


Hamilton, James (Bothwell)
Marshall, Jim (Leicester S)
Snape, Peter


Hardy, Peter
Maynard, Miss Joan
Spearing, Nigel


Harrison, Walter (Wakefield)
Meacher, Michael
Spriggs, Leslie


Hart, Rt Hon Judith
Mellish, Rt Hon Robert
Stallard, A. W.


Hattersley, Rt Hon Roy
Mendelson, John
Stoddart, David


Hatton, Frank
Mikardo, Ian
Stott, Roger


Hayman, Mrs Helene
Millan, Rt Hon Bruce
Strang, Gavin


Healey, Rt Hon Denis
Miller, Dr M. S. (E Kilbride)
Strauss, Rt Hon G. R.


Heffer, Eric S.
Miller, Mrs Millie (llford N)
Summerskill, Hon Dr Shirley


Hooley, Frank
Morris, Alfred (Wythenshawe)
Swain, Thomas


Horam, John
Morris, Charles R. (Openshaw)
Taylor, Mrs Ann (Bolton W)


Howell, Rt Hon Denis (B'ham, Sm H)
Morris, Rt Hon J. (Aberavon)
Thomas, Jeffrey (Abertillery)


Hoyle, Doug (Nelson)
Moyle, Roland
Thomas, Mike (Newcastle E)


Huckfield, Les
Mulley, Rt Hon Frederick
Thomas, Ron (Bristol NW)


Hughes, Rt Hon C. (Anglesey)
Newens, Stanley
Thorne, Stan (Preston South)


Hughes, Robert (Aberdeen N)
Noble, Mike
Tierney, Sydney


Hughes, Roy (Newport)
Oakes, Gordon
Tomlinson, John


Hunter, Adam
Ogden, Eric
Torney, Tom


Irvine, Rt Hon Sir A. (Edge Hill)
O'Halloran, Michael
Urwin, T. W.


Irving, Rt Hon S. (Dartford)
Orbach, Maurice
Varley, Rt Hon Eric G.


Jackson, Colin (Brighouse)
Orme, Rt Hon Stanley
Walden, Brian (B'ham, L'dyw'd)


Jackson, Miss Margaret (Lincoln)
Ovenden, John
Walker, Harold (Doncaster)


Janner, Greville
Owen, Rt Hon Dr David
Walker, Terry (Kingswood)


Jay, Rt Hon Douglas
Padley, Walter
Watkins, David


Jenkins, Hugh (Putney)
Palmer, Arthur
Watkinson, John


John, Brynmor
Park, George
Weetch, Ken


Johnson, James (Hull West)
Parker, John
Weitzman, David


Jones, Alec (Rhondda)
Parry, Robert
Wellbeloved, James


Jones, Barry (East Flint)
Pavitt, Laurie
White, James (Pollok)


Jones, Dan (Burnley)
Pendry, Tom
Whitehead, Phillip


Kaufman, Gerald
Perry, Ernest
Whillock, William


Kelley, Richard
Phipps, Dr Colin
Willey, Rt Hon Frederick


Kilroy-Silk, Robert
Prentice, Rt Hon Reg
Williams, Alan (Swansea W)


Kinnock, Neil
Price, C. (Lewisham W)
Williams, Rt Hon Shirley (Hertford)


Lambie, David
Price, William (Rugby)
Williams, Sir Thomas (Warrington)


Lamborn, Harry
Radice, Giles
Wilson, Alexander (Hamilton)


Lamond, James
Rees, Rt Hon Merlyn (Leeds S)
Wilson, Rt Hon Sir Harold (Huyton)


Latham, Arthur (Paddington)
Richardson, Miss Jo
Wilson, William (Coventry SE)


Leadbitter, Ted
Roberts, Albert (Normanton)
Wise, Mrs Audrey


Lee, John
Roberts, Gwilym (Cannock)
Woodall, Alec


Lestor, Miss Joan (Eton &amp; Slough)
Robertson, John (Paisley)
Woof, Robert


Lever, Rt Hon Harold
Robinson, Geoffrey
Wrigglesworth, Ian


Lipton, Marcus
Roderick, Caerwyn
Young, David (Bolton E)


Litterick, Tom
Rodgers, George (Chorley)



Lomas, Kenneth
Rodgers, Rt Hon William (Stockton)
TELLERS FOR THE NOES:


Loyden, Eddie
Rooker, J. W.
Mr. Joseph Harper and


Luard, Evan
Roper, John
Mr. James Tinn.


Lyon, Alexander (York)